Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 303 …of Naval Opera- tions; Adm. Ernest J. King, Commander in Chief, U.S. Fleet; Gen. George…
  • p. 316 …So far as the Navy is concerned, Admiral King, as you know, is not only Chief…
  • p. 493 …Admiral King believed that the mines offered a tempting bait to the Japanese who were currently…
  • p. 526 …Hence Admiral King placed a bid for suffi- 461
  • p. 527 …t this stage of the war Admiral King had accepted the belief that his carrier planes…
  • p. 538 …plan by 2 9 June, when Admiral King submitted to the Joint Chiefs a proposal that…
  • p. 607 …type * O n 5 March 1942, Admiral King wrote to General Arnold as follows: “The experience…
  • p. 608 …s.’l A formal request by Admiral King to the Chief of the Army Air Forces…
  • p. 609 …In a letter of 9 March 1942 to Admiral King, he proposed “the estab- lishment of…
  • p. 614 …In June, Admiral King expressed the official Navy position on this point with the utmost clarity…
  • p. 615 …In a memorandum to Admiral King, General McNarney, Deputy Chief of Staff, on 26 May outlined…
  • p. 616 …viewed as a temporary deta~hment.?~ Admiral King’s reaction to these cautious proposals was expressed…
  • p. 618 …the same words as used by Admiral King a month earlier: the answer to the antisubmarine…
  • p. 621 …On 14 September, General Marshall wrote to Admiral King: “Experience with the First Bomber Command in…
  • p. 622 …T o General Marshall’s proposal of 14 September, Admiral King had replied that, although he…
  • p. 641 …54 A week later General Marshall, Admiral King, Harry Hopkins, and a small staff flew to…
  • p. 645 …that scheduled to operate from the United King- dom. Dry topic or no, organization must figure…
  • p. 684 …the principal air task in the United King- dom had long been conceived as strategic bombardment…
  • p. 707 …establishment of base depots in the United King- dom became the basis of action in January…
  • p. 724 …Implicit in all of the arrangements being made in the United King- dom was the belief…
  • p. 788 …Force, Pt. I ; Fleet Adm. Ernest J. King, First Official Report to the Secretary of the…
  • p. 793 …Memo for Adm, King from C/S, 17 Mar. 1 % ~ . 34. JPS 2I/j/D, 7…
  • p. 795 …4 Aug. 1942. 108. Zbid. 109. Adm. King’s Report on Battle of Midway, incl. in…
  • p. 797 …306, 29 June 1942; memos for Adm. King from Mar- shall, 26 June 1942, and for…
  • p. 802 …1942; CM-IN-0629, Chung- king to AGWAR, # # z , 3 Apr. 1942; memo for Gen. Arnold…
  • p. 805 …Ltr., Arnold to King, 2 5 Feb. 1942. certain evidence from all Allied and enemy sources…
  • p. 806 …Memo for King from McNarney, 26 May 1942. 7 1 . Ltr., King to Marshall, 10 June…
  • p. 807 …Ltr., Marshall to King, 14 Sept. 1942, TAB XIVA, in Bowles report; memo for C G…
  • p. 808 …to notes from Mar- shall and Adm. King). 3 2 . A I c m o for…
  • p. 814 …Forces to the United King- dom, App. A, 19 Aug. 1942. 50. Ltr., Col. H.L…
  • p. 851 …C.E., 48-50 Killin, Pfc, 219 Kilner Board, 1 2 0 Kimbolton, 63 I King…
  • p. 854 …in Chief, 515, 5 2 2 , 544. (see also King); controversy over air power vs. battleship…
T H E A R M Y A I R F O R C E S I N W O R L D W A R I 1
heavy bombardment groups before too long-his guess of “about
March or April” was only a “shot in the dark.” Within the Air
Staff it was estimated that out of the 115-group program, sixteen
bombardment and five pursuit groups would be available for the task
force in the United Kingdom. Most of these units would be ready
only in the last months of 1942, but the Air Staff, accepting a spring
date for planning purposes, gave to the two heavy bomber groups
and supporting units a high priority.’ Thus on 15 January they
listed projected task forces in this order of urgency: ( I ) Task Force X
(heavy bombers for Australia); ( 2 ) Task Force FIVE ISLANDS
(for defense of South Pacific ferry bases); ( 3 ) Task Force BR
(bomber force for United Kingdom); (4) GYMNAST (Northwest
Africa); (5) MAGNET (Northern Ireland); (6) Task Force
CAIRO (to Egypt).g On 2 7 January the Combined Chiefs of Staff
agreed that the first two heavy bomber groups available should be
assigned to an American bomber command in the British Isles, to
“operate independently in cooperation with the British Bomber
Command.” l o Detailed plans for the initial movement of forces, now
calculated for I 5 May, were prepared for the Combined Staff Planners
by AWPD.” The task of building an organization for the proposed
force was begun under supervision of Maj. Gen. Carl Spaatz, com-
manding general of the Air Force Combat Command and designated
leader of the Army Air Forces in Great Britain. On 4 February,
Brig. Gen. Ira C. Eaker, chosen to head up the bomber command,
left for England to arrange for the reception of the initial units.”
In view of the fluid tactical situation and the conflicting demands
from every theater, it was to be expected that AWPD’s suggested
allocation to Task Force BR of z I groups from the I I 5-group pro-
gram would be subject to later modification. More disconcerting was
the competition for the initial units earmarked by the CCS on 2 7
January and already tentatively designated by number in the AAF.13
Again it was enemy victories and their repercussions which threat-
ened accepted priorities. Reinforcements to Australia and the South
Pacific were dispatched pretty much as planned. MAGNET offered
little effective competition either immediately, or as time was to prove,
in the future. GYMNAST was shelved in March and was for a few
months out of the picture. But in the late winter and early spring
of 1942, the Middle East loomed as a new danger spot, perhaps as
the key to Axis strategy. At ARCADIA, Sir Charles Portal had
560

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.