Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 2 THE UNIVERSITYOF CHICAGOPRESS, CHICAGO8 LONDON The University of Toronto Press, Toronto 5, Canada Copyright 1948 by…
  • p. 48 …An Associated Press dispatch of 10 October gave a contemporary judgment of the importance of this…
  • p. 55 …Air Service (Corps) found it difficult to press vigorously for reorgani- zation and, by default, leadership…
  • p. 56 …In 1919the W a r Department was pressing for a drastic revision of the military establishment…
  • p. 61 …It held that there was no danger of an air attack on the United States and…
  • p. 64 …GHQ Air Forcq a trial than to press for more radical measures, and Howell’s group…
  • p. 75 …Powerful air attacks resolutely pressed home could never be completely stopped, but their effects could best…
  • p. 98 …based air operations in defense of the United States and its overseas posses~ions.’~T w…
  • p. 99 …General Westover’s report concluded that “all Air Force units could be concentrated on either coast…
  • p. 130 …the Admiralty began to press for control of naval air units, while the army attempted to…
  • p. 149 …basic and advanced Responsibility for crew and unit train- ing was vested in the GHQ Air…
  • p. 164 …A m y air units in the Territory existed primarily for the defense of this and…
  • p. 176 …no military alliances were made which would commit the United States to war; the plans only…
  • p. 278 …There were also grounds for hoping that heavy bomber units now based on Darwin might increase…
  • p. 285 …From 1938 the United States had invoked sanctions against Japan in the form of moral em…
  • p. 287 …Over-all Strategy and lmmediate Deployment On 2 2 December, the press announced dramatically the arrival…
  • p. 289 …ground units sent in that direction were not destined for immediate combat. No major invasion of…
  • p. 323 …Seizure of bases in Canada or Mexico for later attacks on the United States. Capture of…
  • p. 366 …United state^,^ and the British them- selves were forced to withdraw some pilots from combat units…
  • p. 380 …Upon the request of the Ferrying Command, the State Depart- ment again pressed for an answer…
  • p. 397 …the summer and fall, first as the United States Middle East Air Force and later as…
  • p. 430 …Attempts had been made to replace these obsolete craft by purchase from the United States, but…
  • p. 440 …But as the Japanese pressed forward the Americans were given no opportunity to get set. The…
  • p. 463 …personnel that would be reassigned to infantry units whose rosters already included many representatives of the…
  • p. 552 …pines and more recently of American air units operating in the Netherlands East Indies, he was…
  • p. 560 …Moreover, examination proved that most of the basic equipment of the units, including badly needed trucks…
  • p. 563 …Grady arrived from the United States for a comprehensive survey of Indian resources with reference to…
  • p. 564 …TO C H I N A graphic units, and unfavorable atmospheric conditions combined to make high…
  • p. 607 …Thus the AAF units engaged in the anti-U-boat war became almost a t once…
  • p. 628 …Army air bombardment units would operate offensively in collaboration with the Royal Air Force, primarily against…
  • p. 658 …was to operate in the United Kingdom.14' All air units initially based there were to…
  • p. 683 …of the units of the infant Eighth until their departure for the United Kingdom several months…
  • p. 691 …The RAF proposed that American fighter units be integrated with its own under a plan eventually…
  • p. 748 …533.) By 1928he was (Patrick, United States in the Air, pp. 190-91.) 38. Charges of…
  • p. 770 …y.W D Press Release, 2 1 June 1941. 9 1 . AR 95-5, 3a. 92…
  • p. 857 …Presque Isle, 344, 347-49, 641, 644-45 Press comment: B-17, 662-63; danger of…
P L A N S , P O L I C I E S , A N D O R G A N I Z A T I O N
the recommendations of the Anglo-American staffs that the principal
war effort should be exerted first against Germany. The corollary
proposal, that “U.S. Army air bombardment units [would] operate
offensively in collaboration with the Royal Air Force, primarily
against German Military Power at its source,”l was accepted as
the AAF’s first and most important mission outside the Western
Hemisphere. When the President and Mr. Churchill met with their
military staffs in the ARCADIA conference they were still deter-
mined, “in spite of recent events,” to knock Germany out of the
war first. But any decision in respect to the bomber offensive had to
be made with a cautious eye on the immediate situation in the Pacific.”
At the first session of the conference, the two chiefs of state
agreed informally and tentatively that AAF heavy bombardment
units should be sent to England according to earlier designs.* When
that agreement was formally adopted by the Anglo-American chiefs
of staff on 1 3 January 1942, the phrasing ran simply that “the move-
ment of US Army Air Forces to the UK should proceed as soon as
forces and shipping become available so as to increase the weight of
attack on Germany.” The date of deployment and the size of the
force would depend upon a complex of factors, many of them rooted
in the Pacific war. This meant, then, a delay of indeterminate length
in the fulfilment of any long-term plan built, as had been AWPD/I,
around a huge bomber force in England. It meant also scrapping
earlier estimates of more immediate deployments. ABC- I had called
for thirty-two AAF squadrons in the United Kingdom in 1941;
the original RAINBOW No. 5 tables listed four groups of bombers
and three of pursuits, to which an additional bombardment group was
added in the revised tables of 19 November.“ T h e Air Staff would
have preferred a more flexible and realistic commitment-“Those air
forces as dictated by circumstance” ‘-but in any event it had been
presumed that a t outbreak of war, or even before, a substantial
air contingent should be sent to the British Isles. Now that war had
come, there were more pressing needs.
The British naturally were interested in the projected bomber
force, but were anxious that it be provided without jeopardy to
current allocation of heavy bombers to the RAF.6 N o immediate cut
was contemplated; and on I January, General Arnold told Air Chief
Marshal Sir Charles Portal that it might be possible to send two
See above, pp. 136-49,237-39.
559

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.