Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 303 …of Naval Opera- tions; Adm. Ernest J. King, Commander in Chief, U.S. Fleet; Gen. George…
  • p. 316 …So far as the Navy is concerned, Admiral King, as you know, is not only Chief…
  • p. 493 …Admiral King believed that the mines offered a tempting bait to the Japanese who were currently…
  • p. 526 …Hence Admiral King placed a bid for suffi- 461
  • p. 527 …t this stage of the war Admiral King had accepted the belief that his carrier planes…
  • p. 538 …plan by 2 9 June, when Admiral King submitted to the Joint Chiefs a proposal that…
  • p. 607 …type * O n 5 March 1942, Admiral King wrote to General Arnold as follows: “The experience…
  • p. 608 …s.’l A formal request by Admiral King to the Chief of the Army Air Forces…
  • p. 609 …In a letter of 9 March 1942 to Admiral King, he proposed “the estab- lishment of…
  • p. 614 …In June, Admiral King expressed the official Navy position on this point with the utmost clarity…
  • p. 615 …In a memorandum to Admiral King, General McNarney, Deputy Chief of Staff, on 26 May outlined…
  • p. 616 …viewed as a temporary deta~hment.?~ Admiral King’s reaction to these cautious proposals was expressed…
  • p. 618 …the same words as used by Admiral King a month earlier: the answer to the antisubmarine…
  • p. 621 …On 14 September, General Marshall wrote to Admiral King: “Experience with the First Bomber Command in…
  • p. 622 …T o General Marshall’s proposal of 14 September, Admiral King had replied that, although he…
  • p. 641 …54 A week later General Marshall, Admiral King, Harry Hopkins, and a small staff flew to…
  • p. 645 …that scheduled to operate from the United King- dom. Dry topic or no, organization must figure…
  • p. 684 …the principal air task in the United King- dom had long been conceived as strategic bombardment…
  • p. 707 …establishment of base depots in the United King- dom became the basis of action in January…
  • p. 724 …Implicit in all of the arrangements being made in the United King- dom was the belief…
  • p. 788 …Force, Pt. I ; Fleet Adm. Ernest J. King, First Official Report to the Secretary of the…
  • p. 793 …Memo for Adm, King from C/S, 17 Mar. 1 % ~ . 34. JPS 2I/j/D, 7…
  • p. 795 …4 Aug. 1942. 108. Zbid. 109. Adm. King’s Report on Battle of Midway, incl. in…
  • p. 797 …306, 29 June 1942; memos for Adm. King from Mar- shall, 26 June 1942, and for…
  • p. 802 …1942; CM-IN-0629, Chung- king to AGWAR, # # z , 3 Apr. 1942; memo for Gen. Arnold…
  • p. 805 …Ltr., Arnold to King, 2 5 Feb. 1942. certain evidence from all Allied and enemy sources…
  • p. 806 …Memo for King from McNarney, 26 May 1942. 7 1 . Ltr., King to Marshall, 10 June…
  • p. 807 …Ltr., Marshall to King, 14 Sept. 1942, TAB XIVA, in Bowles report; memo for C G…
  • p. 808 …to notes from Mar- shall and Adm. King). 3 2 . A I c m o for…
  • p. 814 …Forces to the United King- dom, App. A, 19 Aug. 1942. 50. Ltr., Col. H.L…
  • p. 851 …C.E., 48-50 Killin, Pfc, 219 Kilner Board, 1 2 0 Kimbolton, 63 I King…
  • p. 854 …in Chief, 515, 5 2 2 , 544. (see also King); controversy over air power vs. battleship…
T H E A R M Y A I R F O R C E S I N W O R L D W A R I 1
reins of command and assumed the responsibility for planning which
theretofore had belonged chiefly to the VIII Bomber
It is not surprising that the VIII Bomber Command under General
Eaker was in many ways further advanced than were any of the other
commands, for its staff enjoyed by far the widest experience in coping
with problems peculiar to the theater. Already in mid-June the
bomber command had taken a significant step toward the develop-
ment of adequate machinery for the control of combat operations by
establishing the Provisional I st Bombardment Wing at Brampton
Grange under the command of Col. Claude E. Duncan, who had
been in the theater since January. Still another step came on 27
July with the full-fledged activation of both the 1st and zd Bom-
bardment Wings; the command of the latter, at Old Catton in Nor-
folk, was given to Col. Newton Longfellow, who on that day landed
at Prestwick to complete the first BOLERO movement.lel There
would be some reshuffling of the paper over the next few weeks: the
two wings were dependent upon action in the United States for pro-
vision of necessary headquarters personnel, and headquarters and
headquarters squadrons meanwhile having been established in the
States for each of the wings, the theater organizations were redesig-
nated “provisional” in August and re-established on a permanent basis
in September.162But all this was for the sake of the record; a t the
end of August the 97th, 301st, and 92d Groups had been assigned to
the 1st Wing,lB3while the zd Wing awaited the early arrival of its
headquarters squadron and additional combat groups.
Arnold and Portal had agreed in May that the American fighter
units would be stationed at first with RAF fighters in southern Eng-
land. General Hunter’s headquarters, accordingly, was opened on
28 July, shortly after his arrival in the theater, at Bushey Hall, Wat-
ford, on the outskirts of northwest London and within easy reach of
the headquarters of the RAF Fighter Command.ls4 There were four
American fighter groups in the theater a month later, all of them-
the 1st and 14th with their P-38’s and the 31st and 52d with Spit-
fires-stationed on RAJ? fields and already showing progress in the
mastery of RAF procedures and techniques of contr01.l~~
T h e VIII Ground Air Support Command under Brig. Gen. Robert
C. Candee did not open its headquarters at Membury in Berkshire,
about fifty miles west of London, until 17 August, after close study
of RAF organization for air-ground co-operation.lae Its mission being
646

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.