Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 14 …with the commanding general, who in some instances moved in advance of promptings from Wash- ington…
  • p. 25 …EASTERNAND WESTERNAPPROACHESTO PANAMACANAL ALASKAAND THE ALEUTIANISLANDS PRINCIPALSEAAND AIR ROUTESAS DESIGNATEDBY WASH- ATLANTICFERRYINGAND TRANSPORTROUTESPRIORTO . . . . . . . . . . 297 30' 305…
  • p. 229 …the importance of the Far East Air Force in American strategy, the Air Staff in Wash…
  • p. 292 …Even so, there was in Wash- ington too little intelligence concerning the fluid tactical situation to…
  • p. 302 …The suggestion had been carried out in 1941 with the establishment of the U.S. Special…
  • p. 306 …work permanently with the British Joint Intelligence Committee in Wash- ington. The Combined Military Transportation Committee…
  • p. 389 …to delay the take-off was granted only after an appeal to Wash- ington.’O 3…
  • p. 442 …the time and attention of U.S. officers at Brisbane and of headquarters in Wash- ington…
  • p. 443 …Accidents delayed three planes en route, and one of the P-40’s was completely “washed…
  • p. 454 …promise of weakening the enemy. Attention already had been given in Wash- ington to establishment of…
  • p. 554 …In China, he found the procurement of necessary equipment, even be- fore the outbreak of war…
  • p. 636 …After further negotiations in Wash- ington, the Arnold-Towers-Portal agreement was adopted on z I…
  • p. 693 …Accordingly, Wash- ington was requested to send immediately 50 intelligence officers for training by the RAF…
  • p. 747 …before the Committee on Military Af- fairs, House of Representatives (Wash- 23. See, for instance, William…
  • p. 772 …The exact date of the arrival of air units is not known, as the latter source…
  • p. 799 …The road from Haiphong, Indo- China, to Yunnan was closed by the Vichy government in 1940…
  • p. 814 …Overseas (Ferrying), Air Min- istry, Memorandum on the Movement by Air of US. Forces to the…
T H E A R M Y A I R F O R C E S I N W O R L D W A R I 1
heavy bombardment groups before too long-his guess of “about
March or April” was only a “shot in the dark.” Within the Air
Staff it was estimated that out of the 115-group program, sixteen
bombardment and five pursuit groups would be available for the task
force in the United Kingdom. Most of these units would be ready
only in the last months of 1942, but the Air Staff, accepting a spring
date for planning purposes, gave to the two heavy bomber groups
and supporting units a high priority.’ Thus on 15 January they
listed projected task forces in this order of urgency: ( I ) Task Force X
(heavy bombers for Australia); ( 2 ) Task Force FIVE ISLANDS
(for defense of South Pacific ferry bases); ( 3 ) Task Force BR
(bomber force for United Kingdom); (4) GYMNAST (Northwest
Africa); (5) MAGNET (Northern Ireland); (6) Task Force
CAIRO (to Egypt).g On 2 7 January the Combined Chiefs of Staff
agreed that the first two heavy bomber groups available should be
assigned to an American bomber command in the British Isles, to
“operate independently in cooperation with the British Bomber
Command.” l o Detailed plans for the initial movement of forces, now
calculated for I 5 May, were prepared for the Combined Staff Planners
by AWPD.” The task of building an organization for the proposed
force was begun under supervision of Maj. Gen. Carl Spaatz, com-
manding general of the Air Force Combat Command and designated
leader of the Army Air Forces in Great Britain. On 4 February,
Brig. Gen. Ira C. Eaker, chosen to head up the bomber command,
left for England to arrange for the reception of the initial units.”
In view of the fluid tactical situation and the conflicting demands
from every theater, it was to be expected that AWPD’s suggested
allocation to Task Force BR of z I groups from the I I 5-group pro-
gram would be subject to later modification. More disconcerting was
the competition for the initial units earmarked by the CCS on 2 7
January and already tentatively designated by number in the AAF.13
Again it was enemy victories and their repercussions which threat-
ened accepted priorities. Reinforcements to Australia and the South
Pacific were dispatched pretty much as planned. MAGNET offered
little effective competition either immediately, or as time was to prove,
in the future. GYMNAST was shelved in March and was for a few
months out of the picture. But in the late winter and early spring
of 1942, the Middle East loomed as a new danger spot, perhaps as
the key to Axis strategy. At ARCADIA, Sir Charles Portal had
560

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.