The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

T H E A R M Y A I R F O R C E S I N W O R L D W A R I 1
the United States and Great Britain (and through them to other user
nations) in the Arnold-Portal agreement.* Based on the principle that
aircraft allocation should be guided by immediate ability to use the
planes in combat, the agreement had provided for revision when war-
ranted by changing conditions. In Washington the Munitions Assign-
ments Board t had never considered this schedule as more than a
temporary guide, and by May of 1942it was apparent that the related
problems of allocation and deployment must be restudied.
That need had been implied by the British memorandum of 2 2 Feb-
ruary. Now that the SLEDGEHAMMERJROUNDUP strategy had
been accepted, the RAF wanted the United States to increase the allo-
cation of P-40’s for the Middle East in return for Spitfires to equip
AAF fighter units in England, by which expedient RAF Fighter
Command might build a reserve against the heavier losses which an in-
tensive offensive in Europe would On the American side there
were equally cogent reasons: unexpected attrition in the Pacific; the
rapid expansion of the training program with its operational training
units crying for combat planes; and the natural desire of the public
that US. planes be flown by U.S. crews. The demand from theaters
of U.S. responsibility for additional aircraft continued strong. That
was particularly true of the Southwest Pacific, where MacArthur
had assumed command on 18 April. A fortnight later, the Joint Chiefs
of Staff were alarmed by a query from Roosevelt as to whether air-
craft strength in Australia “could properly be” increased to 1,000,
ground forces to IOO,OOO. The question seemed momentarily to in-
dicate some wavering in purpose, but the President immediately
explained that his message had been merely an inquiry, not a directive.
H e wished to deploy in the Southwest Pacific only enough planes to
fulfil present objectives, and desired that existing arrangements for
Europe be carried out: “I do not want ‘Bolero’ slowed down.” s1
This was on 6 May; on the 17th he repeated the sentiment,s2 and a
week later a group of high-ranking Army and Navy officers left for
London for further discussion of BOLERO needs. In the group were
General Arnold and Rear Adm. John H. Towers of the Navy’s
Bureau of Aeronautics. They had been directed to confer with Portal
and a representative of the Fleet Air Arm, and to draw up a new
* See above, pp. 248-49.
t See above, p. 249.
566