Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 303 …of Naval Opera- tions; Adm. Ernest J. King, Commander in Chief, U.S. Fleet; Gen. George…
  • p. 316 …So far as the Navy is concerned, Admiral King, as you know, is not only Chief…
  • p. 493 …Admiral King believed that the mines offered a tempting bait to the Japanese who were currently…
  • p. 526 …Hence Admiral King placed a bid for suffi- 461
  • p. 527 …t this stage of the war Admiral King had accepted the belief that his carrier planes…
  • p. 538 …plan by 2 9 June, when Admiral King submitted to the Joint Chiefs a proposal that…
  • p. 607 …type * O n 5 March 1942, Admiral King wrote to General Arnold as follows: “The experience…
  • p. 608 …s.’l A formal request by Admiral King to the Chief of the Army Air Forces…
  • p. 609 …In a letter of 9 March 1942 to Admiral King, he proposed “the estab- lishment of…
  • p. 614 …In June, Admiral King expressed the official Navy position on this point with the utmost clarity…
  • p. 615 …In a memorandum to Admiral King, General McNarney, Deputy Chief of Staff, on 26 May outlined…
  • p. 616 …viewed as a temporary deta~hment.?~ Admiral King’s reaction to these cautious proposals was expressed…
  • p. 618 …the same words as used by Admiral King a month earlier: the answer to the antisubmarine…
  • p. 621 …On 14 September, General Marshall wrote to Admiral King: “Experience with the First Bomber Command in…
  • p. 622 …T o General Marshall’s proposal of 14 September, Admiral King had replied that, although he…
  • p. 641 …54 A week later General Marshall, Admiral King, Harry Hopkins, and a small staff flew to…
  • p. 645 …that scheduled to operate from the United King- dom. Dry topic or no, organization must figure…
  • p. 684 …the principal air task in the United King- dom had long been conceived as strategic bombardment…
  • p. 707 …establishment of base depots in the United King- dom became the basis of action in January…
  • p. 724 …Implicit in all of the arrangements being made in the United King- dom was the belief…
  • p. 788 …Force, Pt. I ; Fleet Adm. Ernest J. King, First Official Report to the Secretary of the…
  • p. 793 …Memo for Adm, King from C/S, 17 Mar. 1 % ~ . 34. JPS 2I/j/D, 7…
  • p. 795 …4 Aug. 1942. 108. Zbid. 109. Adm. King’s Report on Battle of Midway, incl. in…
  • p. 797 …306, 29 June 1942; memos for Adm. King from Mar- shall, 26 June 1942, and for…
  • p. 802 …1942; CM-IN-0629, Chung- king to AGWAR, # # z , 3 Apr. 1942; memo for Gen. Arnold…
  • p. 805 …Ltr., Arnold to King, 2 5 Feb. 1942. certain evidence from all Allied and enemy sources…
  • p. 806 …Memo for King from McNarney, 26 May 1942. 7 1 . Ltr., King to Marshall, 10 June…
  • p. 807 …Ltr., Marshall to King, 14 Sept. 1942, TAB XIVA, in Bowles report; memo for C G…
  • p. 808 …to notes from Mar- shall and Adm. King). 3 2 . A I c m o for…
  • p. 814 …Forces to the United King- dom, App. A, 19 Aug. 1942. 50. Ltr., Col. H.L…
  • p. 851 …C.E., 48-50 Killin, Pfc, 219 Kilner Board, 1 2 0 Kimbolton, 63 I King…
  • p. 854 …in Chief, 515, 5 2 2 , 544. (see also King); controversy over air power vs. battleship…
T H E A R M Y A I R F O R C E S I N W O R L D W A R I 1
allies, which must be met out of their respective allotments. But for
the AAF it substantially narrowed the gap between prospective com-
bat crews and combat planes, and it gave promise of providing a
strong air force for BOLERO. Within a few weeks’ time, however,
that promise was to be blighted by a sudden reversal of strategy.
In London, on 18 June, General Spaatz assumed command of the
Eighth Air Force, the organization which had been created to carry
the AAF’s responsibilities in BOLERO.4z On the same date Mr.
Churchill arrived in Washington with a small staff. Publicly it was
announced that “the object in view is the earliest maximum concen-
tration of Allied war power upon the enemy.” 4 3 In the privacy of
the ensuing CCS conference, a British member ascribed the visit to
the Prime Minister’s desire to discuss the co-ordination and “possible
reorientation” of combined p01icy.~”In plainer English, he was not
too keen about BOLERO.
Much had happened in the two months which had passed since
Churchill had approved that plan. Japanese naval losses in the Coral
Sea and at Midway had eased somewhat the tension in the Pacific; the
monsoon, rather than Allied successes, had for the moment lessened
the threat to India. Elsewhere the news was bad. The long-dreaded
summer campaign in Russia was in full swing. Mannstein had con-
quered the Crimea, was hammering at the inner defenses of Sevas-
topol. Timoshenko’s winter campaign below Kharkov had failed, and
German armies were already launched in their drive for the Caucasus
with its oil fields and its route to the Middle East. Nazi successes in
North Africa were equally alarming. There Rommel had opened his
offensive in May, driving the British back and defeating them de-
cisively a t Knightsbridge on 1 3 June. Tobruk with its large British
garrison was to surrender on the 2 Ist, while the conference was still
in session, and a week later the retreating Eighth Army was to pull
up for a last stand at El Alamein, hardly seventy-five miles west of
Alexandria. With or without Japanese aid, the Germans constituted
a menace to the Middle East and all it stood for-rich resources, the
lend-lease route to Russia, and Britain’s link with India and the South-
west Pacific.
If the British interest in Egypt was most immediate, that fact was
not stressed in the discussions of the Combined Chiefs of Staff. Ac-
cepted strategy for 1942-43 was contingent upon the progress of
events in Russia. Intelligence available in Washington was still too
5 7 0

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.