Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 303 …of Naval Opera- tions; Adm. Ernest J. King, Commander in Chief, U.S. Fleet; Gen. George…
  • p. 316 …So far as the Navy is concerned, Admiral King, as you know, is not only Chief…
  • p. 493 …Admiral King believed that the mines offered a tempting bait to the Japanese who were currently…
  • p. 526 …Hence Admiral King placed a bid for suffi- 461
  • p. 527 …t this stage of the war Admiral King had accepted the belief that his carrier planes…
  • p. 538 …plan by 2 9 June, when Admiral King submitted to the Joint Chiefs a proposal that…
  • p. 607 …type * O n 5 March 1942, Admiral King wrote to General Arnold as follows: “The experience…
  • p. 608 …s.’l A formal request by Admiral King to the Chief of the Army Air Forces…
  • p. 609 …In a letter of 9 March 1942 to Admiral King, he proposed “the estab- lishment of…
  • p. 614 …In June, Admiral King expressed the official Navy position on this point with the utmost clarity…
  • p. 615 …In a memorandum to Admiral King, General McNarney, Deputy Chief of Staff, on 26 May outlined…
  • p. 616 …viewed as a temporary deta~hment.?~ Admiral King’s reaction to these cautious proposals was expressed…
  • p. 618 …the same words as used by Admiral King a month earlier: the answer to the antisubmarine…
  • p. 621 …On 14 September, General Marshall wrote to Admiral King: “Experience with the First Bomber Command in…
  • p. 622 …T o General Marshall’s proposal of 14 September, Admiral King had replied that, although he…
  • p. 641 …54 A week later General Marshall, Admiral King, Harry Hopkins, and a small staff flew to…
  • p. 645 …that scheduled to operate from the United King- dom. Dry topic or no, organization must figure…
  • p. 684 …the principal air task in the United King- dom had long been conceived as strategic bombardment…
  • p. 707 …establishment of base depots in the United King- dom became the basis of action in January…
  • p. 724 …Implicit in all of the arrangements being made in the United King- dom was the belief…
  • p. 788 …Force, Pt. I ; Fleet Adm. Ernest J. King, First Official Report to the Secretary of the…
  • p. 793 …Memo for Adm, King from C/S, 17 Mar. 1 % ~ . 34. JPS 2I/j/D, 7…
  • p. 795 …4 Aug. 1942. 108. Zbid. 109. Adm. King’s Report on Battle of Midway, incl. in…
  • p. 797 …306, 29 June 1942; memos for Adm. King from Mar- shall, 26 June 1942, and for…
  • p. 802 …1942; CM-IN-0629, Chung- king to AGWAR, # # z , 3 Apr. 1942; memo for Gen. Arnold…
  • p. 805 …Ltr., Arnold to King, 2 5 Feb. 1942. certain evidence from all Allied and enemy sources…
  • p. 806 …Memo for King from McNarney, 26 May 1942. 7 1 . Ltr., King to Marshall, 10 June…
  • p. 807 …Ltr., Marshall to King, 14 Sept. 1942, TAB XIVA, in Bowles report; memo for C G…
  • p. 808 …to notes from Mar- shall and Adm. King). 3 2 . A I c m o for…
  • p. 814 …Forces to the United King- dom, App. A, 19 Aug. 1942. 50. Ltr., Col. H.L…
  • p. 851 …C.E., 48-50 Killin, Pfc, 219 Kilner Board, 1 2 0 Kimbolton, 63 I King…
  • p. 854 …in Chief, 515, 5 2 2 , 544. (see also King); controversy over air power vs. battleship…
T H E A R M Y A I R F O R C E S I N W O R L D W A R I 1
CCS and the governments they represented, but initial planning was
carried on independently by several staffs. The views of the Eighth
Air Force were incorporated in a paper which Spaatz submitted to
Arnold, requesting that he recommend it to the Joint Chiefs of
Staff Spaatz’ plan adapted to the European theater certain features
of the new War Department structure, others from the Combined
Chiefs of Staff organization. It placed the Army air component in the
United Kingdom on a level with that of the British (i.e., Eighth Air
Force = RAF; VIII Bomber Command = RAF Bomber Command) ;
and while it provided for integral national forces each with its own
conventional chain of command, Spaatz proposed that in matters per-
taining exclusively to aviation, air commanders be allowed to settle
problems directly and “on the spot” with their British opposite
members.
Arnold approved this scheme in principle, and on the eve of his
departure for the London conference of 26 May, suggested that it be
co-ordinated with OPD * before it was sent up to the JCS.13s OPD
objected to a number of provisions, including the last named, and on
4 June submitted its own counterproposal^.^^^ Before these divergent
views came to the attention of the Joint Chiefs, the latter had received
from the British Chiefs of Staff Committee a memorandum on the
over-all command for the ROUNDUP/SLEDGEHAMMER opera-
tions, with several alternative suggestions for control arrangement^.'^^
The Joint Chiefs found no one of these satisfactory, and they felt that
the British had wrongly subordinated the main problem-combined
machinery for control of the theater-to that of command for what
was, after all, only a task force of unusual size. They felt also that
the as yet unnamed supreme commander should have some voice in
determining his own organi~ation.’~~So it was that final decision was
repeatedly postponed through June and July while the Combined
Chiefs debated the relative merits of ROUNDUP and TORCH.13g
The choice of T O R C H did result in the appointment of General
Eisenhower as Allied commander as well as theater commander, but
it was to be weeks before the air organization for T O R C H was per-
fected. That involved the creation of a new air force, the Twelfth,
and the story of its formation may be told more appropriately in
* On 23 March 1942, War Plans Division (WPD) of the War Department General
Staff had been redesignated Operations Division (OPD).
588

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.