Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 2 THE UNIVERSITYOF CHICAGOPRESS, CHICAGO8 LONDON The University of Toronto Press, Toronto 5, Canada Copyright 1948 by…
  • p. 48 …An Associated Press dispatch of 10 October gave a contemporary judgment of the importance of this…
  • p. 55 …Air Service (Corps) found it difficult to press vigorously for reorgani- zation and, by default, leadership…
  • p. 56 …In 1919the W a r Department was pressing for a drastic revision of the military establishment…
  • p. 61 …It held that there was no danger of an air attack on the United States and…
  • p. 64 …GHQ Air Forcq a trial than to press for more radical measures, and Howell’s group…
  • p. 75 …Powerful air attacks resolutely pressed home could never be completely stopped, but their effects could best…
  • p. 98 …based air operations in defense of the United States and its overseas posses~ions.’~T w…
  • p. 99 …General Westover’s report concluded that “all Air Force units could be concentrated on either coast…
  • p. 130 …the Admiralty began to press for control of naval air units, while the army attempted to…
  • p. 149 …basic and advanced Responsibility for crew and unit train- ing was vested in the GHQ Air…
  • p. 164 …A m y air units in the Territory existed primarily for the defense of this and…
  • p. 176 …no military alliances were made which would commit the United States to war; the plans only…
  • p. 278 …There were also grounds for hoping that heavy bomber units now based on Darwin might increase…
  • p. 285 …From 1938 the United States had invoked sanctions against Japan in the form of moral em…
  • p. 287 …Over-all Strategy and lmmediate Deployment On 2 2 December, the press announced dramatically the arrival…
  • p. 289 …ground units sent in that direction were not destined for immediate combat. No major invasion of…
  • p. 323 …Seizure of bases in Canada or Mexico for later attacks on the United States. Capture of…
  • p. 366 …United state^,^ and the British them- selves were forced to withdraw some pilots from combat units…
  • p. 380 …Upon the request of the Ferrying Command, the State Depart- ment again pressed for an answer…
  • p. 397 …the summer and fall, first as the United States Middle East Air Force and later as…
  • p. 430 …Attempts had been made to replace these obsolete craft by purchase from the United States, but…
  • p. 440 …But as the Japanese pressed forward the Americans were given no opportunity to get set. The…
  • p. 463 …personnel that would be reassigned to infantry units whose rosters already included many representatives of the…
  • p. 552 …pines and more recently of American air units operating in the Netherlands East Indies, he was…
  • p. 560 …Moreover, examination proved that most of the basic equipment of the units, including badly needed trucks…
  • p. 563 …Grady arrived from the United States for a comprehensive survey of Indian resources with reference to…
  • p. 564 …TO C H I N A graphic units, and unfavorable atmospheric conditions combined to make high…
  • p. 607 …Thus the AAF units engaged in the anti-U-boat war became almost a t once…
  • p. 628 …Army air bombardment units would operate offensively in collaboration with the Royal Air Force, primarily against…
  • p. 658 …was to operate in the United Kingdom.14' All air units initially based there were to…
  • p. 683 …of the units of the infant Eighth until their departure for the United Kingdom several months…
  • p. 691 …The RAF proposed that American fighter units be integrated with its own under a plan eventually…
  • p. 748 …533.) By 1928he was (Patrick, United States in the Air, pp. 190-91.) 38. Charges of…
  • p. 770 …y.W D Press Release, 2 1 June 1941. 9 1 . AR 95-5, 3a. 92…
  • p. 857 …Presque Isle, 344, 347-49, 641, 644-45 Press comment: B-17, 662-63; danger of…
T H E A R M Y A I R F O R C E S I N W O R L D W A R I 1
heavy bombardment groups before too long-his guess of “about
March or April” was only a “shot in the dark.” Within the Air
Staff it was estimated that out of the 115-group program, sixteen
bombardment and five pursuit groups would be available for the task
force in the United Kingdom. Most of these units would be ready
only in the last months of 1942, but the Air Staff, accepting a spring
date for planning purposes, gave to the two heavy bomber groups
and supporting units a high priority.’ Thus on 15 January they
listed projected task forces in this order of urgency: ( I ) Task Force X
(heavy bombers for Australia); ( 2 ) Task Force FIVE ISLANDS
(for defense of South Pacific ferry bases); ( 3 ) Task Force BR
(bomber force for United Kingdom); (4) GYMNAST (Northwest
Africa); (5) MAGNET (Northern Ireland); (6) Task Force
CAIRO (to Egypt).g On 2 7 January the Combined Chiefs of Staff
agreed that the first two heavy bomber groups available should be
assigned to an American bomber command in the British Isles, to
“operate independently in cooperation with the British Bomber
Command.” l o Detailed plans for the initial movement of forces, now
calculated for I 5 May, were prepared for the Combined Staff Planners
by AWPD.” The task of building an organization for the proposed
force was begun under supervision of Maj. Gen. Carl Spaatz, com-
manding general of the Air Force Combat Command and designated
leader of the Army Air Forces in Great Britain. On 4 February,
Brig. Gen. Ira C. Eaker, chosen to head up the bomber command,
left for England to arrange for the reception of the initial units.”
In view of the fluid tactical situation and the conflicting demands
from every theater, it was to be expected that AWPD’s suggested
allocation to Task Force BR of z I groups from the I I 5-group pro-
gram would be subject to later modification. More disconcerting was
the competition for the initial units earmarked by the CCS on 2 7
January and already tentatively designated by number in the AAF.13
Again it was enemy victories and their repercussions which threat-
ened accepted priorities. Reinforcements to Australia and the South
Pacific were dispatched pretty much as planned. MAGNET offered
little effective competition either immediately, or as time was to prove,
in the future. GYMNAST was shelved in March and was for a few
months out of the picture. But in the late winter and early spring
of 1942, the Middle East loomed as a new danger spot, perhaps as
the key to Axis strategy. At ARCADIA, Sir Charles Portal had
560

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.