Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 14 …with the commanding general, who in some instances moved in advance of promptings from Wash- ington…
  • p. 25 …EASTERNAND WESTERNAPPROACHESTO PANAMACANAL ALASKAAND THE ALEUTIANISLANDS PRINCIPALSEAAND AIR ROUTESAS DESIGNATEDBY WASH- ATLANTICFERRYINGAND TRANSPORTROUTESPRIORTO . . . . . . . . . . 297 30' 305…
  • p. 229 …the importance of the Far East Air Force in American strategy, the Air Staff in Wash…
  • p. 292 …Even so, there was in Wash- ington too little intelligence concerning the fluid tactical situation to…
  • p. 302 …The suggestion had been carried out in 1941 with the establishment of the U.S. Special…
  • p. 306 …work permanently with the British Joint Intelligence Committee in Wash- ington. The Combined Military Transportation Committee…
  • p. 389 …to delay the take-off was granted only after an appeal to Wash- ington.’O 3…
  • p. 442 …the time and attention of U.S. officers at Brisbane and of headquarters in Wash- ington…
  • p. 443 …Accidents delayed three planes en route, and one of the P-40’s was completely “washed…
  • p. 454 …promise of weakening the enemy. Attention already had been given in Wash- ington to establishment of…
  • p. 554 …In China, he found the procurement of necessary equipment, even be- fore the outbreak of war…
  • p. 636 …After further negotiations in Wash- ington, the Arnold-Towers-Portal agreement was adopted on z I…
  • p. 693 …Accordingly, Wash- ington was requested to send immediately 50 intelligence officers for training by the RAF…
  • p. 747 …before the Committee on Military Af- fairs, House of Representatives (Wash- 23. See, for instance, William…
  • p. 772 …The exact date of the arrival of air units is not known, as the latter source…
  • p. 799 …The road from Haiphong, Indo- China, to Yunnan was closed by the Vichy government in 1940…
  • p. 814 …Overseas (Ferrying), Air Min- istry, Memorandum on the Movement by Air of US. Forces to the…
T H E A R M Y A I R F O R C E S I N W O R L D W A R I f
era1 of USAFBI and Army member of the U.S. Military Mission in
London-under direct control of the commanding general of U S .
Field Forces in the former capacity, of the War Department in the
latter.g6H e continued also in charge of SPOBS, now vested with en-
larged functions, and direct communications between that office and
AAF Headquarters were a u t h o r i ~ e d . ~ ~In his efforts to secure for
Army air forces in the British Isles the organizational system he pre-
ferred, General Arnold had two avenues of approach. H e could
attempt to convince Chaney, now vested with full authority in
USAFBI, either through the commanding general of U.S. Field
Forces or by direct communication with SPOBS; or as Deputy Chief
of Staff, he could try to influence the War Department, through the
Chief of Staff, to change Chaney’s directive. Neither maneuver was
immediately successful. The confusion in Chaney’s multiple command
was enhanced by the shortage of trained staff officers, a phenomenon
which was then common enough but which confirmed his resistance
toward the multiplication of air headquarters in England.’’ There
was, too, some of the perennial friction between air and ground
officers in his staff. SPOBS had been made up largely of Air Corps
officers 99 and Chaney himself was a command pilot of long standing,
but initial contingents of the U.S. Army bomber command found
some of his “G’s’’ at USAFBI “not very friendly to Air effort.” loo
As for the efforts to have Chaney’s directive modified, time and the
maturing of Anglo-American strategy were to lend point to Arnold’s
arguments.
In January 1942, Arnold submitted to GHQ a chart illustrating the
organization he favored for USAFBI, and on the 21st received ten-
tative approval subject to Chaney’s concurrence.1o1 On the 26th,
Arnold enumerated for Marshall the air units scheduled for the
United Kingdom, both for 1942 and for eventual deployment, re-
questing that the War Department accept his chart as a “general
guide” and activate the air force and constituent commands (bomber,
interceptor, air base) which it called for.lo2The several headquarters
were ordered activated,lo3 but the War Department was not yet
fully committed to Arnold’s plan.
On 24 January, Arnold had informed Chaney of Marshall’s tenta-
tive approval of an air force for USAFBI with Spaatz as commander
and with three subordinate commands, suggesting that the force be
located in the York area.lo4Chaney objected to that site, preferring
5 8 2

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.