Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 386 …More threatening were Rommel’s forces in North Africa, for the very existence of the air…
  • p. 387 …the route over which the Far East Air Force had received its thirty-five heavy bombers…
  • p. 551 …Formerly commander of the Far East Air Force in the Philip- * See above, pp. 396-97…
  • p. 561 …of an air force, depended upon a line of communications extending across the Indian and At…
  • p. 570 …the American air force would be used in the Bay of Bengal and Indian Ocean area…
  • p. 571 …Accordingly, on 24 May the order committing the Tenth Air Force to operations under RAF supervision…
  • p. 577 …involved in estab- lishing and operating an air force in Asia. The report of the Grady…
  • p. 630 …Policy for Disposition of US and British Air Forces.” l6 This memorandum greatly extended the scope…
  • p. 797 …MacArthur argued that now was a pro- pitious moment to rush forces from the Indian and…
  • p. 819 …5 8 - 6 7 Eighth Air Force, I, 326ff.; Achtung Indianer, a history of VIII FC…
  • p. 850 …See also CBI; Air Forces, Tenth AF. 336407 3537 356, 3803 395-96, q857 496 India…
T H E B A T T L E O F T H E A T L A N T I C
tude. Provision was made for transferring units, with the concurrence
of Operations Division, General Staff, to extracontinental areas on
a detached service basis. General Larson, as commanding general,
was responsible to the director of Military Requirements through
the director of Bombardment, but matters of policy, broad plans,
and the development of new weapons and equipment remained with
the Commanding General, AAF.84
Naval headquarters viewed the new command with but modified
approval. T o General Marshall’s proposal of 14 September, Admiral
King had replied that, although he concurred in general, he believed
“the preferable method” to be the allocation of air units to sea fron-
tiers, such allocation to change from time to time and from frontier
to frontier as the exigencies of the war dictated. H e would, he said,
continue to exercise control over Army planes through the com-
manders of the various sea frontiers. The final settlement involving
the activation of the Antisubmarine Command he appears to have
considered a W a r Department measure
As a matter of fact, that settlement settled very little, except for
the resultant improvement in the internal organization of the Army’s
own antisubmarine forces. It left undefined the nature and extent
of the operational control to be exercised by the Navy; and it left
untouched the problem of duplication, the parallel development of
two land-based air forces for the same task. Consequently, within this
undefined area there remained ample room for continued debate and
confusion, especially in view of the fact that differences also re-
mained concerning the most effective way of employing long-range,
land-based aircraft in the antisubmarine campaign.
T h e story as it must be left in the present volume is thus an in-
complete one. T h e submarine presented a still increasing menace, and
the debate concerning the best organization for and employment of
antisubmarine air forces continued well into the summer of 1943.+
The story of the Antisubmarine Command will be presented in Volume 11.
5 5 3

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.