Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 303 …of Naval Opera- tions; Adm. Ernest J. King, Commander in Chief, U.S. Fleet; Gen. George…
  • p. 316 …So far as the Navy is concerned, Admiral King, as you know, is not only Chief…
  • p. 493 …Admiral King believed that the mines offered a tempting bait to the Japanese who were currently…
  • p. 526 …Hence Admiral King placed a bid for suffi- 461
  • p. 527 …t this stage of the war Admiral King had accepted the belief that his carrier planes…
  • p. 538 …plan by 2 9 June, when Admiral King submitted to the Joint Chiefs a proposal that…
  • p. 607 …type * O n 5 March 1942, Admiral King wrote to General Arnold as follows: “The experience…
  • p. 608 …s.’l A formal request by Admiral King to the Chief of the Army Air Forces…
  • p. 609 …In a letter of 9 March 1942 to Admiral King, he proposed “the estab- lishment of…
  • p. 614 …In June, Admiral King expressed the official Navy position on this point with the utmost clarity…
  • p. 615 …In a memorandum to Admiral King, General McNarney, Deputy Chief of Staff, on 26 May outlined…
  • p. 616 …viewed as a temporary deta~hment.?~ Admiral King’s reaction to these cautious proposals was expressed…
  • p. 618 …the same words as used by Admiral King a month earlier: the answer to the antisubmarine…
  • p. 621 …On 14 September, General Marshall wrote to Admiral King: “Experience with the First Bomber Command in…
  • p. 622 …T o General Marshall’s proposal of 14 September, Admiral King had replied that, although he…
  • p. 641 …54 A week later General Marshall, Admiral King, Harry Hopkins, and a small staff flew to…
  • p. 645 …that scheduled to operate from the United King- dom. Dry topic or no, organization must figure…
  • p. 684 …the principal air task in the United King- dom had long been conceived as strategic bombardment…
  • p. 707 …establishment of base depots in the United King- dom became the basis of action in January…
  • p. 724 …Implicit in all of the arrangements being made in the United King- dom was the belief…
  • p. 788 …Force, Pt. I ; Fleet Adm. Ernest J. King, First Official Report to the Secretary of the…
  • p. 793 …Memo for Adm, King from C/S, 17 Mar. 1 % ~ . 34. JPS 2I/j/D, 7…
  • p. 795 …4 Aug. 1942. 108. Zbid. 109. Adm. King’s Report on Battle of Midway, incl. in…
  • p. 797 …306, 29 June 1942; memos for Adm. King from Mar- shall, 26 June 1942, and for…
  • p. 802 …1942; CM-IN-0629, Chung- king to AGWAR, # # z , 3 Apr. 1942; memo for Gen. Arnold…
  • p. 805 …Ltr., Arnold to King, 2 5 Feb. 1942. certain evidence from all Allied and enemy sources…
  • p. 806 …Memo for King from McNarney, 26 May 1942. 7 1 . Ltr., King to Marshall, 10 June…
  • p. 807 …Ltr., Marshall to King, 14 Sept. 1942, TAB XIVA, in Bowles report; memo for C G…
  • p. 808 …to notes from Mar- shall and Adm. King). 3 2 . A I c m o for…
  • p. 814 …Forces to the United King- dom, App. A, 19 Aug. 1942. 50. Ltr., Col. H.L…
  • p. 851 …C.E., 48-50 Killin, Pfc, 219 Kilner Board, 1 2 0 Kimbolton, 63 I King…
  • p. 854 …in Chief, 515, 5 2 2 , 544. (see also King); controversy over air power vs. battleship…
T H E A R M Y A I R F O R C E S I N W O R L D W A R I 1
date of embarkation or until the beginning of training with the Mobile
Reserve Corps. It was attached for administration and supply to
the Third Air Force,Dwhich continued to act as a parent to most
of the units of the infant Eighth until their departure for the United
Kingdom several months later.
By 12 February it had become apparent to Colonel Duncan that
the 24,125 men and 621 aircraft planned for the Eighth would not
be adequate to carry out the mission intended for it under GYM-
NAST. H e recommended, therefore, that his force be augmented by
the addition of three heavy bombardment groups, one medium bom-
bardment group, and three pursuit groups.1o But such an augmenta-
tion of strength would have required the diversion of combat units
intended for other task forces. The Air War Plans Division (AWPD),
therefore, on 25 February recommended instead the elimination of
GYMNAST from current projects.” The project had been period-
ically deferred during February, largely because of the demands
made by our hard pressed forces in the Pacific, and early in March
the Combined Chiefs took under consideration a recommendation
that SUPER-GYMNAST be continued as an “academic study’’
only.12 Until it was revived some months later under the name of
TORCH, the North African venture ceased to affect the fortunes
of the Eighth Air Force.
As though to indicate the trend of policy, the Eighth already had
sustained a practical reduction in strength. O n 19 February it had
been instructed to make available to Lt. Col. James H. Doolittle
twenty B-25’S with combat crews from its 17th Bombardment Group
for the special mission to be led by him against Tokyo.” During
March, intensive training of VIII Bomber Command units was in-
terrupted further by the imperative demands of the antisubmarine
campaign in the Atlantic; and while planes and crews of the 17th
Group participated in the defense of the southeast coast of the United
States, an additional sixty-seven pilots of the VIII Bomber Command
were on special duty outside the continental limits of the United
state^.'^ Finally, a t the end of March all combat groups then as-
signed to the Eighth Air Force passed from its control to that of
the Third Air Force in an administrative shift preparatory to the
assignment of a new mission and of new units for its f~1filment.l~
Abandonment of GYMNAST had left the Eighth Air Force un-
committed to any operation. Maj. Gen. Carl Spaatz, commanding
614

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.