Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 303 …of Naval Opera- tions; Adm. Ernest J. King, Commander in Chief, U.S. Fleet; Gen. George…
  • p. 316 …So far as the Navy is concerned, Admiral King, as you know, is not only Chief…
  • p. 493 …Admiral King believed that the mines offered a tempting bait to the Japanese who were currently…
  • p. 526 …Hence Admiral King placed a bid for suffi- 461
  • p. 527 …t this stage of the war Admiral King had accepted the belief that his carrier planes…
  • p. 538 …plan by 2 9 June, when Admiral King submitted to the Joint Chiefs a proposal that…
  • p. 607 …type * O n 5 March 1942, Admiral King wrote to General Arnold as follows: “The experience…
  • p. 608 …s.’l A formal request by Admiral King to the Chief of the Army Air Forces…
  • p. 609 …In a letter of 9 March 1942 to Admiral King, he proposed “the estab- lishment of…
  • p. 614 …In June, Admiral King expressed the official Navy position on this point with the utmost clarity…
  • p. 615 …In a memorandum to Admiral King, General McNarney, Deputy Chief of Staff, on 26 May outlined…
  • p. 616 …viewed as a temporary deta~hment.?~ Admiral King’s reaction to these cautious proposals was expressed…
  • p. 618 …the same words as used by Admiral King a month earlier: the answer to the antisubmarine…
  • p. 621 …On 14 September, General Marshall wrote to Admiral King: “Experience with the First Bomber Command in…
  • p. 622 …T o General Marshall’s proposal of 14 September, Admiral King had replied that, although he…
  • p. 641 …54 A week later General Marshall, Admiral King, Harry Hopkins, and a small staff flew to…
  • p. 645 …that scheduled to operate from the United King- dom. Dry topic or no, organization must figure…
  • p. 684 …the principal air task in the United King- dom had long been conceived as strategic bombardment…
  • p. 707 …establishment of base depots in the United King- dom became the basis of action in January…
  • p. 724 …Implicit in all of the arrangements being made in the United King- dom was the belief…
  • p. 788 …Force, Pt. I ; Fleet Adm. Ernest J. King, First Official Report to the Secretary of the…
  • p. 793 …Memo for Adm, King from C/S, 17 Mar. 1 % ~ . 34. JPS 2I/j/D, 7…
  • p. 795 …4 Aug. 1942. 108. Zbid. 109. Adm. King’s Report on Battle of Midway, incl. in…
  • p. 797 …306, 29 June 1942; memos for Adm. King from Mar- shall, 26 June 1942, and for…
  • p. 802 …1942; CM-IN-0629, Chung- king to AGWAR, # # z , 3 Apr. 1942; memo for Gen. Arnold…
  • p. 805 …Ltr., Arnold to King, 2 5 Feb. 1942. certain evidence from all Allied and enemy sources…
  • p. 806 …Memo for King from McNarney, 26 May 1942. 7 1 . Ltr., King to Marshall, 10 June…
  • p. 807 …Ltr., Marshall to King, 14 Sept. 1942, TAB XIVA, in Bowles report; memo for C G…
  • p. 808 …to notes from Mar- shall and Adm. King). 3 2 . A I c m o for…
  • p. 814 …Forces to the United King- dom, App. A, 19 Aug. 1942. 50. Ltr., Col. H.L…
  • p. 851 …C.E., 48-50 Killin, Pfc, 219 Kilner Board, 1 2 0 Kimbolton, 63 I King…
  • p. 854 …in Chief, 515, 5 2 2 , 544. (see also King); controversy over air power vs. battleship…
T H E E I G H T H A I R F O R C E
gated to him by General Chaney. Before Pearl Harbor, his activities
had been conditioned largely by deployment plans stipulated in the
W a r Department strategic plan RAINBOW No. 5 and by the im-
plications of air lend-lease. Preliminary and necessarily tentative plans,
made in consultation with British officials, had centered on such
questions as the accommodation of American air units, the training
of AAF technical personnel by the RAF, and the establishment of
US.-managed depots to service the RAF’s American-built planes.
T h e progress made toward a common understanding of some
of the more fundamental problems greatly facilitated collaboration
between the air arms of the two nations after December 1941. As
early as February 1942,the British Air Ministry had prepared for
its guidance a comprehensive statement of policy and procedure
which was circulated under the title of Joint Organization and Main-
tenance (United States). This document provided a sound foundation
for Anglo-American co-operation in the establishment of the Eighth
Air Force, and was kept current through the ensuing years by a series
of amendments shaped in conferences between British and American
officials. Its constructive contribution to a solution of the problems
involved in receiving, accommodating, and servicing an American
air force was promptly supplemented by the practice of establishing
special sections within the major divisions of the Air Ministry for
handling American question^.^^ Recognizing the tremendous impor-
tance of the effort to build a great American air force in the United
Kingdom, the Air Ministry prepared to play its part by the most care-
ful and detailed planning.
General Eaker’s bomber command plan of 2 0 March contributed
a further clarification of the problems to be faced. Setting forth an
“Ideal Method” that would have required the development of an
independent system of supply and maintenance, complete with base
depots, before the initiation of combat operations, the plan recog-
nized that a consequent postponement of our active participation in
the European air war until the end of 1942 could hardly be coun-
tenanced. T h e alternative, which called for extensive use of British
facilities and assistance at the outset, on the other hand, would permit
an earlier inauguration of operations against the enemy and the build-
ing of an American logistical organization concurrently with their
d e ~ e l o p m e n t . ~ ~There was of course little room for debate. Indeed,
629

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.