Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 537 …of Air Staff, Plans, Col. Orvil A. Anderson, had in preparation a study of the possibility…
  • p. 757 …Cole O d l e Anderson, CaPt. Ball, Capt. Moss, and himself. The im- portance of…
  • p. 770 …AFSHO files. 9. Lt. Col. O.A. Anderson, AWPD, Air Forces Estimate of the Situation, 1…
  • p. 797 …for C/AS from Col. O.A. Anderson, AC/AS, Plans, 25 June 1942. General Marshall…
  • p. 812 …for Col. George from Maj. S.E. Anderson, Research Regarding Bomber-Fighter Combats in Europe, 1…
  • p. 818 …AC/S, OPD from Col. O.A. Anderson, 10 July 1942. 197. Key Plan for the…
  • p. 840 …5 1 2 Andaman Is., 500, 503 Anderson, Col. 0. A., 472 Andes, 639 Andres, Pvt…
R O U E N - S O T T E V I L L E N O . I
General Eaker made some interesting personal observations on the
problems uncovered by this initial combat T h e crews were
enthusiastic and alert, but nonchalant to the point of being blasC.
Possibly it had all been too easy, but confidence was a good fault in a
bomber crew. Crew drills, especially in the handling of the oxygen
equipment, appeared to be indicated, and air discipline needed
improvement. A better, tighter defensive formation would offer more
protection against enemy fighters-not that enemy action had been
a serious factor in this instance. T h e critical items in missions of this
sort General Eaker considered to be the split-second timing for
rendezvous with the fighter escort (the fighters in this case had been
a few minutes late), navigation to the target (there would not always
be weather so fine that the target could be seen for ten miles), train-
ing of bombardiers (the Sotteville yard was, after all, considerably
larger than the proverbial pickle barrel), pilotage of such a high order
that a tight yet maneuverable formation might be flown with the
shortest possible level run on the target (anything less would simply
court disaster from flak and fighter opposition, both of which might
be expected to improve materially), and, finally, accurate gunnery.
O n the matter of escort, General Eaker was unwilling to say that
the B-I 7 could make deep penetrations into German-held territory
without cover, although it was apparent from the Rouen mission that
German fighters would approach the bombers gingerl~.~’General
Spaatz shared Eaker’s caution on this point. In the cable of I 8 August,
to which reference has been made above, Spaatz asserted that Amer-
ican bombers would not be sent indiscriminately into Germany and
that depth of penetration would increase only as experience dictated.
Meanwhile, pending determined enemy fighter attacks, which would
undoubtedly soon materialize, no definite conclusions could be
reached regarding the feasibility of bomber attacks unsupported by
fighter^.^ *
O n the day after this first mission executed by his bombers, General
Eaker received the following message from Air Marshal Sir Arthur T.
Harris, Air Officer Commanding-in-Chief, RAF Bomber Command:
“Congratulations from all ranks of Bomber Command on the highly
successful completion of the first all American raid by the big fellows
on German occupied territory in Europe. Yankee Doodle certainly
went to town and can stick yet another well-deserved feather in his
cap.” 32
665

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.