Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 2 THE UNIVERSITYOF CHICAGOPRESS, CHICAGO8 LONDON The University of Toronto Press, Toronto 5, Canada Copyright 1948 by…
  • p. 48 …An Associated Press dispatch of 10 October gave a contemporary judgment of the importance of this…
  • p. 55 …Air Service (Corps) found it difficult to press vigorously for reorgani- zation and, by default, leadership…
  • p. 56 …In 1919the W a r Department was pressing for a drastic revision of the military establishment…
  • p. 61 …It held that there was no danger of an air attack on the United States and…
  • p. 64 …GHQ Air Forcq a trial than to press for more radical measures, and Howell’s group…
  • p. 75 …Powerful air attacks resolutely pressed home could never be completely stopped, but their effects could best…
  • p. 98 …based air operations in defense of the United States and its overseas posses~ions.’~T w…
  • p. 99 …General Westover’s report concluded that “all Air Force units could be concentrated on either coast…
  • p. 130 …the Admiralty began to press for control of naval air units, while the army attempted to…
  • p. 149 …basic and advanced Responsibility for crew and unit train- ing was vested in the GHQ Air…
  • p. 164 …A m y air units in the Territory existed primarily for the defense of this and…
  • p. 176 …no military alliances were made which would commit the United States to war; the plans only…
  • p. 278 …There were also grounds for hoping that heavy bomber units now based on Darwin might increase…
  • p. 285 …From 1938 the United States had invoked sanctions against Japan in the form of moral em…
  • p. 287 …Over-all Strategy and lmmediate Deployment On 2 2 December, the press announced dramatically the arrival…
  • p. 289 …ground units sent in that direction were not destined for immediate combat. No major invasion of…
  • p. 323 …Seizure of bases in Canada or Mexico for later attacks on the United States. Capture of…
  • p. 366 …United state^,^ and the British them- selves were forced to withdraw some pilots from combat units…
  • p. 380 …Upon the request of the Ferrying Command, the State Depart- ment again pressed for an answer…
  • p. 397 …the summer and fall, first as the United States Middle East Air Force and later as…
  • p. 430 …Attempts had been made to replace these obsolete craft by purchase from the United States, but…
  • p. 440 …But as the Japanese pressed forward the Americans were given no opportunity to get set. The…
  • p. 463 …personnel that would be reassigned to infantry units whose rosters already included many representatives of the…
  • p. 552 …pines and more recently of American air units operating in the Netherlands East Indies, he was…
  • p. 560 …Moreover, examination proved that most of the basic equipment of the units, including badly needed trucks…
  • p. 563 …Grady arrived from the United States for a comprehensive survey of Indian resources with reference to…
  • p. 564 …TO C H I N A graphic units, and unfavorable atmospheric conditions combined to make high…
  • p. 607 …Thus the AAF units engaged in the anti-U-boat war became almost a t once…
  • p. 628 …Army air bombardment units would operate offensively in collaboration with the Royal Air Force, primarily against…
  • p. 658 …was to operate in the United Kingdom.14' All air units initially based there were to…
  • p. 683 …of the units of the infant Eighth until their departure for the United Kingdom several months…
  • p. 691 …The RAF proposed that American fighter units be integrated with its own under a plan eventually…
  • p. 748 …533.) By 1928he was (Patrick, United States in the Air, pp. 190-91.) 38. Charges of…
  • p. 770 …y.W D Press Release, 2 1 June 1941. 9 1 . AR 95-5, 3a. 92…
  • p. 857 …Presque Isle, 344, 347-49, 641, 644-45 Press comment: B-17, 662-63; danger of…
T H E A R M Y A I R F O R C E S I N W O R L D W A R I 1
planners should be ready with other alternatives: GYMNAST, or
campaigns in Norway or the Iberian peninsula.49Planning responsi-
bilities were divided, with the Americans taking GYMNAST, the
British the other two project^.^'
Actually the Washington conference had postponed rather than
decided the central issue of the second front for 1942, but with only
three months of favorable weather remaining, postponement was al-
most tantamount to refusal. Churchill was back in London by the
27th. In informed circles there it was generally accepted that there
would be no cross-Channel push that year.51 On 8 July the Prime
Minister informed Roosevelt that conditions favorable to SLEDGE-
HAMMER would probably not arise, and suggested that the Ameri-
cans push GYMNAST planning while the British worked on other
agreed alternative~.~~T o the Joint Chiefs of Staff, this message seemed
to endanger ROUNDUP as well as SLEDGEHAMMER. Unani-
mously in favor of BOLERO with either a 1942 or 1943 D-day, they
were equally opposed to GYMNAST as an expensive diversion of
dubious value. Since April, they had sensed a certain lack of en-
thusiasm among their British opposite members for a large-scale
invasion through France, and unless the British would support whole-
heartedly such a venture by 1943, the Joint Chiefs were prepared to
turn to the Pacific for a showdown with Japan.53
These views were communicated to the President on 10 July.54
A week later General Marshall, Admiral King, Harry Hopkins, and
a small staff flew to England to make a last endeavor to persuade the
British to go along with SLEDGEHAMMER. This the British were
unwilling to do. The memory of Dunkirk was still fresh and subse-
quent defeats in Africa had not lessened their respect for the German
army. They pointed again to practical difficulties which had been
urged in April and which they thought the Americans underestimated
-particularly the shortage in landing craft and the time factor. The
American position was the weaker because they could not in 1942
carry their share of the load. O n 2 2 July it was definitely agreed that
there would be no second front in Europe in 1 9 4 2 . ~ ~Discussion then
turned to those alternatives upon which the Combined Staff Planners
had been engaged.
O n the 24th, the U.S. Joint Chiefs presented a new proposal for
operations in 1942-43.56Preparations for ROUNDUP were to con-
tinue without abatement so long as the Russian situation seemed to
5 7 2

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.