Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 303 …of Naval Opera- tions; Adm. Ernest J. King, Commander in Chief, U.S. Fleet; Gen. George…
  • p. 316 …So far as the Navy is concerned, Admiral King, as you know, is not only Chief…
  • p. 493 …Admiral King believed that the mines offered a tempting bait to the Japanese who were currently…
  • p. 526 …Hence Admiral King placed a bid for suffi- 461
  • p. 527 …t this stage of the war Admiral King had accepted the belief that his carrier planes…
  • p. 538 …plan by 2 9 June, when Admiral King submitted to the Joint Chiefs a proposal that…
  • p. 607 …type * O n 5 March 1942, Admiral King wrote to General Arnold as follows: “The experience…
  • p. 608 …s.’l A formal request by Admiral King to the Chief of the Army Air Forces…
  • p. 609 …In a letter of 9 March 1942 to Admiral King, he proposed “the estab- lishment of…
  • p. 614 …In June, Admiral King expressed the official Navy position on this point with the utmost clarity…
  • p. 615 …In a memorandum to Admiral King, General McNarney, Deputy Chief of Staff, on 26 May outlined…
  • p. 616 …viewed as a temporary deta~hment.?~ Admiral King’s reaction to these cautious proposals was expressed…
  • p. 618 …the same words as used by Admiral King a month earlier: the answer to the antisubmarine…
  • p. 621 …On 14 September, General Marshall wrote to Admiral King: “Experience with the First Bomber Command in…
  • p. 622 …T o General Marshall’s proposal of 14 September, Admiral King had replied that, although he…
  • p. 641 …54 A week later General Marshall, Admiral King, Harry Hopkins, and a small staff flew to…
  • p. 645 …that scheduled to operate from the United King- dom. Dry topic or no, organization must figure…
  • p. 684 …the principal air task in the United King- dom had long been conceived as strategic bombardment…
  • p. 707 …establishment of base depots in the United King- dom became the basis of action in January…
  • p. 724 …Implicit in all of the arrangements being made in the United King- dom was the belief…
  • p. 788 …Force, Pt. I ; Fleet Adm. Ernest J. King, First Official Report to the Secretary of the…
  • p. 793 …Memo for Adm, King from C/S, 17 Mar. 1 % ~ . 34. JPS 2I/j/D, 7…
  • p. 795 …4 Aug. 1942. 108. Zbid. 109. Adm. King’s Report on Battle of Midway, incl. in…
  • p. 797 …306, 29 June 1942; memos for Adm. King from Mar- shall, 26 June 1942, and for…
  • p. 802 …1942; CM-IN-0629, Chung- king to AGWAR, # # z , 3 Apr. 1942; memo for Gen. Arnold…
  • p. 805 …Ltr., Arnold to King, 2 5 Feb. 1942. certain evidence from all Allied and enemy sources…
  • p. 806 …Memo for King from McNarney, 26 May 1942. 7 1 . Ltr., King to Marshall, 10 June…
  • p. 807 …Ltr., Marshall to King, 14 Sept. 1942, TAB XIVA, in Bowles report; memo for C G…
  • p. 808 …to notes from Mar- shall and Adm. King). 3 2 . A I c m o for…
  • p. 814 …Forces to the United King- dom, App. A, 19 Aug. 1942. 50. Ltr., Col. H.L…
  • p. 851 …C.E., 48-50 Killin, Pfc, 219 Kilner Board, 1 2 0 Kimbolton, 63 I King…
  • p. 854 …in Chief, 515, 5 2 2 , 544. (see also King); controversy over air power vs. battleship…
T H E A R M Y A I R F O R C E S I N W O R L D W A R I 1
to Marshall and Arnold, Chaney said flatly that he did not desire to
change views expressed in his previous messages since consideration
had been given to all points of the proposed organization.ll’
Blocked by this impasse in London, Arnold turned to higher au-
thority. On 2 6 February he had written the Chief of Staff asking that
Chaney be directed to organize USAFBI with correlative air, ground,
and service force commanders responsible directly to the theater com-
mander.lZ0 This memo was reviewed by W P D and, on 4 March,
General Eisenhower, chief of that office, expressed his disapproval.
The General Staff was then busy with its plans for a second front,
and W P D was unwilling to risk the loss of British co-operation
through an effort to impose on their existing organization a “US
system of totally different type.” Elence Arnold was informed that
“General Chaney’s telegram of January 30, on this subject, must be
accepted, for the present, as conclusive.” lZ1 There was, however,
this saving clause: the present decision would not preclude a later
revision of Chaney’s directive. Arnold could only point out the
obvious fact that his organization, far from being “totally different,”
was remarkably similar to that of the British,”’ and bide his time.
So on 5 March he could not write “much of an official nature’’ to
Eaker since affairs were “in too unsettled a state”; but he could sug-
gest quietly that Eaker go on with his organizational planning on the
assumption that things “will iron themselves out so that we will be
entirely satisfied.’’ lZ3
During March, while the War Department’s invasion plans were
shaping up, no change was made in Chaney’s directive, but RAIN-
BOW No. 5, which had been the basis of his plans, was rapidly
crumbling away. On 19 March, Marshall wrote Chaney that he should
provide for the reception of air and ground forces on a scale far
beyond that previously scheduled. The “token force” had been
scratched,lZ4and within a week the Navy had abandoned its design
for a base in Scotland, thus relieving USAFBI of the responsibility
for air defense there.lZ5The low priority given to air units for MAG-
NET similarly modified plans for Northern Ireland.” In the face of
these changes, Chaney’s scheme to build his organization around ter-
ritorial task forces had become obsolete.
O n 3 0 March, Marshall informed Chaney that his command ar-
rangements should be suitable for the employment of large forces,
* See above, p. 240.
586

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.