Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 303 …of Naval Opera- tions; Adm. Ernest J. King, Commander in Chief, U.S. Fleet; Gen. George…
  • p. 316 …So far as the Navy is concerned, Admiral King, as you know, is not only Chief…
  • p. 493 …Admiral King believed that the mines offered a tempting bait to the Japanese who were currently…
  • p. 526 …Hence Admiral King placed a bid for suffi- 461
  • p. 527 …t this stage of the war Admiral King had accepted the belief that his carrier planes…
  • p. 538 …plan by 2 9 June, when Admiral King submitted to the Joint Chiefs a proposal that…
  • p. 607 …type * O n 5 March 1942, Admiral King wrote to General Arnold as follows: “The experience…
  • p. 608 …s.’l A formal request by Admiral King to the Chief of the Army Air Forces…
  • p. 609 …In a letter of 9 March 1942 to Admiral King, he proposed “the estab- lishment of…
  • p. 614 …In June, Admiral King expressed the official Navy position on this point with the utmost clarity…
  • p. 615 …In a memorandum to Admiral King, General McNarney, Deputy Chief of Staff, on 26 May outlined…
  • p. 616 …viewed as a temporary deta~hment.?~ Admiral King’s reaction to these cautious proposals was expressed…
  • p. 618 …the same words as used by Admiral King a month earlier: the answer to the antisubmarine…
  • p. 621 …On 14 September, General Marshall wrote to Admiral King: “Experience with the First Bomber Command in…
  • p. 622 …T o General Marshall’s proposal of 14 September, Admiral King had replied that, although he…
  • p. 641 …54 A week later General Marshall, Admiral King, Harry Hopkins, and a small staff flew to…
  • p. 645 …that scheduled to operate from the United King- dom. Dry topic or no, organization must figure…
  • p. 684 …the principal air task in the United King- dom had long been conceived as strategic bombardment…
  • p. 707 …establishment of base depots in the United King- dom became the basis of action in January…
  • p. 724 …Implicit in all of the arrangements being made in the United King- dom was the belief…
  • p. 788 …Force, Pt. I ; Fleet Adm. Ernest J. King, First Official Report to the Secretary of the…
  • p. 793 …Memo for Adm, King from C/S, 17 Mar. 1 % ~ . 34. JPS 2I/j/D, 7…
  • p. 795 …4 Aug. 1942. 108. Zbid. 109. Adm. King’s Report on Battle of Midway, incl. in…
  • p. 797 …306, 29 June 1942; memos for Adm. King from Mar- shall, 26 June 1942, and for…
  • p. 802 …1942; CM-IN-0629, Chung- king to AGWAR, # # z , 3 Apr. 1942; memo for Gen. Arnold…
  • p. 805 …Ltr., Arnold to King, 2 5 Feb. 1942. certain evidence from all Allied and enemy sources…
  • p. 806 …Memo for King from McNarney, 26 May 1942. 7 1 . Ltr., King to Marshall, 10 June…
  • p. 807 …Ltr., Marshall to King, 14 Sept. 1942, TAB XIVA, in Bowles report; memo for C G…
  • p. 808 …to notes from Mar- shall and Adm. King). 3 2 . A I c m o for…
  • p. 814 …Forces to the United King- dom, App. A, 19 Aug. 1942. 50. Ltr., Col. H.L…
  • p. 851 …C.E., 48-50 Killin, Pfc, 219 Kilner Board, 1 2 0 Kimbolton, 63 I King…
  • p. 854 …in Chief, 515, 5 2 2 , 544. (see also King); controversy over air power vs. battleship…
T H E A R M Y A I R F O R C E S I N W O R L D W A R I 1
planners should be ready with other alternatives: GYMNAST, or
campaigns in Norway or the Iberian peninsula.49Planning responsi-
bilities were divided, with the Americans taking GYMNAST, the
British the other two project^.^'
Actually the Washington conference had postponed rather than
decided the central issue of the second front for 1942, but with only
three months of favorable weather remaining, postponement was al-
most tantamount to refusal. Churchill was back in London by the
27th. In informed circles there it was generally accepted that there
would be no cross-Channel push that year.51 On 8 July the Prime
Minister informed Roosevelt that conditions favorable to SLEDGE-
HAMMER would probably not arise, and suggested that the Ameri-
cans push GYMNAST planning while the British worked on other
agreed alternative~.~~T o the Joint Chiefs of Staff, this message seemed
to endanger ROUNDUP as well as SLEDGEHAMMER. Unani-
mously in favor of BOLERO with either a 1942 or 1943 D-day, they
were equally opposed to GYMNAST as an expensive diversion of
dubious value. Since April, they had sensed a certain lack of en-
thusiasm among their British opposite members for a large-scale
invasion through France, and unless the British would support whole-
heartedly such a venture by 1943, the Joint Chiefs were prepared to
turn to the Pacific for a showdown with Japan.53
These views were communicated to the President on 10 July.54
A week later General Marshall, Admiral King, Harry Hopkins, and
a small staff flew to England to make a last endeavor to persuade the
British to go along with SLEDGEHAMMER. This the British were
unwilling to do. The memory of Dunkirk was still fresh and subse-
quent defeats in Africa had not lessened their respect for the German
army. They pointed again to practical difficulties which had been
urged in April and which they thought the Americans underestimated
-particularly the shortage in landing craft and the time factor. The
American position was the weaker because they could not in 1942
carry their share of the load. O n 2 2 July it was definitely agreed that
there would be no second front in Europe in 1 9 4 2 . ~ ~Discussion then
turned to those alternatives upon which the Combined Staff Planners
had been engaged.
O n the 24th, the U.S. Joint Chiefs presented a new proposal for
operations in 1942-43.56Preparations for ROUNDUP were to con-
tinue without abatement so long as the Russian situation seemed to
5 7 2

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.