Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 303 …of Naval Opera- tions; Adm. Ernest J. King, Commander in Chief, U.S. Fleet; Gen. George…
  • p. 316 …So far as the Navy is concerned, Admiral King, as you know, is not only Chief…
  • p. 493 …Admiral King believed that the mines offered a tempting bait to the Japanese who were currently…
  • p. 526 …Hence Admiral King placed a bid for suffi- 461
  • p. 527 …t this stage of the war Admiral King had accepted the belief that his carrier planes…
  • p. 538 …plan by 2 9 June, when Admiral King submitted to the Joint Chiefs a proposal that…
  • p. 607 …type * O n 5 March 1942, Admiral King wrote to General Arnold as follows: “The experience…
  • p. 608 …s.’l A formal request by Admiral King to the Chief of the Army Air Forces…
  • p. 609 …In a letter of 9 March 1942 to Admiral King, he proposed “the estab- lishment of…
  • p. 614 …In June, Admiral King expressed the official Navy position on this point with the utmost clarity…
  • p. 615 …In a memorandum to Admiral King, General McNarney, Deputy Chief of Staff, on 26 May outlined…
  • p. 616 …viewed as a temporary deta~hment.?~ Admiral King’s reaction to these cautious proposals was expressed…
  • p. 618 …the same words as used by Admiral King a month earlier: the answer to the antisubmarine…
  • p. 621 …On 14 September, General Marshall wrote to Admiral King: “Experience with the First Bomber Command in…
  • p. 622 …T o General Marshall’s proposal of 14 September, Admiral King had replied that, although he…
  • p. 641 …54 A week later General Marshall, Admiral King, Harry Hopkins, and a small staff flew to…
  • p. 645 …that scheduled to operate from the United King- dom. Dry topic or no, organization must figure…
  • p. 684 …the principal air task in the United King- dom had long been conceived as strategic bombardment…
  • p. 707 …establishment of base depots in the United King- dom became the basis of action in January…
  • p. 724 …Implicit in all of the arrangements being made in the United King- dom was the belief…
  • p. 788 …Force, Pt. I ; Fleet Adm. Ernest J. King, First Official Report to the Secretary of the…
  • p. 793 …Memo for Adm, King from C/S, 17 Mar. 1 % ~ . 34. JPS 2I/j/D, 7…
  • p. 795 …4 Aug. 1942. 108. Zbid. 109. Adm. King’s Report on Battle of Midway, incl. in…
  • p. 797 …306, 29 June 1942; memos for Adm. King from Mar- shall, 26 June 1942, and for…
  • p. 802 …1942; CM-IN-0629, Chung- king to AGWAR, # # z , 3 Apr. 1942; memo for Gen. Arnold…
  • p. 805 …Ltr., Arnold to King, 2 5 Feb. 1942. certain evidence from all Allied and enemy sources…
  • p. 806 …Memo for King from McNarney, 26 May 1942. 7 1 . Ltr., King to Marshall, 10 June…
  • p. 807 …Ltr., Marshall to King, 14 Sept. 1942, TAB XIVA, in Bowles report; memo for C G…
  • p. 808 …to notes from Mar- shall and Adm. King). 3 2 . A I c m o for…
  • p. 814 …Forces to the United King- dom, App. A, 19 Aug. 1942. 50. Ltr., Col. H.L…
  • p. 851 …C.E., 48-50 Killin, Pfc, 219 Kilner Board, 1 2 0 Kimbolton, 63 I King…
  • p. 854 …in Chief, 515, 5 2 2 , 544. (see also King); controversy over air power vs. battleship…
T H E A R M Y A I R F O R C E S I N W O R L D W A R I 1
mission, Bomber Command’s efforts had been diffused in attacks on
nonstrategic targets so that it had been impossible to accept the
heavier losses which daylight operations would involve. Economy in
materials and in production man-hours favored the night bomber;
easier maintenance, smaller crews, and, above all, smaller losses, fa-
vored night operations. Just as the British had earlier admitted that
they might eventually turn to day bombing, so Eaker was willing,
if necessary, to give British methods a trial. AWPD/I had assumed
that toward the end of the bomber campaign the AAF might turn
to area bombing of cities to give the coup de grdce to German morale,
but Eaker was interested in the more immediate future. So soon as a
satisfactory flame dampener could be developed for his heavy bombers
and crews could be specially trained, he proposed to use his force
“both day and night.”
This was in keeping with the experimental tone which pervaded
the whole report. Eaker was keenly aware of the great fund of ex-
perience which the RAF had built up in two and a half years of war,
and he hoped to profit both from their successes and from their
errors. But he was still convinced that the AAF’s chief contribution
would be through operations of the type for which its equipment
and training had been designed. Daylight bombing would make
navigation and location of targets easier. Operational, as opposed to
combat, losses would be fewer. But, above all, it was only by follow-
ing approved AAF practice that bombardment could approach
precision standards. This would require, in addition to skillful
bombardiers, intensive training in evasive action, formation flying, and
gunnery. It would require, too, an adequate force, regular replace-
ments, and high morale. In the initial stages operations should be of
shallow penetration only so that some protection might be had from
fighter escorts with limited range, and targets and methods of attack
should be varied constantly to confuse the defense. This applied to
the Anglo-American combined effort as well, and Eaker stressed
the positive value of a co-ordinated day-night attack on Germany.
Such a program would abate congestion in British skies, already over-
crowded with planes. It would allow the AAF and RAF to specialize
on the type of targets and tactics for which each was best qualified.
And by keeping German defenses on the alert around the clock,
the combined attack in the long run would reduce both American
and British losses.
606

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.