Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 303 …of Naval Opera- tions; Adm. Ernest J. King, Commander in Chief, U.S. Fleet; Gen. George…
  • p. 316 …So far as the Navy is concerned, Admiral King, as you know, is not only Chief…
  • p. 493 …Admiral King believed that the mines offered a tempting bait to the Japanese who were currently…
  • p. 526 …Hence Admiral King placed a bid for suffi- 461
  • p. 527 …t this stage of the war Admiral King had accepted the belief that his carrier planes…
  • p. 538 …plan by 2 9 June, when Admiral King submitted to the Joint Chiefs a proposal that…
  • p. 607 …type * O n 5 March 1942, Admiral King wrote to General Arnold as follows: “The experience…
  • p. 608 …s.’l A formal request by Admiral King to the Chief of the Army Air Forces…
  • p. 609 …In a letter of 9 March 1942 to Admiral King, he proposed “the estab- lishment of…
  • p. 614 …In June, Admiral King expressed the official Navy position on this point with the utmost clarity…
  • p. 615 …In a memorandum to Admiral King, General McNarney, Deputy Chief of Staff, on 26 May outlined…
  • p. 616 …viewed as a temporary deta~hment.?~ Admiral King’s reaction to these cautious proposals was expressed…
  • p. 618 …the same words as used by Admiral King a month earlier: the answer to the antisubmarine…
  • p. 621 …On 14 September, General Marshall wrote to Admiral King: “Experience with the First Bomber Command in…
  • p. 622 …T o General Marshall’s proposal of 14 September, Admiral King had replied that, although he…
  • p. 641 …54 A week later General Marshall, Admiral King, Harry Hopkins, and a small staff flew to…
  • p. 645 …that scheduled to operate from the United King- dom. Dry topic or no, organization must figure…
  • p. 684 …the principal air task in the United King- dom had long been conceived as strategic bombardment…
  • p. 707 …establishment of base depots in the United King- dom became the basis of action in January…
  • p. 724 …Implicit in all of the arrangements being made in the United King- dom was the belief…
  • p. 788 …Force, Pt. I ; Fleet Adm. Ernest J. King, First Official Report to the Secretary of the…
  • p. 793 …Memo for Adm, King from C/S, 17 Mar. 1 % ~ . 34. JPS 2I/j/D, 7…
  • p. 795 …4 Aug. 1942. 108. Zbid. 109. Adm. King’s Report on Battle of Midway, incl. in…
  • p. 797 …306, 29 June 1942; memos for Adm. King from Mar- shall, 26 June 1942, and for…
  • p. 802 …1942; CM-IN-0629, Chung- king to AGWAR, # # z , 3 Apr. 1942; memo for Gen. Arnold…
  • p. 805 …Ltr., Arnold to King, 2 5 Feb. 1942. certain evidence from all Allied and enemy sources…
  • p. 806 …Memo for King from McNarney, 26 May 1942. 7 1 . Ltr., King to Marshall, 10 June…
  • p. 807 …Ltr., Marshall to King, 14 Sept. 1942, TAB XIVA, in Bowles report; memo for C G…
  • p. 808 …to notes from Mar- shall and Adm. King). 3 2 . A I c m o for…
  • p. 814 …Forces to the United King- dom, App. A, 19 Aug. 1942. 50. Ltr., Col. H.L…
  • p. 851 …C.E., 48-50 Killin, Pfc, 219 Kilner Board, 1 2 0 Kimbolton, 63 I King…
  • p. 854 …in Chief, 515, 5 2 2 , 544. (see also King); controversy over air power vs. battleship…
T H E A R M Y A I R F O R C E S I N W O R L D W A R I 1
not fall within the province of the base depot,” nor could it be per-
formed at combat stations without a wasteful dispersion of ikilled
personnel. The need was for an advance depot, or depots, through
which supplies from the base depots could be distributed to combat
stations, and at which urgent maintenance and repair beyond the
capacities of the combat group could be provided.”‘ The bomber
command plan of 2 0 March recommended that a “mobile air depot,”
the standard AAF designation for that type of service organization
and a term reflecting the emphasis on mobility in the earlier GHQ
Air Force, be established a t Molesworth in Huntingdonshire.”* Dur-
ing the spring, planning agencies in the United States as well as those
in England gave attention to the need for a complete service organi-
zation and the placing of air depot groups within reach of the combat
stations.lle But whether because of the almost overwhelming number
of tasks requiring attention and a natural tendency to give first place
to the fundamental problem of the base depot, or because of a certain
difficulty in shifting the emphasis from a mobile to a static system,
Eaker was compelled to report to Spaatz in May that the principal
lag in the development of an adequate organization in Britain fell in
the general area of “the Air Service Command Depots and establish-
ments.”120Not until after the arrival of the VIII Air Force Service
Command in July was a comprehensive plan fully developed.
Another phase of the problem that required close attention was the
securing of adequate storage space in a country already strained in
this particular virtually to capacity. In the location of base depots the
question of storage had been a major consideration, but it became
evident that these establishments could not meet the need, and in
June steps were taken to find a total of 3,000,000 square feet. By the
end of the month the Eighth had secured approximately 750,000
square feet, and another 1,160,000 square feet not yet available had
been located. Storage areas fell in general in the neighborhood of the
western ports of Liverpool and Bristol, with additional space at Bur-
ton-on-Trent northwest of Huntingdon, and in Northern Ireland.lZ1
With the formal establishment of the Eighth Air Force in the
United Kingdom at the end of June, its service organization still
remained largely in the stage of planning and construction. The plans
had been drawn on an ambitious scale and in keeping with the AAF’s
* Langford Lodge, originally conceived by General Brett as performing third
echelon maintenance, was now to be a base depot for fourth echelon maintenance.
63 8

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.