Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 2 THE UNIVERSITYOF CHICAGOPRESS, CHICAGO8 LONDON The University of Toronto Press, Toronto 5, Canada Copyright 1948 by…
  • p. 48 …An Associated Press dispatch of 10 October gave a contemporary judgment of the importance of this…
  • p. 55 …Air Service (Corps) found it difficult to press vigorously for reorgani- zation and, by default, leadership…
  • p. 56 …In 1919the W a r Department was pressing for a drastic revision of the military establishment…
  • p. 61 …It held that there was no danger of an air attack on the United States and…
  • p. 64 …GHQ Air Forcq a trial than to press for more radical measures, and Howell’s group…
  • p. 75 …Powerful air attacks resolutely pressed home could never be completely stopped, but their effects could best…
  • p. 98 …based air operations in defense of the United States and its overseas posses~ions.’~T w…
  • p. 99 …General Westover’s report concluded that “all Air Force units could be concentrated on either coast…
  • p. 130 …the Admiralty began to press for control of naval air units, while the army attempted to…
  • p. 149 …basic and advanced Responsibility for crew and unit train- ing was vested in the GHQ Air…
  • p. 164 …A m y air units in the Territory existed primarily for the defense of this and…
  • p. 176 …no military alliances were made which would commit the United States to war; the plans only…
  • p. 278 …There were also grounds for hoping that heavy bomber units now based on Darwin might increase…
  • p. 285 …From 1938 the United States had invoked sanctions against Japan in the form of moral em…
  • p. 287 …Over-all Strategy and lmmediate Deployment On 2 2 December, the press announced dramatically the arrival…
  • p. 289 …ground units sent in that direction were not destined for immediate combat. No major invasion of…
  • p. 323 …Seizure of bases in Canada or Mexico for later attacks on the United States. Capture of…
  • p. 366 …United state^,^ and the British them- selves were forced to withdraw some pilots from combat units…
  • p. 380 …Upon the request of the Ferrying Command, the State Depart- ment again pressed for an answer…
  • p. 397 …the summer and fall, first as the United States Middle East Air Force and later as…
  • p. 430 …Attempts had been made to replace these obsolete craft by purchase from the United States, but…
  • p. 440 …But as the Japanese pressed forward the Americans were given no opportunity to get set. The…
  • p. 463 …personnel that would be reassigned to infantry units whose rosters already included many representatives of the…
  • p. 552 …pines and more recently of American air units operating in the Netherlands East Indies, he was…
  • p. 560 …Moreover, examination proved that most of the basic equipment of the units, including badly needed trucks…
  • p. 563 …Grady arrived from the United States for a comprehensive survey of Indian resources with reference to…
  • p. 564 …TO C H I N A graphic units, and unfavorable atmospheric conditions combined to make high…
  • p. 607 …Thus the AAF units engaged in the anti-U-boat war became almost a t once…
  • p. 628 …Army air bombardment units would operate offensively in collaboration with the Royal Air Force, primarily against…
  • p. 658 …was to operate in the United Kingdom.14' All air units initially based there were to…
  • p. 683 …of the units of the infant Eighth until their departure for the United Kingdom several months…
  • p. 691 …The RAF proposed that American fighter units be integrated with its own under a plan eventually…
  • p. 748 …533.) By 1928he was (Patrick, United States in the Air, pp. 190-91.) 38. Charges of…
  • p. 770 …y.W D Press Release, 2 1 June 1941. 9 1 . AR 95-5, 3a. 92…
  • p. 857 …Presque Isle, 344, 347-49, 641, 644-45 Press comment: B-17, 662-63; danger of…
R O U E N - S O T T E V I L L E N O . I
failed to recognize their objectives in time to attack or else ran into
such stiff opposition that they could not bomb. T w o planes were shot
down by flak and one was badly damaged. The British lost one plane,
evidently as a result of flak damage plus the attentions of the only
enemy fighter to make effective interception that day. But the Ameri-
can losses did not stem entirely from the inexperience of freshmen
crews, although one of the pilots shot down was reported to have
taken insufficient evasive action in the flak area. T h e fact was that for
some reason the mission ran into very heavy opposition from antiair-
craft batteries, especially at the two northern airdromes of De Kooy
and Haamstede. It even seemed to the surviving crews that the enemy
gunners must have been warned in advance by ships in the Channel
which had sighted the Bostons on their trip toward the Dutch coast.
The RAF leader of the element attacking De Kooy reported the
worst flak in his experience, and over-all losses in this one mission were
declared to have been equal to the total losses of No. 2 2 6 Squadron
in similar operations for the preceding five and one-half months.ll
During the mission, however, one incident occurred which proved
heartening to the American force and which did much to offset the
otherwise discouraging results. Capt. Charles C. Kegelman, flying
with the element detailed to bomb De Kooy airdrome, had his right
propeller shot away by flak while in the vicinity of the target. The
ground fire also damaged his right wing and started a fire in his right
engine. Kegelman's plane lost altitude and actually struck the ground,
but he was able to keep it in the air after it bounced back up. Then,
as he was preparing to leave the scene as fast as his one good engine
would take him, he saw the gunners of a flak tower swinging their
guns on him. Turning slightly, he flew directly a t the tower and
opened fire with the nose guns at close range. Fire from the tower
ceased. H e then proceeded to fly home at water level. For this ex-
ploit, he was awarded the Distinguished Service Cross.'
The mission of 4 July had not been an ideal operation with which
to inaugurate the American air offensive from the United Kingdom.
Not only was it a small raid and one flown in borrowed planes, but
it was tactically of little significance since the future of the bomber
campaign depended on the development of high-altitude heavy bom-
bardment techniques rather than those of low-level attack by fast,
light planes. Nevertheless, the mission marked a beginning of a sort
and did much to stimulate morale among the American flyers. At
659

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.