Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 14 …with the commanding general, who in some instances moved in advance of promptings from Wash- ington…
  • p. 25 …EASTERNAND WESTERNAPPROACHESTO PANAMACANAL ALASKAAND THE ALEUTIANISLANDS PRINCIPALSEAAND AIR ROUTESAS DESIGNATEDBY WASH- ATLANTICFERRYINGAND TRANSPORTROUTESPRIORTO . . . . . . . . . . 297 30' 305…
  • p. 229 …the importance of the Far East Air Force in American strategy, the Air Staff in Wash…
  • p. 292 …Even so, there was in Wash- ington too little intelligence concerning the fluid tactical situation to…
  • p. 302 …The suggestion had been carried out in 1941 with the establishment of the U.S. Special…
  • p. 306 …work permanently with the British Joint Intelligence Committee in Wash- ington. The Combined Military Transportation Committee…
  • p. 389 …to delay the take-off was granted only after an appeal to Wash- ington.’O 3…
  • p. 442 …the time and attention of U.S. officers at Brisbane and of headquarters in Wash- ington…
  • p. 443 …Accidents delayed three planes en route, and one of the P-40’s was completely “washed…
  • p. 454 …promise of weakening the enemy. Attention already had been given in Wash- ington to establishment of…
  • p. 554 …In China, he found the procurement of necessary equipment, even be- fore the outbreak of war…
  • p. 636 …After further negotiations in Wash- ington, the Arnold-Towers-Portal agreement was adopted on z I…
  • p. 693 …Accordingly, Wash- ington was requested to send immediately 50 intelligence officers for training by the RAF…
  • p. 747 …before the Committee on Military Af- fairs, House of Representatives (Wash- 23. See, for instance, William…
  • p. 772 …The exact date of the arrival of air units is not known, as the latter source…
  • p. 799 …The road from Haiphong, Indo- China, to Yunnan was closed by the Vichy government in 1940…
  • p. 814 …Overseas (Ferrying), Air Min- istry, Memorandum on the Movement by Air of US. Forces to the…
T H E A R M Y A I R F O R C E S I N W O R L D W A R I 1
the Commanding General, AAF, in order to relieve it from the
control of any local, regional command. It would confine its opera-
tions to the American coastal waters, but would be free to send
detachments or task forces to other parts of the world. It would
work in conjunction with naval forces and under their operational
control “wherever this may be desirable,” leaving the convoying of
ships clearly a Navy responsibility. In short, he proposed to create a
unified force of land-based aircraft, built solidly around the radar-
equipped B-24, capable of waging offensive war against an elusive and
mobile enemy.*’
Formal action on the long-discussed command began in Sep-
tember. The final settlement was, however, less radical than that
favored by Dr. Bowles. It retained only those reforms suggested by
Army planners that did not specifically reduce the over-all authority
of the Navy. On 14 September, General Marshall wrote to Admiral
King: “Experience with the First Bomber Command in antisubmarine
operations since March indicates that the effective employment of air
forces against the submarine demands rapid communications, mo-
bility, and freedom from the restrictions inherent in command sys-
tems based upon area responsibility.” Accordingly, he proposed to
create the “First Antisubmarine Army Air Command,’’ which would
absorb those portions of the I Bomber Command engaged in anti-
submarine work. Control of the new unit would be centralized in the
War Department in order that it might be promptly dispatched to
zones of submarine activity wherever they might develop. It would
begin operation in Atlantic coastal waters, the Gulf, and the Carib-
bean; its expansion to other areas would depend upon the planes
available. Operations “naturally will be under the operational control
of the sea frontier concerned.” The closest co-operation with the
Navy, especially in the transmission of intelligence which could only
be compiled through naval sources, would be essential to the proper
functioning of this command. Provision would therefore have to be
made for liaison between “our immediate headquarters.” 83
On 2 2 September, General McNarney instructed General Arnold
to organize the new command, using I Bomber Command as cadre.
It was activated on 15 October 1942, under the designation, Army
Air Forces Antisubmarine Command. SubseqGent orders clarified its
mission and- command status. It was to attack hostile submarines
“wherever they may be operating,” which gave it considerable lati-
5 5 2

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.