Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 258 …order to achieve this end we should cooperate with Japan fully un- quote.” Then: “ I 3…
  • p. 345 …seater aircraft operated by inexperienced personnel in cooperation with antiaircraft search- lights.” la‘ Many important objectives…
  • p. 425 …with brilliant judgment who must rely on cooperation,” * the ARCADIA conference of the British and American…
  • p. 566 …joined at Dinjan by Col. Merian C. Cooper. The task confronting them, to say the le…
  • p. 596 …There had even been talk of “mutual cooperation” rather than “unity of command.” Some firm decision…
  • p. 629 …the British Isles, to “operate independently in cooperation with the British Bomber Command.” l o Detailed…
  • p. 679 …the fullest agreement with the methods of cooperation which you propose and supremely confident that, at…
  • p. 793 …1942. 36. Ibid. 37. Col. Merian C. Cooper, Briefing 7'8 Officer, First Special Aviation Project…
  • p. 802 …Mar. 1943; talk by Col. M.C. Cooper in Gen. Johnson's Staff Meeting, 2 3…
  • p. 846 …5 5 2 Coolidge, President, 25, 28 Cooper, Col. M.C., 499 Coral Sea. Battle of…
P L A N S , P O L I C I E S , A N D O R G A N I Z A T I O N
the recommendations of the Anglo-American staffs that the principal
war effort should be exerted first against Germany. The corollary
proposal, that “U.S. Army air bombardment units [would] operate
offensively in collaboration with the Royal Air Force, primarily
against German Military Power at its source,”l was accepted as
the AAF’s first and most important mission outside the Western
Hemisphere. When the President and Mr. Churchill met with their
military staffs in the ARCADIA conference they were still deter-
mined, “in spite of recent events,” to knock Germany out of the
war first. But any decision in respect to the bomber offensive had to
be made with a cautious eye on the immediate situation in the Pacific.”
At the first session of the conference, the two chiefs of state
agreed informally and tentatively that AAF heavy bombardment
units should be sent to England according to earlier designs.* When
that agreement was formally adopted by the Anglo-American chiefs
of staff on 1 3 January 1942, the phrasing ran simply that “the move-
ment of US Army Air Forces to the UK should proceed as soon as
forces and shipping become available so as to increase the weight of
attack on Germany.” The date of deployment and the size of the
force would depend upon a complex of factors, many of them rooted
in the Pacific war. This meant, then, a delay of indeterminate length
in the fulfilment of any long-term plan built, as had been AWPD/I,
around a huge bomber force in England. It meant also scrapping
earlier estimates of more immediate deployments. ABC- I had called
for thirty-two AAF squadrons in the United Kingdom in 1941;
the original RAINBOW No. 5 tables listed four groups of bombers
and three of pursuits, to which an additional bombardment group was
added in the revised tables of 19 November.“ T h e Air Staff would
have preferred a more flexible and realistic commitment-“Those air
forces as dictated by circumstance” ‘-but in any event it had been
presumed that a t outbreak of war, or even before, a substantial
air contingent should be sent to the British Isles. Now that war had
come, there were more pressing needs.
The British naturally were interested in the projected bomber
force, but were anxious that it be provided without jeopardy to
current allocation of heavy bombers to the RAF.6 N o immediate cut
was contemplated; and on I January, General Arnold told Air Chief
Marshal Sir Charles Portal that it might be possible to send two
See above, pp. 136-49,237-39.
559

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.