Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 303 …of Naval Opera- tions; Adm. Ernest J. King, Commander in Chief, U.S. Fleet; Gen. George…
  • p. 316 …So far as the Navy is concerned, Admiral King, as you know, is not only Chief…
  • p. 493 …Admiral King believed that the mines offered a tempting bait to the Japanese who were currently…
  • p. 526 …Hence Admiral King placed a bid for suffi- 461
  • p. 527 …t this stage of the war Admiral King had accepted the belief that his carrier planes…
  • p. 538 …plan by 2 9 June, when Admiral King submitted to the Joint Chiefs a proposal that…
  • p. 607 …type * O n 5 March 1942, Admiral King wrote to General Arnold as follows: “The experience…
  • p. 608 …s.’l A formal request by Admiral King to the Chief of the Army Air Forces…
  • p. 609 …In a letter of 9 March 1942 to Admiral King, he proposed “the estab- lishment of…
  • p. 614 …In June, Admiral King expressed the official Navy position on this point with the utmost clarity…
  • p. 615 …In a memorandum to Admiral King, General McNarney, Deputy Chief of Staff, on 26 May outlined…
  • p. 616 …viewed as a temporary deta~hment.?~ Admiral King’s reaction to these cautious proposals was expressed…
  • p. 618 …the same words as used by Admiral King a month earlier: the answer to the antisubmarine…
  • p. 621 …On 14 September, General Marshall wrote to Admiral King: “Experience with the First Bomber Command in…
  • p. 622 …T o General Marshall’s proposal of 14 September, Admiral King had replied that, although he…
  • p. 641 …54 A week later General Marshall, Admiral King, Harry Hopkins, and a small staff flew to…
  • p. 645 …that scheduled to operate from the United King- dom. Dry topic or no, organization must figure…
  • p. 684 …the principal air task in the United King- dom had long been conceived as strategic bombardment…
  • p. 707 …establishment of base depots in the United King- dom became the basis of action in January…
  • p. 724 …Implicit in all of the arrangements being made in the United King- dom was the belief…
  • p. 788 …Force, Pt. I ; Fleet Adm. Ernest J. King, First Official Report to the Secretary of the…
  • p. 793 …Memo for Adm, King from C/S, 17 Mar. 1 % ~ . 34. JPS 2I/j/D, 7…
  • p. 795 …4 Aug. 1942. 108. Zbid. 109. Adm. King’s Report on Battle of Midway, incl. in…
  • p. 797 …306, 29 June 1942; memos for Adm. King from Mar- shall, 26 June 1942, and for…
  • p. 802 …1942; CM-IN-0629, Chung- king to AGWAR, # # z , 3 Apr. 1942; memo for Gen. Arnold…
  • p. 805 …Ltr., Arnold to King, 2 5 Feb. 1942. certain evidence from all Allied and enemy sources…
  • p. 806 …Memo for King from McNarney, 26 May 1942. 7 1 . Ltr., King to Marshall, 10 June…
  • p. 807 …Ltr., Marshall to King, 14 Sept. 1942, TAB XIVA, in Bowles report; memo for C G…
  • p. 808 …to notes from Mar- shall and Adm. King). 3 2 . A I c m o for…
  • p. 814 …Forces to the United King- dom, App. A, 19 Aug. 1942. 50. Ltr., Col. H.L…
  • p. 851 …C.E., 48-50 Killin, Pfc, 219 Kilner Board, 1 2 0 Kimbolton, 63 I King…
  • p. 854 …in Chief, 515, 5 2 2 , 544. (see also King); controversy over air power vs. battleship…
T H E A R M Y A I R F O R C E S I N W O R L D W A R I 1
transport planes; this force he was willing to commit if it became
expedient.2
The British replied that they had been thinking along similar lines-
of a grand invasion in 1943, or an earlier one if the Soviets were facing
defeat or if the Germans showed signs of cracking.23They enumer-
ated practical difficulties which would make an invasion in 1942
extremely hazardous-the limited period of favorable weather which
could be expected; the serious shortages in shipping, in landing craft,
and in air strength; and other factors which seemed scarcely to disturb
the ordinary citizen who was crying for a second front, but of which
General Marshall was painfully aware. Yet after further study of
Marshall’s plan, the British on 14 April accepted it in principle; the
main preparations should be timed for the following spring, with con-
current arrangements for a lesser operation in 1942 if circumstances
demanded.24The Prime Minister, in a radio message of 1 7 April, in-
formed Roosevelt of his approval of the design; his sole proviso was
that the Japanese and Germans must be prevented from joining forces
in the Middle East. If that could be forestalled, he advocated a cre-
scendo of activities against the continent, “starting with an ever-
increasing air offensive both by night and day.” 2 5 His message may
be taken as the official launching of the strategy which was to culmi-
nate, a year behind schedule, on 6 June 1944.
The Combined Staff Planners immediately began the long and
intricate task of preparing for the movement, reception, and mainte-
nance of the expeditionary force.26This phase of the operation was
called BOLERO; the main invasion of spring 1943 was ROUNDUP,
the earlier emergency landing, SLEDGEHAMMER. BOLERO com-
mittees, with representatives of the several services of both nations,
were established in Washington and London. Uncertainty as to which
operation would be mounted made planning difficult for the AAF; its
equipment and its role would be determined by the final choice
between the two alternatives.
The mission assigned to the AAF by the Combined Chiefs had been
phrased in most general terms: the conduct in co-operation with the
RAF of an offensive against western Europe in 1942. If SLEDGE-
HAMMER became necessary, the AAF could contribute little to
the preliminary strategic bombardment and only modestly to direct
support of the invading force. A decision to hold off until
ROUNDUP would enhance greatly the weight of the bomber offen-
564

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.