Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 303 …of Naval Opera- tions; Adm. Ernest J. King, Commander in Chief, U.S. Fleet; Gen. George…
  • p. 316 …So far as the Navy is concerned, Admiral King, as you know, is not only Chief…
  • p. 493 …Admiral King believed that the mines offered a tempting bait to the Japanese who were currently…
  • p. 526 …Hence Admiral King placed a bid for suffi- 461
  • p. 527 …t this stage of the war Admiral King had accepted the belief that his carrier planes…
  • p. 538 …plan by 2 9 June, when Admiral King submitted to the Joint Chiefs a proposal that…
  • p. 607 …type * O n 5 March 1942, Admiral King wrote to General Arnold as follows: “The experience…
  • p. 608 …s.’l A formal request by Admiral King to the Chief of the Army Air Forces…
  • p. 609 …In a letter of 9 March 1942 to Admiral King, he proposed “the estab- lishment of…
  • p. 614 …In June, Admiral King expressed the official Navy position on this point with the utmost clarity…
  • p. 615 …In a memorandum to Admiral King, General McNarney, Deputy Chief of Staff, on 26 May outlined…
  • p. 616 …viewed as a temporary deta~hment.?~ Admiral King’s reaction to these cautious proposals was expressed…
  • p. 618 …the same words as used by Admiral King a month earlier: the answer to the antisubmarine…
  • p. 621 …On 14 September, General Marshall wrote to Admiral King: “Experience with the First Bomber Command in…
  • p. 622 …T o General Marshall’s proposal of 14 September, Admiral King had replied that, although he…
  • p. 641 …54 A week later General Marshall, Admiral King, Harry Hopkins, and a small staff flew to…
  • p. 645 …that scheduled to operate from the United King- dom. Dry topic or no, organization must figure…
  • p. 684 …the principal air task in the United King- dom had long been conceived as strategic bombardment…
  • p. 707 …establishment of base depots in the United King- dom became the basis of action in January…
  • p. 724 …Implicit in all of the arrangements being made in the United King- dom was the belief…
  • p. 788 …Force, Pt. I ; Fleet Adm. Ernest J. King, First Official Report to the Secretary of the…
  • p. 793 …Memo for Adm, King from C/S, 17 Mar. 1 % ~ . 34. JPS 2I/j/D, 7…
  • p. 795 …4 Aug. 1942. 108. Zbid. 109. Adm. King’s Report on Battle of Midway, incl. in…
  • p. 797 …306, 29 June 1942; memos for Adm. King from Mar- shall, 26 June 1942, and for…
  • p. 802 …1942; CM-IN-0629, Chung- king to AGWAR, # # z , 3 Apr. 1942; memo for Gen. Arnold…
  • p. 805 …Ltr., Arnold to King, 2 5 Feb. 1942. certain evidence from all Allied and enemy sources…
  • p. 806 …Memo for King from McNarney, 26 May 1942. 7 1 . Ltr., King to Marshall, 10 June…
  • p. 807 …Ltr., Marshall to King, 14 Sept. 1942, TAB XIVA, in Bowles report; memo for C G…
  • p. 808 …to notes from Mar- shall and Adm. King). 3 2 . A I c m o for…
  • p. 814 …Forces to the United King- dom, App. A, 19 Aug. 1942. 50. Ltr., Col. H.L…
  • p. 851 …C.E., 48-50 Killin, Pfc, 219 Kilner Board, 1 2 0 Kimbolton, 63 I King…
  • p. 854 …in Chief, 515, 5 2 2 , 544. (see also King); controversy over air power vs. battleship…
T H E A R M Y A I R F O R C E S I N W O R L D W A R I f
era1 of USAFBI and Army member of the U.S. Military Mission in
London-under direct control of the commanding general of U S .
Field Forces in the former capacity, of the War Department in the
latter.g6H e continued also in charge of SPOBS, now vested with en-
larged functions, and direct communications between that office and
AAF Headquarters were a u t h o r i ~ e d . ~ ~In his efforts to secure for
Army air forces in the British Isles the organizational system he pre-
ferred, General Arnold had two avenues of approach. H e could
attempt to convince Chaney, now vested with full authority in
USAFBI, either through the commanding general of U.S. Field
Forces or by direct communication with SPOBS; or as Deputy Chief
of Staff, he could try to influence the War Department, through the
Chief of Staff, to change Chaney’s directive. Neither maneuver was
immediately successful. The confusion in Chaney’s multiple command
was enhanced by the shortage of trained staff officers, a phenomenon
which was then common enough but which confirmed his resistance
toward the multiplication of air headquarters in England.’’ There
was, too, some of the perennial friction between air and ground
officers in his staff. SPOBS had been made up largely of Air Corps
officers 99 and Chaney himself was a command pilot of long standing,
but initial contingents of the U.S. Army bomber command found
some of his “G’s’’ at USAFBI “not very friendly to Air effort.” loo
As for the efforts to have Chaney’s directive modified, time and the
maturing of Anglo-American strategy were to lend point to Arnold’s
arguments.
In January 1942, Arnold submitted to GHQ a chart illustrating the
organization he favored for USAFBI, and on the 21st received ten-
tative approval subject to Chaney’s concurrence.1o1 On the 26th,
Arnold enumerated for Marshall the air units scheduled for the
United Kingdom, both for 1942 and for eventual deployment, re-
questing that the War Department accept his chart as a “general
guide” and activate the air force and constituent commands (bomber,
interceptor, air base) which it called for.lo2The several headquarters
were ordered activated,lo3 but the War Department was not yet
fully committed to Arnold’s plan.
On 24 January, Arnold had informed Chaney of Marshall’s tenta-
tive approval of an air force for USAFBI with Spaatz as commander
and with three subordinate commands, suggesting that the force be
located in the York area.lo4Chaney objected to that site, preferring
5 8 2

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.