Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 303 …of Naval Opera- tions; Adm. Ernest J. King, Commander in Chief, U.S. Fleet; Gen. George…
  • p. 316 …So far as the Navy is concerned, Admiral King, as you know, is not only Chief…
  • p. 493 …Admiral King believed that the mines offered a tempting bait to the Japanese who were currently…
  • p. 526 …Hence Admiral King placed a bid for suffi- 461
  • p. 527 …t this stage of the war Admiral King had accepted the belief that his carrier planes…
  • p. 538 …plan by 2 9 June, when Admiral King submitted to the Joint Chiefs a proposal that…
  • p. 607 …type * O n 5 March 1942, Admiral King wrote to General Arnold as follows: “The experience…
  • p. 608 …s.’l A formal request by Admiral King to the Chief of the Army Air Forces…
  • p. 609 …In a letter of 9 March 1942 to Admiral King, he proposed “the estab- lishment of…
  • p. 614 …In June, Admiral King expressed the official Navy position on this point with the utmost clarity…
  • p. 615 …In a memorandum to Admiral King, General McNarney, Deputy Chief of Staff, on 26 May outlined…
  • p. 616 …viewed as a temporary deta~hment.?~ Admiral King’s reaction to these cautious proposals was expressed…
  • p. 618 …the same words as used by Admiral King a month earlier: the answer to the antisubmarine…
  • p. 621 …On 14 September, General Marshall wrote to Admiral King: “Experience with the First Bomber Command in…
  • p. 622 …T o General Marshall’s proposal of 14 September, Admiral King had replied that, although he…
  • p. 641 …54 A week later General Marshall, Admiral King, Harry Hopkins, and a small staff flew to…
  • p. 645 …that scheduled to operate from the United King- dom. Dry topic or no, organization must figure…
  • p. 684 …the principal air task in the United King- dom had long been conceived as strategic bombardment…
  • p. 707 …establishment of base depots in the United King- dom became the basis of action in January…
  • p. 724 …Implicit in all of the arrangements being made in the United King- dom was the belief…
  • p. 788 …Force, Pt. I ; Fleet Adm. Ernest J. King, First Official Report to the Secretary of the…
  • p. 793 …Memo for Adm, King from C/S, 17 Mar. 1 % ~ . 34. JPS 2I/j/D, 7…
  • p. 795 …4 Aug. 1942. 108. Zbid. 109. Adm. King’s Report on Battle of Midway, incl. in…
  • p. 797 …306, 29 June 1942; memos for Adm. King from Mar- shall, 26 June 1942, and for…
  • p. 802 …1942; CM-IN-0629, Chung- king to AGWAR, # # z , 3 Apr. 1942; memo for Gen. Arnold…
  • p. 805 …Ltr., Arnold to King, 2 5 Feb. 1942. certain evidence from all Allied and enemy sources…
  • p. 806 …Memo for King from McNarney, 26 May 1942. 7 1 . Ltr., King to Marshall, 10 June…
  • p. 807 …Ltr., Marshall to King, 14 Sept. 1942, TAB XIVA, in Bowles report; memo for C G…
  • p. 808 …to notes from Mar- shall and Adm. King). 3 2 . A I c m o for…
  • p. 814 …Forces to the United King- dom, App. A, 19 Aug. 1942. 50. Ltr., Col. H.L…
  • p. 851 …C.E., 48-50 Killin, Pfc, 219 Kilner Board, 1 2 0 Kimbolton, 63 I King…
  • p. 854 …in Chief, 515, 5 2 2 , 544. (see also King); controversy over air power vs. battleship…
T H E E I G H T H A I R F O R C E
plan under which the transfer was sought called for the existing Brit-
ish technical staff to continue in service there until American tech-
nicians became available, and for centralization at Burtonwood of the
supply and repair of U.S.-built aircraft in use by the RAF. This
would be a step toward inauguration of a policy already agreed upon
that would leave to the AAF responsibility for the supply and main-
tenance (including modification) of all American-built planes operated
from the United Kingdom."' The urgent need behind the request
received emphasis from Arnold's revelation that current plans pro-
posed to place 1,000 American planes for operation in the United
Kingdom by 15 August 1942 and 3,500 by April 1943. Until Lang-
ford Lodge and Warton were ready for operation-target dates then
stood at October I 942 and January I 943, respectively-Burtonwood
would have to serve instead.
During May, consultations in England and in Washington moved
toward a prompt understanding with the Ministry of Aircraft Pro-
duction. By the z3d of the month, General Chaney and the ministry
had reached a detailed agreement on a plan to transfer Burtonwood
to the exclusive control of the Americans following an interval of
joint operation."* This joint control began a t the end of June, with
the VIII Air Force Service Command acting as the American agent.'13
The technical staff of the British was largely civilian; and in the
absence of an adequate number of skilled American military personnel,
General Arnold had directed that civilian technicians be drawn from
AAF depots in the United States for service as the Civil Service
Detachment a t B u r t o n ~ o o d . " ~Lockheed, also, was preparing in June
to send some 1,500 civilians to man Langford Lodge.'15 Thus a t the
beginning the first two base air depots in Britain were staffed almost
entirely by civilian workers. This arrangement was regarded, how-
ever, as a temporary measure, and General Spaan intended that
eventually all depots would be operated exclusively by military per-
sonnel.*le
Although the distance between the base depot area around Liver-
pool and the sector to be occupied by combat units was not great by
American standards, there nevertheless were considerations which
dictated the placing of advance depots nearer the combat bases in
Huntingdonshire and East Anglia. Efficiency of operation on the
scale planned for the Eighth required ready access to spare parts and
other supplies; moreover, third echelon repair of battle damage did
63 7

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.