Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 2 THE UNIVERSITYOF CHICAGOPRESS, CHICAGO8 LONDON The University of Toronto Press, Toronto 5, Canada Copyright 1948 by…
  • p. 48 …An Associated Press dispatch of 10 October gave a contemporary judgment of the importance of this…
  • p. 55 …Air Service (Corps) found it difficult to press vigorously for reorgani- zation and, by default, leadership…
  • p. 56 …In 1919the W a r Department was pressing for a drastic revision of the military establishment…
  • p. 61 …It held that there was no danger of an air attack on the United States and…
  • p. 64 …GHQ Air Forcq a trial than to press for more radical measures, and Howell’s group…
  • p. 75 …Powerful air attacks resolutely pressed home could never be completely stopped, but their effects could best…
  • p. 98 …based air operations in defense of the United States and its overseas posses~ions.’~T w…
  • p. 99 …General Westover’s report concluded that “all Air Force units could be concentrated on either coast…
  • p. 130 …the Admiralty began to press for control of naval air units, while the army attempted to…
  • p. 149 …basic and advanced Responsibility for crew and unit train- ing was vested in the GHQ Air…
  • p. 164 …A m y air units in the Territory existed primarily for the defense of this and…
  • p. 176 …no military alliances were made which would commit the United States to war; the plans only…
  • p. 278 …There were also grounds for hoping that heavy bomber units now based on Darwin might increase…
  • p. 285 …From 1938 the United States had invoked sanctions against Japan in the form of moral em…
  • p. 287 …Over-all Strategy and lmmediate Deployment On 2 2 December, the press announced dramatically the arrival…
  • p. 289 …ground units sent in that direction were not destined for immediate combat. No major invasion of…
  • p. 323 …Seizure of bases in Canada or Mexico for later attacks on the United States. Capture of…
  • p. 366 …United state^,^ and the British them- selves were forced to withdraw some pilots from combat units…
  • p. 380 …Upon the request of the Ferrying Command, the State Depart- ment again pressed for an answer…
  • p. 397 …the summer and fall, first as the United States Middle East Air Force and later as…
  • p. 430 …Attempts had been made to replace these obsolete craft by purchase from the United States, but…
  • p. 440 …But as the Japanese pressed forward the Americans were given no opportunity to get set. The…
  • p. 463 …personnel that would be reassigned to infantry units whose rosters already included many representatives of the…
  • p. 552 …pines and more recently of American air units operating in the Netherlands East Indies, he was…
  • p. 560 …Moreover, examination proved that most of the basic equipment of the units, including badly needed trucks…
  • p. 563 …Grady arrived from the United States for a comprehensive survey of Indian resources with reference to…
  • p. 564 …TO C H I N A graphic units, and unfavorable atmospheric conditions combined to make high…
  • p. 607 …Thus the AAF units engaged in the anti-U-boat war became almost a t once…
  • p. 628 …Army air bombardment units would operate offensively in collaboration with the Royal Air Force, primarily against…
  • p. 658 …was to operate in the United Kingdom.14' All air units initially based there were to…
  • p. 683 …of the units of the infant Eighth until their departure for the United Kingdom several months…
  • p. 691 …The RAF proposed that American fighter units be integrated with its own under a plan eventually…
  • p. 748 …533.) By 1928he was (Patrick, United States in the Air, pp. 190-91.) 38. Charges of…
  • p. 770 …y.W D Press Release, 2 1 June 1941. 9 1 . AR 95-5, 3a. 92…
  • p. 857 …Presque Isle, 344, 347-49, 641, 644-45 Press comment: B-17, 662-63; danger of…
T H E A R M Y A I R F O R C E S I N W O R L D W A R I 1
to Marshall and Arnold, Chaney said flatly that he did not desire to
change views expressed in his previous messages since consideration
had been given to all points of the proposed organization.ll’
Blocked by this impasse in London, Arnold turned to higher au-
thority. On 2 6 February he had written the Chief of Staff asking that
Chaney be directed to organize USAFBI with correlative air, ground,
and service force commanders responsible directly to the theater com-
mander.lZ0 This memo was reviewed by W P D and, on 4 March,
General Eisenhower, chief of that office, expressed his disapproval.
The General Staff was then busy with its plans for a second front,
and W P D was unwilling to risk the loss of British co-operation
through an effort to impose on their existing organization a “US
system of totally different type.” Elence Arnold was informed that
“General Chaney’s telegram of January 30, on this subject, must be
accepted, for the present, as conclusive.” lZ1 There was, however,
this saving clause: the present decision would not preclude a later
revision of Chaney’s directive. Arnold could only point out the
obvious fact that his organization, far from being “totally different,”
was remarkably similar to that of the British,”’ and bide his time.
So on 5 March he could not write “much of an official nature’’ to
Eaker since affairs were “in too unsettled a state”; but he could sug-
gest quietly that Eaker go on with his organizational planning on the
assumption that things “will iron themselves out so that we will be
entirely satisfied.’’ lZ3
During March, while the War Department’s invasion plans were
shaping up, no change was made in Chaney’s directive, but RAIN-
BOW No. 5, which had been the basis of his plans, was rapidly
crumbling away. On 19 March, Marshall wrote Chaney that he should
provide for the reception of air and ground forces on a scale far
beyond that previously scheduled. The “token force” had been
scratched,lZ4and within a week the Navy had abandoned its design
for a base in Scotland, thus relieving USAFBI of the responsibility
for air defense there.lZ5The low priority given to air units for MAG-
NET similarly modified plans for Northern Ireland.” In the face of
these changes, Chaney’s scheme to build his organization around ter-
ritorial task forces had become obsolete.
O n 3 0 March, Marshall informed Chaney that his command ar-
rangements should be suitable for the employment of large forces,
* See above, p. 240.
586

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.