Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 537 …of Air Staff, Plans, Col. Orvil A. Anderson, had in preparation a study of the possibility…
  • p. 757 …Cole O d l e Anderson, CaPt. Ball, Capt. Moss, and himself. The im- portance of…
  • p. 770 …AFSHO files. 9. Lt. Col. O.A. Anderson, AWPD, Air Forces Estimate of the Situation, 1…
  • p. 797 …for C/AS from Col. O.A. Anderson, AC/AS, Plans, 25 June 1942. General Marshall…
  • p. 812 …for Col. George from Maj. S.E. Anderson, Research Regarding Bomber-Fighter Combats in Europe, 1…
  • p. 818 …AC/S, OPD from Col. O.A. Anderson, 10 July 1942. 197. Key Plan for the…
  • p. 840 …5 1 2 Andaman Is., 500, 503 Anderson, Col. 0. A., 472 Andes, 639 Andres, Pvt…
T H E E I G H T H A I R F O R C E
of the Eighth Air Force in the United Kingdom was a mere 1,87 I
troops and no American aircraft.lg4
By the first of July, a reappraisal of possibilities in the light of new
demands from other theaters had brought a downward revision of
the BOLERO build-up to a total of fifty-four groups less transport
units, and to 194,332 men. The main strength of the Eighth would
be concentrated in seventeen heavy and ten medium bombardment
groups; fighter groups had been reduced to thirteen and light bom-
bardment to three.lg5 These figures served as the basis upon which
plans for the organization and accommodation of the Eighth were
drafted during its first weeks in the United Kingdom. Even with the
reductions forced by considerations of shipping, production, train-
ing, and the demands of other theaters, the proposed build-up under-
scored the ambitious scale on which leaders of the AAF projected
plans for their major effort.
An attempt by AAF Headquarters during early July to extend its
estimate of the BOLERO build-up to 3 I December 1943 lends still
greater emphasis to the point. Planners estimated that the total number
of groups by that date would stand a t 1 3 7 , or approximately half
of the currently projected strength of the AAF. There would be
seventy-four bombardment groups (forty-one heavy, fifteen medium,
thirteen dive, and five light), thirty-one fighter groups, twelve ob-
servation groups, fifteen transport groups, four photo groups, and
one mapping group, and a total of 375,000 men, of which 197,000
would serve in tactical units and 178,000 in the various service or-
g a n i z a t i o n ~ . ~ ~ ~The estimate proved to be remarkably close, par-
ticularly with regard to the heavy bomber force, to the actual strength
established in the United Kingdom in advance of the invasion of 6
June 1944, though the figures given for the number of groups were
high and for the total of personnel low.
In London during July the BOLERO committee continued its
work on plans calling for the accommodation of 195,000 air force
troops, 556,000 ground troops, 259,000 SOS troops, and 137,000 re-
placements, of whom 35,000 would belong to the AAF-all to be
placed in the United Kingdom by the end of March I943.lg7But
at the end of July, as has been noted elsewhere, it had been decided to
abandon SLEDGEHAMMER," to mount instead TORCH, and to
postpone ROUNDUP, probably until 1944. The BOLERO commit-
* See above, pp. 572-73.
65 3

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.