Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 303 …of Naval Opera- tions; Adm. Ernest J. King, Commander in Chief, U.S. Fleet; Gen. George…
  • p. 316 …So far as the Navy is concerned, Admiral King, as you know, is not only Chief…
  • p. 493 …Admiral King believed that the mines offered a tempting bait to the Japanese who were currently…
  • p. 526 …Hence Admiral King placed a bid for suffi- 461
  • p. 527 …t this stage of the war Admiral King had accepted the belief that his carrier planes…
  • p. 538 …plan by 2 9 June, when Admiral King submitted to the Joint Chiefs a proposal that…
  • p. 607 …type * O n 5 March 1942, Admiral King wrote to General Arnold as follows: “The experience…
  • p. 608 …s.’l A formal request by Admiral King to the Chief of the Army Air Forces…
  • p. 609 …In a letter of 9 March 1942 to Admiral King, he proposed “the estab- lishment of…
  • p. 614 …In June, Admiral King expressed the official Navy position on this point with the utmost clarity…
  • p. 615 …In a memorandum to Admiral King, General McNarney, Deputy Chief of Staff, on 26 May outlined…
  • p. 616 …viewed as a temporary deta~hment.?~ Admiral King’s reaction to these cautious proposals was expressed…
  • p. 618 …the same words as used by Admiral King a month earlier: the answer to the antisubmarine…
  • p. 621 …On 14 September, General Marshall wrote to Admiral King: “Experience with the First Bomber Command in…
  • p. 622 …T o General Marshall’s proposal of 14 September, Admiral King had replied that, although he…
  • p. 641 …54 A week later General Marshall, Admiral King, Harry Hopkins, and a small staff flew to…
  • p. 645 …that scheduled to operate from the United King- dom. Dry topic or no, organization must figure…
  • p. 684 …the principal air task in the United King- dom had long been conceived as strategic bombardment…
  • p. 707 …establishment of base depots in the United King- dom became the basis of action in January…
  • p. 724 …Implicit in all of the arrangements being made in the United King- dom was the belief…
  • p. 788 …Force, Pt. I ; Fleet Adm. Ernest J. King, First Official Report to the Secretary of the…
  • p. 793 …Memo for Adm, King from C/S, 17 Mar. 1 % ~ . 34. JPS 2I/j/D, 7…
  • p. 795 …4 Aug. 1942. 108. Zbid. 109. Adm. King’s Report on Battle of Midway, incl. in…
  • p. 797 …306, 29 June 1942; memos for Adm. King from Mar- shall, 26 June 1942, and for…
  • p. 802 …1942; CM-IN-0629, Chung- king to AGWAR, # # z , 3 Apr. 1942; memo for Gen. Arnold…
  • p. 805 …Ltr., Arnold to King, 2 5 Feb. 1942. certain evidence from all Allied and enemy sources…
  • p. 806 …Memo for King from McNarney, 26 May 1942. 7 1 . Ltr., King to Marshall, 10 June…
  • p. 807 …Ltr., Marshall to King, 14 Sept. 1942, TAB XIVA, in Bowles report; memo for C G…
  • p. 808 …to notes from Mar- shall and Adm. King). 3 2 . A I c m o for…
  • p. 814 …Forces to the United King- dom, App. A, 19 Aug. 1942. 50. Ltr., Col. H.L…
  • p. 851 …C.E., 48-50 Killin, Pfc, 219 Kilner Board, 1 2 0 Kimbolton, 63 I King…
  • p. 854 …in Chief, 515, 5 2 2 , 544. (see also King); controversy over air power vs. battleship…
T H E A R M Y A I R F O R C E S I N W O R L D W A R I 1
the latter policy had in effect already been adopted, as General Eaker
well understood.
It had been decided in December 1941that American bomber units,
a t least initially, would be based in the general area of Huntingdon
and East Anglia, a section of England lying above London and known
to Americans chiefly as a principal source of the Puritan emigration
to New England in the seventeenth century. Because of the time
required for the construction of airdromes and their fundamental
importance to any plan for combined operations, the British and
American staffs had given the question consideration at an early date.
According to information used by the American Air Staff in August
I 94 I , when it was engaged in the drafting of AWPD/ I , there would
be available for American use after the RAF had reached maximum
strength 105 airdromes for bombers and 2 5 for pursuit planes.s6 Told
of the scale of operations contemplated by the Americans, the RAF
notified the AAF in the following December that airdrome accom-
modations for 2 , 3 0 0 American heavy bombers could be made ready
by June 1943." American officers had undertaken in October and
November a survey of airfields proposed for our use in the United
Kingdom, where a total of 1 5 airdromes-8 in England, 2 in Scotland,
and 5 in Northern Ireland-were earmarked for American use by the
RAF." In December, plans finally narrowed the selection of air-
dromes to be prepared for the first American bomber units to 8 fields
then under construction for No. 8 Group of RAF Bomber Command
in the Huntingdon area.ss Though not completed until well into 1942,
they were ready to receive the American flyers in June.
While the construction of bases proceeded, Generals Arnold and
Eaker raised the question of the advisability of locating the American
forces in the more northerly region of Yorkshire. There the bombers
would be closer to projected supply and maintenance facilities in the
neighborhood of Liverpool. In addition to the saving on transporta-
tion, Arnold and Eaker felt that the York area possibly offered
greater room for expansion.goThe suggestion received some support
among responsible officers of the RAF, but it would have involved
readjustment of plans to which considerable commitments already
had been made and a sacrifice of advantages to be derived from the
close proximity of the American and British bomber commands.
Accordingly, by early May the question had been definitely decided
in favor of the Huntingdon area.g1 In this area and adjacent parts of
630

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.