Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 303 …of Naval Opera- tions; Adm. Ernest J. King, Commander in Chief, U.S. Fleet; Gen. George…
  • p. 316 …So far as the Navy is concerned, Admiral King, as you know, is not only Chief…
  • p. 493 …Admiral King believed that the mines offered a tempting bait to the Japanese who were currently…
  • p. 526 …Hence Admiral King placed a bid for suffi- 461
  • p. 527 …t this stage of the war Admiral King had accepted the belief that his carrier planes…
  • p. 538 …plan by 2 9 June, when Admiral King submitted to the Joint Chiefs a proposal that…
  • p. 607 …type * O n 5 March 1942, Admiral King wrote to General Arnold as follows: “The experience…
  • p. 608 …s.’l A formal request by Admiral King to the Chief of the Army Air Forces…
  • p. 609 …In a letter of 9 March 1942 to Admiral King, he proposed “the estab- lishment of…
  • p. 614 …In June, Admiral King expressed the official Navy position on this point with the utmost clarity…
  • p. 615 …In a memorandum to Admiral King, General McNarney, Deputy Chief of Staff, on 26 May outlined…
  • p. 616 …viewed as a temporary deta~hment.?~ Admiral King’s reaction to these cautious proposals was expressed…
  • p. 618 …the same words as used by Admiral King a month earlier: the answer to the antisubmarine…
  • p. 621 …On 14 September, General Marshall wrote to Admiral King: “Experience with the First Bomber Command in…
  • p. 622 …T o General Marshall’s proposal of 14 September, Admiral King had replied that, although he…
  • p. 641 …54 A week later General Marshall, Admiral King, Harry Hopkins, and a small staff flew to…
  • p. 645 …that scheduled to operate from the United King- dom. Dry topic or no, organization must figure…
  • p. 684 …the principal air task in the United King- dom had long been conceived as strategic bombardment…
  • p. 707 …establishment of base depots in the United King- dom became the basis of action in January…
  • p. 724 …Implicit in all of the arrangements being made in the United King- dom was the belief…
  • p. 788 …Force, Pt. I ; Fleet Adm. Ernest J. King, First Official Report to the Secretary of the…
  • p. 793 …Memo for Adm, King from C/S, 17 Mar. 1 % ~ . 34. JPS 2I/j/D, 7…
  • p. 795 …4 Aug. 1942. 108. Zbid. 109. Adm. King’s Report on Battle of Midway, incl. in…
  • p. 797 …306, 29 June 1942; memos for Adm. King from Mar- shall, 26 June 1942, and for…
  • p. 802 …1942; CM-IN-0629, Chung- king to AGWAR, # # z , 3 Apr. 1942; memo for Gen. Arnold…
  • p. 805 …Ltr., Arnold to King, 2 5 Feb. 1942. certain evidence from all Allied and enemy sources…
  • p. 806 …Memo for King from McNarney, 26 May 1942. 7 1 . Ltr., King to Marshall, 10 June…
  • p. 807 …Ltr., Marshall to King, 14 Sept. 1942, TAB XIVA, in Bowles report; memo for C G…
  • p. 808 …to notes from Mar- shall and Adm. King). 3 2 . A I c m o for…
  • p. 814 …Forces to the United King- dom, App. A, 19 Aug. 1942. 50. Ltr., Col. H.L…
  • p. 851 …C.E., 48-50 Killin, Pfc, 219 Kilner Board, 1 2 0 Kimbolton, 63 I King…
  • p. 854 …in Chief, 515, 5 2 2 , 544. (see also King); controversy over air power vs. battleship…
T H E A R M Y A I R F O R C E S I N W O R L D W A R I 1
a subsidiary designated for operation of the depot, was not signed
until I May 1942. But Lockheed representatives began to survey the
site and to draft detailed plans from late December, and the Ministry
of Aircraft Production promptly began construction under the pro-
vision of a letter of intent furnished by the Materiel Command in
the United States in January.loS
General Brett during the preceding October had inspected other
areas of the United Kingdom with a view to the probable need of the
AAF for another depot. H e finally settled on Warton, about twenty-
five miles north of Liverpool and close to the excellent industrial and
transportation facilities of Lancashire, a selection concurred in by
Col. Donald Davison, engineer officer of SPOBS.'"' Brett's recom-
mendations for the establishment of base depots in the United King-
dom became the basis of action in January, when General Arnold
directed that they be given effect "insofar as the present situation
permits." lo*By March, detailed agreement had been reached between
USAFBI and British authorities for the development of Warton as
a base air depot for the AAF. But even with the substantial aid to an
early completion provided by the surveys and consultations of 1941,
it would be 1944 before all of the base air depots were prepared to
assume fully the roles envisioned for them.
Meanwhile, the third of the great depots that would form the bed-
rock on which the structure of AAF operations from the United
Kingdom would rest had come into the picture through the necessity
to provide some interim establishment. In keeping with principles laid
down in the Air Ministry document, Joint Organization and Main-
tenance (United States), and with recommendations by General
Eaker in March,lo9 a search was undertaken for existing facilities
that could be put almost immediately into use. The choice fell on the
British repair depot at Burtonwood, which, as events proved, was
destined to become the greatest of American overseas depots and to
serve as the very heart of AAF supply and maintenance in the Euro-
pean Theater of Operations. Located midway between Liverpool
and Manchester in the heart of Lancashire and served by good trans-
portation, Burtonwood already was engaged in the repair of Ameri-
can-built airframes and engines. Both General Eaker and Colonel
Lyon inspected the installation in April, and acting on strong recom-
mendations forwarded by General Chaney, General Arnold imme-
diately initiated action to secure its transfer for American use.'l0 The
636

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.