Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 303 …of Naval Opera- tions; Adm. Ernest J. King, Commander in Chief, U.S. Fleet; Gen. George…
  • p. 316 …So far as the Navy is concerned, Admiral King, as you know, is not only Chief…
  • p. 493 …Admiral King believed that the mines offered a tempting bait to the Japanese who were currently…
  • p. 526 …Hence Admiral King placed a bid for suffi- 461
  • p. 527 …t this stage of the war Admiral King had accepted the belief that his carrier planes…
  • p. 538 …plan by 2 9 June, when Admiral King submitted to the Joint Chiefs a proposal that…
  • p. 607 …type * O n 5 March 1942, Admiral King wrote to General Arnold as follows: “The experience…
  • p. 608 …s.’l A formal request by Admiral King to the Chief of the Army Air Forces…
  • p. 609 …In a letter of 9 March 1942 to Admiral King, he proposed “the estab- lishment of…
  • p. 614 …In June, Admiral King expressed the official Navy position on this point with the utmost clarity…
  • p. 615 …In a memorandum to Admiral King, General McNarney, Deputy Chief of Staff, on 26 May outlined…
  • p. 616 …viewed as a temporary deta~hment.?~ Admiral King’s reaction to these cautious proposals was expressed…
  • p. 618 …the same words as used by Admiral King a month earlier: the answer to the antisubmarine…
  • p. 621 …On 14 September, General Marshall wrote to Admiral King: “Experience with the First Bomber Command in…
  • p. 622 …T o General Marshall’s proposal of 14 September, Admiral King had replied that, although he…
  • p. 641 …54 A week later General Marshall, Admiral King, Harry Hopkins, and a small staff flew to…
  • p. 645 …that scheduled to operate from the United King- dom. Dry topic or no, organization must figure…
  • p. 684 …the principal air task in the United King- dom had long been conceived as strategic bombardment…
  • p. 707 …establishment of base depots in the United King- dom became the basis of action in January…
  • p. 724 …Implicit in all of the arrangements being made in the United King- dom was the belief…
  • p. 788 …Force, Pt. I ; Fleet Adm. Ernest J. King, First Official Report to the Secretary of the…
  • p. 793 …Memo for Adm, King from C/S, 17 Mar. 1 % ~ . 34. JPS 2I/j/D, 7…
  • p. 795 …4 Aug. 1942. 108. Zbid. 109. Adm. King’s Report on Battle of Midway, incl. in…
  • p. 797 …306, 29 June 1942; memos for Adm. King from Mar- shall, 26 June 1942, and for…
  • p. 802 …1942; CM-IN-0629, Chung- king to AGWAR, # # z , 3 Apr. 1942; memo for Gen. Arnold…
  • p. 805 …Ltr., Arnold to King, 2 5 Feb. 1942. certain evidence from all Allied and enemy sources…
  • p. 806 …Memo for King from McNarney, 26 May 1942. 7 1 . Ltr., King to Marshall, 10 June…
  • p. 807 …Ltr., Marshall to King, 14 Sept. 1942, TAB XIVA, in Bowles report; memo for C G…
  • p. 808 …to notes from Mar- shall and Adm. King). 3 2 . A I c m o for…
  • p. 814 …Forces to the United King- dom, App. A, 19 Aug. 1942. 50. Ltr., Col. H.L…
  • p. 851 …C.E., 48-50 Killin, Pfc, 219 Kilner Board, 1 2 0 Kimbolton, 63 I King…
  • p. 854 …in Chief, 515, 5 2 2 , 544. (see also King); controversy over air power vs. battleship…
T H E A R M Y A I R F O R C E S I N W O R L D W A R I 1
western Europe in the spring of 1943, a plan for the build-up and
accommodation of American forces in the United Kingdom had been
initiated in late April under the code name of BOLER0.lDoCom-
bined committees of British and American members, their province
falling entirely in the field of logistics, were set up in Washington
and London to expedite arrangements for the build-up. Composed of
key staff officers of the several planning agencies concerned, these
committees served to co-ordinate the effort on the highest level.
With April 1943 set tentatively as the target date for ROUNDUP,
the Operations Division of the War Department and AAF Head-
quarters in May 1942 drafted plans to place by that time I,OOO,OOO
American troops in the United Kingdom. The troop basis was broken
down to provide 525,000 ground troops, 240,000 air force troops,
and 235,000 for Services of Supply.1D1Within the limit thus set, the
AAF by I 3 May had developed a “Rough Estimate-Tentative” which
called for the placing in the United Kingdom prior to I April 1943
of twenty-one heavy bombardment groups, eight medium bombard-
ment groups, nine light bombardment groups, seventeen pursuit
groups, six observation groups, and eight transport groups-the grand
total being sixty-nine groups plus supporting service units.lgz As the
figures themselves indicate, the force would represent a balance be-
tween the requirements of a previously planned program of strategic
bombardment and of the tactical operations to be expected in the
actual invasion of Europe.
A further development and refinement of these studies enabled
General Arnold during his conferences with Air Chief Marshal Portal
in late May to present a “Programme of Arrival of U.S. Army Air
Forces in the United Kingdom” which provided for a flow into the
theater by March 1943 of sixty-six combat groups, exclusive of ob-
servation squadrons, and of 3,649 airplanes. The breakdown had been
adjusted as follows: for bombardment, nineteen heavy, twelve me-
dium, and twelve light groups; for pursuit, fifteen groups; and for
transport, eight. The proposed build-up would advance from fifteen
groups in July to thirty-five in November and to sixty-six in March.
General Arnold anticipated that by I April 1943 the Eighth would
have in combat units 700 heavy bombers, 800 medium bombers, 342
light bombers, and 960 fighters.Ig3 At the time of General Arnold’s
departure from London for home on 2 June 1942, the actual strength
6 5 2

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.