Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 303 …of Naval Opera- tions; Adm. Ernest J. King, Commander in Chief, U.S. Fleet; Gen. George…
  • p. 316 …So far as the Navy is concerned, Admiral King, as you know, is not only Chief…
  • p. 493 …Admiral King believed that the mines offered a tempting bait to the Japanese who were currently…
  • p. 526 …Hence Admiral King placed a bid for suffi- 461
  • p. 527 …t this stage of the war Admiral King had accepted the belief that his carrier planes…
  • p. 538 …plan by 2 9 June, when Admiral King submitted to the Joint Chiefs a proposal that…
  • p. 607 …type * O n 5 March 1942, Admiral King wrote to General Arnold as follows: “The experience…
  • p. 608 …s.’l A formal request by Admiral King to the Chief of the Army Air Forces…
  • p. 609 …In a letter of 9 March 1942 to Admiral King, he proposed “the estab- lishment of…
  • p. 614 …In June, Admiral King expressed the official Navy position on this point with the utmost clarity…
  • p. 615 …In a memorandum to Admiral King, General McNarney, Deputy Chief of Staff, on 26 May outlined…
  • p. 616 …viewed as a temporary deta~hment.?~ Admiral King’s reaction to these cautious proposals was expressed…
  • p. 618 …the same words as used by Admiral King a month earlier: the answer to the antisubmarine…
  • p. 621 …On 14 September, General Marshall wrote to Admiral King: “Experience with the First Bomber Command in…
  • p. 622 …T o General Marshall’s proposal of 14 September, Admiral King had replied that, although he…
  • p. 641 …54 A week later General Marshall, Admiral King, Harry Hopkins, and a small staff flew to…
  • p. 645 …that scheduled to operate from the United King- dom. Dry topic or no, organization must figure…
  • p. 684 …the principal air task in the United King- dom had long been conceived as strategic bombardment…
  • p. 707 …establishment of base depots in the United King- dom became the basis of action in January…
  • p. 724 …Implicit in all of the arrangements being made in the United King- dom was the belief…
  • p. 788 …Force, Pt. I ; Fleet Adm. Ernest J. King, First Official Report to the Secretary of the…
  • p. 793 …Memo for Adm, King from C/S, 17 Mar. 1 % ~ . 34. JPS 2I/j/D, 7…
  • p. 795 …4 Aug. 1942. 108. Zbid. 109. Adm. King’s Report on Battle of Midway, incl. in…
  • p. 797 …306, 29 June 1942; memos for Adm. King from Mar- shall, 26 June 1942, and for…
  • p. 802 …1942; CM-IN-0629, Chung- king to AGWAR, # # z , 3 Apr. 1942; memo for Gen. Arnold…
  • p. 805 …Ltr., Arnold to King, 2 5 Feb. 1942. certain evidence from all Allied and enemy sources…
  • p. 806 …Memo for King from McNarney, 26 May 1942. 7 1 . Ltr., King to Marshall, 10 June…
  • p. 807 …Ltr., Marshall to King, 14 Sept. 1942, TAB XIVA, in Bowles report; memo for C G…
  • p. 808 …to notes from Mar- shall and Adm. King). 3 2 . A I c m o for…
  • p. 814 …Forces to the United King- dom, App. A, 19 Aug. 1942. 50. Ltr., Col. H.L…
  • p. 851 …C.E., 48-50 Killin, Pfc, 219 Kilner Board, 1 2 0 Kimbolton, 63 I King…
  • p. 854 …in Chief, 515, 5 2 2 , 544. (see also King); controversy over air power vs. battleship…
P L A N S , P O L I C I E S , A N D O R G A N I Z A T I O N
meager to serve as a reliable guide, but in general the British
were pessimistic concerning the Soviet Union’s chances of survival.
SLEDGEHAMMER had been always thought of as an emergency
operation, yet now the British chiefs of staff were dubious of its wis-
dom under any conditions: an operation of its contemplated mag-
nitude would offer little relief to the U.S.S.R., and if that country
collapsed the expedition might prove a serious tactical loss. The
British had been examining alternative projects-a lodgment at Brest
or Cherbourg, large-scale raids (Dieppe was then in the offing), or a
campaign in Norway-and they understood that President Roosevelt’s
anxiety to get U.S. troops into action in 1942 had led him to examine
other possibilities, including an offensive from Australia and the re-
vival of GYMNAST.45 The latter plan might offer effective relief
to Auchinleck in the Middle East-a second front to benefit the Brit-
ish rather than the Soviets; yet after mature deliberation, the Com-
bined Chiefs stood squarely and “without reservations” behind
decisions made at London in mid-April. Those decisions were indorsed
in an informal meeting on 19 June,46and more definitively in a paper
approved on the z IS^,^? Therein it was declared as considered opinions
of the CCS that: ( I ) the United States and Great Britain should ad-
here to their resolve ro push BOLERO; ( 2 ) no other offensive opera-
tion should be undertaken in 1942 save in a grave emergency; ( 3 )
specifically, GYMNAST should not be adopted under existing
conditions; and (4) planning for an emergency attack on western
Europe in 1942 should be continued. This should have left
ROUNDUP with highest priority, SLEDGEHAMMER a possi-
bility, and ruled out their most formidable rival, the North African
operation. What happened at the government level is not entirely
clear. Brig. Gen. Asa N. Duncan, chief of staff for the Eighth Air
Force, wrote from Washington to Spaatz that Churchill had made a
successful plea to the President “for a lot of assistance in the Middle
East,” despite objections from the American chiefs of staff .48 The
formal record of the Combined Chiefs indicates no sudden change in
strategy. On Z I June, a t a White House meeting, the President and
Prime Minister accepted the sense of the CCS recommendations,
though with an escape clause. Plans for ROUNDUP in 1943 were to
be pushed, but the two nations must be prepared to act in 1942.
Operations in France or the Low Countries would yield greatest re-
sults and should be considered, but if they appeared impractical, the
57’

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.