Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 258 …order to achieve this end we should cooperate with Japan fully un- quote.” Then: “ I 3…
  • p. 345 …seater aircraft operated by inexperienced personnel in cooperation with antiaircraft search- lights.” la‘ Many important objectives…
  • p. 425 …with brilliant judgment who must rely on cooperation,” * the ARCADIA conference of the British and American…
  • p. 566 …joined at Dinjan by Col. Merian C. Cooper. The task confronting them, to say the le…
  • p. 596 …There had even been talk of “mutual cooperation” rather than “unity of command.” Some firm decision…
  • p. 629 …the British Isles, to “operate independently in cooperation with the British Bomber Command.” l o Detailed…
  • p. 679 …the fullest agreement with the methods of cooperation which you propose and supremely confident that, at…
  • p. 793 …1942. 36. Ibid. 37. Col. Merian C. Cooper, Briefing 7'8 Officer, First Special Aviation Project…
  • p. 802 …Mar. 1943; talk by Col. M.C. Cooper in Gen. Johnson's Staff Meeting, 2 3…
  • p. 846 …5 5 2 Coolidge, President, 25, 28 Cooper, Col. M.C., 499 Coral Sea. Battle of…
P L A N S , P O L I C I E S , A N D O R G A N I Z A T I O N
Eaker’s report gave then an affirmative, if cautious, reply to Spaatz’
question as to the feasibility of daylight operations. The report was
favorably received in Wa~hington,”~and when Spaatz arrived in
England in mid-June he was still inclined to accept its verdict. It is
true that the adoption of BOLERO had involved a sharp reorientation
in air strategy: the long-term bombardment campaign had become less
important than counterair activities and close support. Thus, the
mission assigned to the Eighth Air Force by General Eisenhower
on 2 1 July was, in collaboration with the RAF, “to initiate imme-
diately the maximum degree of air operations with a view to obtaining
and maintaining domination of the air over Western France by
I April 1943 and be prepared to furnish the maximum support to
the forward movement of U.S. Army ground forces by late summer
1942.”2 2 4 Yet while Spaatz and his staff were preparing to execute
that mission, the heavy bomber program as originally conceived was
not entirely abandoned, and the change from BOLERO to T O R C H
released the Eighth Air Force from any immediate concern with close
support for a cross-Channel push. Thus, on I August, Eaker could
describe the mission of the VIII Bomber Command in terms wholly
consistent with those of his 2 0 March report: the destruction of
carefully chosen strategic targets. The experimental nature of the
task was still evident in the directive he issued: “A subsidiary purpose
of our early bombing operations will be to determine our capacity to
destroy pinpoint targets by daylight accuracy bombing and our ability
to beat off fighter opposition and to evade antiaircraft opposition.” 2 2 5
Because of diversions of bomber units to TORCH and the Pacific,
the “subsidiary purpose” was to be the main purpose for almost a year.
Eaker’s statement implied that the tests would involve penetration
by unescorted bombers, and indeed until fighter range could be
stepped up appreciably any missions into Germany proper must be
flown by the heavies alone. But there was no intention of throwing
the first handful of B-17’s in a daylight stab at Berlin: initial efforts
should be exerted tentatively within fighter radius of southeast Eng-
land. Throughout negotiations with the British, Arnold, Spaatz, and
Eaker had resisted all attempts to integrate U.S. pursuit units with
RAF groups charged with defense of England; AAF fighters should
be a part of the striking force with the primary duty of escorting
bombers.226But in August it was obvious that for want of fighter
strength RAF Fighter Command would have to furnish most of the
607

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.