Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 303 …of Naval Opera- tions; Adm. Ernest J. King, Commander in Chief, U.S. Fleet; Gen. George…
  • p. 316 …So far as the Navy is concerned, Admiral King, as you know, is not only Chief…
  • p. 493 …Admiral King believed that the mines offered a tempting bait to the Japanese who were currently…
  • p. 526 …Hence Admiral King placed a bid for suffi- 461
  • p. 527 …t this stage of the war Admiral King had accepted the belief that his carrier planes…
  • p. 538 …plan by 2 9 June, when Admiral King submitted to the Joint Chiefs a proposal that…
  • p. 607 …type * O n 5 March 1942, Admiral King wrote to General Arnold as follows: “The experience…
  • p. 608 …s.’l A formal request by Admiral King to the Chief of the Army Air Forces…
  • p. 609 …In a letter of 9 March 1942 to Admiral King, he proposed “the estab- lishment of…
  • p. 614 …In June, Admiral King expressed the official Navy position on this point with the utmost clarity…
  • p. 615 …In a memorandum to Admiral King, General McNarney, Deputy Chief of Staff, on 26 May outlined…
  • p. 616 …viewed as a temporary deta~hment.?~ Admiral King’s reaction to these cautious proposals was expressed…
  • p. 618 …the same words as used by Admiral King a month earlier: the answer to the antisubmarine…
  • p. 621 …On 14 September, General Marshall wrote to Admiral King: “Experience with the First Bomber Command in…
  • p. 622 …T o General Marshall’s proposal of 14 September, Admiral King had replied that, although he…
  • p. 641 …54 A week later General Marshall, Admiral King, Harry Hopkins, and a small staff flew to…
  • p. 645 …that scheduled to operate from the United King- dom. Dry topic or no, organization must figure…
  • p. 684 …the principal air task in the United King- dom had long been conceived as strategic bombardment…
  • p. 707 …establishment of base depots in the United King- dom became the basis of action in January…
  • p. 724 …Implicit in all of the arrangements being made in the United King- dom was the belief…
  • p. 788 …Force, Pt. I ; Fleet Adm. Ernest J. King, First Official Report to the Secretary of the…
  • p. 793 …Memo for Adm, King from C/S, 17 Mar. 1 % ~ . 34. JPS 2I/j/D, 7…
  • p. 795 …4 Aug. 1942. 108. Zbid. 109. Adm. King’s Report on Battle of Midway, incl. in…
  • p. 797 …306, 29 June 1942; memos for Adm. King from Mar- shall, 26 June 1942, and for…
  • p. 802 …1942; CM-IN-0629, Chung- king to AGWAR, # # z , 3 Apr. 1942; memo for Gen. Arnold…
  • p. 805 …Ltr., Arnold to King, 2 5 Feb. 1942. certain evidence from all Allied and enemy sources…
  • p. 806 …Memo for King from McNarney, 26 May 1942. 7 1 . Ltr., King to Marshall, 10 June…
  • p. 807 …Ltr., Marshall to King, 14 Sept. 1942, TAB XIVA, in Bowles report; memo for C G…
  • p. 808 …to notes from Mar- shall and Adm. King). 3 2 . A I c m o for…
  • p. 814 …Forces to the United King- dom, App. A, 19 Aug. 1942. 50. Ltr., Col. H.L…
  • p. 851 …C.E., 48-50 Killin, Pfc, 219 Kilner Board, 1 2 0 Kimbolton, 63 I King…
  • p. 854 …in Chief, 515, 5 2 2 , 544. (see also King); controversy over air power vs. battleship…
T H E A R M Y A I R F O R C E S I N W O R L D W A R I 1
ing force to General Eaker and his staff during their study of the RAF
Bomber Command in February and Tables of organization
for AAF tactical groups were weak in combat intelligence categories,
and since the AAF intelligence school at Harrisburg, Pennsylvania,
did not open until March 1942, it proved impossible to fill even the
limited number of jobs authorized. General Eaker in his report of
2 0 March observed that “Intelligence represents the section of activity
in which we are weakest,” and concluded “after studying their [Brit-
ish] intelligence work that we can do no better initially than to model
their establishment with but slight change.” 5 5 Accordingly, Wash-
ington was requested to send immediately 50 intelligence officers for
training by the RAF Bomber Command, and in May the first of
these arri~ed.~’In an intelligence school established at High Wycombe
they received a week of orientation before being sent on to the
British The VIII Bomber Command requested an additional
165 intelligence officers in July under a plan to reach the total of 198
by I September. 5 8 General Eaker and Lt. Harris B. Hull, his intelli-
gence officer, had recommended in March 6 intelligence officers for
each squadron, 7 for each group headquarters, 7 at wing head-
quarters, and 32 for bomber command headquarters-these to assume
the normal responsibility for preparation of target data, photo inter-
pretation, prisoner of war interrogation, enemy order of battle, the
maintenance of intelligence libraries, preparation of summaries and
reports, and, in addition, for public relations.59New tables of organ-
ization for the various echelons of the AAF published during 1942
did not provide for intelligence officers in these numbers, but they
did reflect an attempt to provide more adequately than theretofore
for the intelligence function.“
Reliance on the RAF and other British agencies for intelligence
would characterize the American air effort in Europe throughout
the war, and this was especially true of intelligence in its more funda-
mental aspects. Possessed of long-established and well-organized in-
telligence services, the British initially supplied the Eighth with most
of the information from which it prepared its target data. The Ameri-
cans developed in time increasingly helpful services of their own, but
it was decided wisely a t the outset to avoid unnecessary duplication
of effort by placing American personnel in already existing British
organizations. It was agreed, for instance, that the RAF would t r p
American officers in photo interpretation for assignment to its own
624

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.