Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 303 …of Naval Opera- tions; Adm. Ernest J. King, Commander in Chief, U.S. Fleet; Gen. George…
  • p. 316 …So far as the Navy is concerned, Admiral King, as you know, is not only Chief…
  • p. 493 …Admiral King believed that the mines offered a tempting bait to the Japanese who were currently…
  • p. 526 …Hence Admiral King placed a bid for suffi- 461
  • p. 527 …t this stage of the war Admiral King had accepted the belief that his carrier planes…
  • p. 538 …plan by 2 9 June, when Admiral King submitted to the Joint Chiefs a proposal that…
  • p. 607 …type * O n 5 March 1942, Admiral King wrote to General Arnold as follows: “The experience…
  • p. 608 …s.’l A formal request by Admiral King to the Chief of the Army Air Forces…
  • p. 609 …In a letter of 9 March 1942 to Admiral King, he proposed “the estab- lishment of…
  • p. 614 …In June, Admiral King expressed the official Navy position on this point with the utmost clarity…
  • p. 615 …In a memorandum to Admiral King, General McNarney, Deputy Chief of Staff, on 26 May outlined…
  • p. 616 …viewed as a temporary deta~hment.?~ Admiral King’s reaction to these cautious proposals was expressed…
  • p. 618 …the same words as used by Admiral King a month earlier: the answer to the antisubmarine…
  • p. 621 …On 14 September, General Marshall wrote to Admiral King: “Experience with the First Bomber Command in…
  • p. 622 …T o General Marshall’s proposal of 14 September, Admiral King had replied that, although he…
  • p. 641 …54 A week later General Marshall, Admiral King, Harry Hopkins, and a small staff flew to…
  • p. 645 …that scheduled to operate from the United King- dom. Dry topic or no, organization must figure…
  • p. 684 …the principal air task in the United King- dom had long been conceived as strategic bombardment…
  • p. 707 …establishment of base depots in the United King- dom became the basis of action in January…
  • p. 724 …Implicit in all of the arrangements being made in the United King- dom was the belief…
  • p. 788 …Force, Pt. I ; Fleet Adm. Ernest J. King, First Official Report to the Secretary of the…
  • p. 793 …Memo for Adm, King from C/S, 17 Mar. 1 % ~ . 34. JPS 2I/j/D, 7…
  • p. 795 …4 Aug. 1942. 108. Zbid. 109. Adm. King’s Report on Battle of Midway, incl. in…
  • p. 797 …306, 29 June 1942; memos for Adm. King from Mar- shall, 26 June 1942, and for…
  • p. 802 …1942; CM-IN-0629, Chung- king to AGWAR, # # z , 3 Apr. 1942; memo for Gen. Arnold…
  • p. 805 …Ltr., Arnold to King, 2 5 Feb. 1942. certain evidence from all Allied and enemy sources…
  • p. 806 …Memo for King from McNarney, 26 May 1942. 7 1 . Ltr., King to Marshall, 10 June…
  • p. 807 …Ltr., Marshall to King, 14 Sept. 1942, TAB XIVA, in Bowles report; memo for C G…
  • p. 808 …to notes from Mar- shall and Adm. King). 3 2 . A I c m o for…
  • p. 814 …Forces to the United King- dom, App. A, 19 Aug. 1942. 50. Ltr., Col. H.L…
  • p. 851 …C.E., 48-50 Killin, Pfc, 219 Kilner Board, 1 2 0 Kimbolton, 63 I King…
  • p. 854 …in Chief, 515, 5 2 2 , 544. (see also King); controversy over air power vs. battleship…
P L A N S , P O L I C I E S , A N D O R G A N I Z A T I O N
I would like to have you see Eisenhower and get him to accept your
headquarters as his air planning unit. Get him to use you in that way
as he is the head of all US Army Forces in Europe. I want him to
recognize you as the top airman in all Europe.” 14‘ This request was
passed on to Eisenhower in a more formal communication, and on
2 1 August Spaatz was given additional duties as Air Officer for
ETOUSA and head of the air section of its The actual repre-
sentation a t ETOUSA headquarters was to be through a deputy and
assistants, but this measure assured to the Eighth Air Force an active
participation in theater planning as earlier arrangements had for plan-
ning for the bomber offensive with the RAF.
Daylight or Dark?
As an argument in favor of his organizational scheme for the
USAFBI air force, General Arnold in February 1942 reminded Gen-
eral Chaney that U.S. bombardment operations must be guided by
American doctrines and principles, which were “entirely different”
from those of the British.”” In July, Air Marshal Sir Arthur Harris
wrote to General Eaker: “I myself, and all the members of my com-
mand who have been in official or unofficial relations with you and
yours, by now well appreciate that common doctrines prevail.” 1 5 0
During the five intervening months, neither air force had changed its
ideas materially, though by the latter date there was more mutual
understanding. The apparent contradiction in the two messages may
be explained only by the fact that Harris referred to a general con-
cept of air warfare, Arnold to the tactics by which that concept could
be realized. That pattern-of agreement as to ends, dissent as to
means-was so important a factor in the early operations of the Eighth
Air Force that some explanation should be given here of the rival
doctrines. Such an analysis will indicate that essentially Harris was
right: that the area of agreement far outweighed in importance the
doctrinal variations. Indeed, in respect to the role of air power in the
war, opinions tended often to follow service rather than national lines
of cleavage.
That fact should not be clouded by the apparent unanimity of
opinion in the earliest Anglo-American war plans. The prominence
given to strategic bombardment in ABC-I reflected the current weak-
ness of British and American forces. In March 1941 it was realized
that Germany would long remain too strong to be attacked frontally;
591

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.