Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 303 …of Naval Opera- tions; Adm. Ernest J. King, Commander in Chief, U.S. Fleet; Gen. George…
  • p. 316 …So far as the Navy is concerned, Admiral King, as you know, is not only Chief…
  • p. 493 …Admiral King believed that the mines offered a tempting bait to the Japanese who were currently…
  • p. 526 …Hence Admiral King placed a bid for suffi- 461
  • p. 527 …t this stage of the war Admiral King had accepted the belief that his carrier planes…
  • p. 538 …plan by 2 9 June, when Admiral King submitted to the Joint Chiefs a proposal that…
  • p. 607 …type * O n 5 March 1942, Admiral King wrote to General Arnold as follows: “The experience…
  • p. 608 …s.’l A formal request by Admiral King to the Chief of the Army Air Forces…
  • p. 609 …In a letter of 9 March 1942 to Admiral King, he proposed “the estab- lishment of…
  • p. 614 …In June, Admiral King expressed the official Navy position on this point with the utmost clarity…
  • p. 615 …In a memorandum to Admiral King, General McNarney, Deputy Chief of Staff, on 26 May outlined…
  • p. 616 …viewed as a temporary deta~hment.?~ Admiral King’s reaction to these cautious proposals was expressed…
  • p. 618 …the same words as used by Admiral King a month earlier: the answer to the antisubmarine…
  • p. 621 …On 14 September, General Marshall wrote to Admiral King: “Experience with the First Bomber Command in…
  • p. 622 …T o General Marshall’s proposal of 14 September, Admiral King had replied that, although he…
  • p. 641 …54 A week later General Marshall, Admiral King, Harry Hopkins, and a small staff flew to…
  • p. 645 …that scheduled to operate from the United King- dom. Dry topic or no, organization must figure…
  • p. 684 …the principal air task in the United King- dom had long been conceived as strategic bombardment…
  • p. 707 …establishment of base depots in the United King- dom became the basis of action in January…
  • p. 724 …Implicit in all of the arrangements being made in the United King- dom was the belief…
  • p. 788 …Force, Pt. I ; Fleet Adm. Ernest J. King, First Official Report to the Secretary of the…
  • p. 793 …Memo for Adm, King from C/S, 17 Mar. 1 % ~ . 34. JPS 2I/j/D, 7…
  • p. 795 …4 Aug. 1942. 108. Zbid. 109. Adm. King’s Report on Battle of Midway, incl. in…
  • p. 797 …306, 29 June 1942; memos for Adm. King from Mar- shall, 26 June 1942, and for…
  • p. 802 …1942; CM-IN-0629, Chung- king to AGWAR, # # z , 3 Apr. 1942; memo for Gen. Arnold…
  • p. 805 …Ltr., Arnold to King, 2 5 Feb. 1942. certain evidence from all Allied and enemy sources…
  • p. 806 …Memo for King from McNarney, 26 May 1942. 7 1 . Ltr., King to Marshall, 10 June…
  • p. 807 …Ltr., Marshall to King, 14 Sept. 1942, TAB XIVA, in Bowles report; memo for C G…
  • p. 808 …to notes from Mar- shall and Adm. King). 3 2 . A I c m o for…
  • p. 814 …Forces to the United King- dom, App. A, 19 Aug. 1942. 50. Ltr., Col. H.L…
  • p. 851 …C.E., 48-50 Killin, Pfc, 219 Kilner Board, 1 2 0 Kimbolton, 63 I King…
  • p. 854 …in Chief, 515, 5 2 2 , 544. (see also King); controversy over air power vs. battleship…
T H E E I G H T H A I R F O R C E
of the Eighth Air Force in the United Kingdom was a mere 1,87 I
troops and no American aircraft.lg4
By the first of July, a reappraisal of possibilities in the light of new
demands from other theaters had brought a downward revision of
the BOLERO build-up to a total of fifty-four groups less transport
units, and to 194,332 men. The main strength of the Eighth would
be concentrated in seventeen heavy and ten medium bombardment
groups; fighter groups had been reduced to thirteen and light bom-
bardment to three.lg5 These figures served as the basis upon which
plans for the organization and accommodation of the Eighth were
drafted during its first weeks in the United Kingdom. Even with the
reductions forced by considerations of shipping, production, train-
ing, and the demands of other theaters, the proposed build-up under-
scored the ambitious scale on which leaders of the AAF projected
plans for their major effort.
An attempt by AAF Headquarters during early July to extend its
estimate of the BOLERO build-up to 3 I December 1943 lends still
greater emphasis to the point. Planners estimated that the total number
of groups by that date would stand a t 1 3 7 , or approximately half
of the currently projected strength of the AAF. There would be
seventy-four bombardment groups (forty-one heavy, fifteen medium,
thirteen dive, and five light), thirty-one fighter groups, twelve ob-
servation groups, fifteen transport groups, four photo groups, and
one mapping group, and a total of 375,000 men, of which 197,000
would serve in tactical units and 178,000 in the various service or-
g a n i z a t i o n ~ . ~ ~ ~The estimate proved to be remarkably close, par-
ticularly with regard to the heavy bomber force, to the actual strength
established in the United Kingdom in advance of the invasion of 6
June 1944, though the figures given for the number of groups were
high and for the total of personnel low.
In London during July the BOLERO committee continued its
work on plans calling for the accommodation of 195,000 air force
troops, 556,000 ground troops, 259,000 SOS troops, and 137,000 re-
placements, of whom 35,000 would belong to the AAF-all to be
placed in the United Kingdom by the end of March I943.lg7But
at the end of July, as has been noted elsewhere, it had been decided to
abandon SLEDGEHAMMER," to mount instead TORCH, and to
postpone ROUNDUP, probably until 1944. The BOLERO commit-
* See above, pp. 572-73.
65 3

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.