Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 303 …of Naval Opera- tions; Adm. Ernest J. King, Commander in Chief, U.S. Fleet; Gen. George…
  • p. 316 …So far as the Navy is concerned, Admiral King, as you know, is not only Chief…
  • p. 493 …Admiral King believed that the mines offered a tempting bait to the Japanese who were currently…
  • p. 526 …Hence Admiral King placed a bid for suffi- 461
  • p. 527 …t this stage of the war Admiral King had accepted the belief that his carrier planes…
  • p. 538 …plan by 2 9 June, when Admiral King submitted to the Joint Chiefs a proposal that…
  • p. 607 …type * O n 5 March 1942, Admiral King wrote to General Arnold as follows: “The experience…
  • p. 608 …s.’l A formal request by Admiral King to the Chief of the Army Air Forces…
  • p. 609 …In a letter of 9 March 1942 to Admiral King, he proposed “the estab- lishment of…
  • p. 614 …In June, Admiral King expressed the official Navy position on this point with the utmost clarity…
  • p. 615 …In a memorandum to Admiral King, General McNarney, Deputy Chief of Staff, on 26 May outlined…
  • p. 616 …viewed as a temporary deta~hment.?~ Admiral King’s reaction to these cautious proposals was expressed…
  • p. 618 …the same words as used by Admiral King a month earlier: the answer to the antisubmarine…
  • p. 621 …On 14 September, General Marshall wrote to Admiral King: “Experience with the First Bomber Command in…
  • p. 622 …T o General Marshall’s proposal of 14 September, Admiral King had replied that, although he…
  • p. 641 …54 A week later General Marshall, Admiral King, Harry Hopkins, and a small staff flew to…
  • p. 645 …that scheduled to operate from the United King- dom. Dry topic or no, organization must figure…
  • p. 684 …the principal air task in the United King- dom had long been conceived as strategic bombardment…
  • p. 707 …establishment of base depots in the United King- dom became the basis of action in January…
  • p. 724 …Implicit in all of the arrangements being made in the United King- dom was the belief…
  • p. 788 …Force, Pt. I ; Fleet Adm. Ernest J. King, First Official Report to the Secretary of the…
  • p. 793 …Memo for Adm, King from C/S, 17 Mar. 1 % ~ . 34. JPS 2I/j/D, 7…
  • p. 795 …4 Aug. 1942. 108. Zbid. 109. Adm. King’s Report on Battle of Midway, incl. in…
  • p. 797 …306, 29 June 1942; memos for Adm. King from Mar- shall, 26 June 1942, and for…
  • p. 802 …1942; CM-IN-0629, Chung- king to AGWAR, # # z , 3 Apr. 1942; memo for Gen. Arnold…
  • p. 805 …Ltr., Arnold to King, 2 5 Feb. 1942. certain evidence from all Allied and enemy sources…
  • p. 806 …Memo for King from McNarney, 26 May 1942. 7 1 . Ltr., King to Marshall, 10 June…
  • p. 807 …Ltr., Marshall to King, 14 Sept. 1942, TAB XIVA, in Bowles report; memo for C G…
  • p. 808 …to notes from Mar- shall and Adm. King). 3 2 . A I c m o for…
  • p. 814 …Forces to the United King- dom, App. A, 19 Aug. 1942. 50. Ltr., Col. H.L…
  • p. 851 …C.E., 48-50 Killin, Pfc, 219 Kilner Board, 1 2 0 Kimbolton, 63 I King…
  • p. 854 …in Chief, 515, 5 2 2 , 544. (see also King); controversy over air power vs. battleship…
P L A N S , P O L I C I E S , A N D O R G A N I Z A T I O N
little political imagination to foresee the nature of the coming con-
gressional elections if operations in the chosen theater were indefi-
nitely postponed.
The American position in respect to a second front was not with-
out a certain weakness. What with the current rate of production,
the heavy materiel responsibilities to allies, the status of trained units,
and, above all, the dearth of shipping, the United States could not at
an early date deploy and support in a European campaign any large
forces. This meant that the British must bear the heaviest initial bur-
den, and in March there was some doubt in the General Staff that
they would underwrite a large-scale operation under those condi-
t i o n ~ . ’ ~Nevertheless, study on the projected invasion continued
throughout March, and on the 27th, WPD was ready with its “Plan
for Operations in Northwest Europe.” Three days later AWPD added
its accompanying plan for air operations.*’ The project called for an
invasion of northern France either in autumn 1942 or spring 1943.
There were to be four phases of air activities: preparation and train-
ing; a preliminary strategic bombardment campaign; close support of
ground forces during and after the landing; and a return to strategic
targets when the proper equipment was released from covering the
landing. The Combined Staff Planners doubted that the requisite air
superiority could be achieved by September, but were confident of
success by the following spring.”
The plan was approved in principle by President Roosevelt, and on
8 April General Marshall and Harry Hopltins arrived in London to
elicit British support. In his first meeting with the Chiefs of Staff
Committee on the gth, Marshall urged that a firm decision be reached
soon as to the locality and timing of the main Anglo-American effort;
this was needed to guide production, allocation, training, troop move-
ments, and the like. American preference for an early assault on
western Europe he ascribed to the necessity of aiding the Red army
and the desire to get U.S. troops into an active theater where they
could gain experience in large-scale operations. The United States,
because of its heavy commitments elsewhere, could not build up a
great force in England before spring 1943; but if the Russian situation
deteriorated badly, it might be necessary to mount a more modest
6L emergency operation.” By mid-September the Army would have in
the United Kingdom one armored and two and one-half infantry
divisions, supported by some 400 pursuits, 300 bombers, and zoo
563

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.