Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 303 …of Naval Opera- tions; Adm. Ernest J. King, Commander in Chief, U.S. Fleet; Gen. George…
  • p. 316 …So far as the Navy is concerned, Admiral King, as you know, is not only Chief…
  • p. 493 …Admiral King believed that the mines offered a tempting bait to the Japanese who were currently…
  • p. 526 …Hence Admiral King placed a bid for suffi- 461
  • p. 527 …t this stage of the war Admiral King had accepted the belief that his carrier planes…
  • p. 538 …plan by 2 9 June, when Admiral King submitted to the Joint Chiefs a proposal that…
  • p. 607 …type * O n 5 March 1942, Admiral King wrote to General Arnold as follows: “The experience…
  • p. 608 …s.’l A formal request by Admiral King to the Chief of the Army Air Forces…
  • p. 609 …In a letter of 9 March 1942 to Admiral King, he proposed “the estab- lishment of…
  • p. 614 …In June, Admiral King expressed the official Navy position on this point with the utmost clarity…
  • p. 615 …In a memorandum to Admiral King, General McNarney, Deputy Chief of Staff, on 26 May outlined…
  • p. 616 …viewed as a temporary deta~hment.?~ Admiral King’s reaction to these cautious proposals was expressed…
  • p. 618 …the same words as used by Admiral King a month earlier: the answer to the antisubmarine…
  • p. 621 …On 14 September, General Marshall wrote to Admiral King: “Experience with the First Bomber Command in…
  • p. 622 …T o General Marshall’s proposal of 14 September, Admiral King had replied that, although he…
  • p. 641 …54 A week later General Marshall, Admiral King, Harry Hopkins, and a small staff flew to…
  • p. 645 …that scheduled to operate from the United King- dom. Dry topic or no, organization must figure…
  • p. 684 …the principal air task in the United King- dom had long been conceived as strategic bombardment…
  • p. 707 …establishment of base depots in the United King- dom became the basis of action in January…
  • p. 724 …Implicit in all of the arrangements being made in the United King- dom was the belief…
  • p. 788 …Force, Pt. I ; Fleet Adm. Ernest J. King, First Official Report to the Secretary of the…
  • p. 793 …Memo for Adm, King from C/S, 17 Mar. 1 % ~ . 34. JPS 2I/j/D, 7…
  • p. 795 …4 Aug. 1942. 108. Zbid. 109. Adm. King’s Report on Battle of Midway, incl. in…
  • p. 797 …306, 29 June 1942; memos for Adm. King from Mar- shall, 26 June 1942, and for…
  • p. 802 …1942; CM-IN-0629, Chung- king to AGWAR, # # z , 3 Apr. 1942; memo for Gen. Arnold…
  • p. 805 …Ltr., Arnold to King, 2 5 Feb. 1942. certain evidence from all Allied and enemy sources…
  • p. 806 …Memo for King from McNarney, 26 May 1942. 7 1 . Ltr., King to Marshall, 10 June…
  • p. 807 …Ltr., Marshall to King, 14 Sept. 1942, TAB XIVA, in Bowles report; memo for C G…
  • p. 808 …to notes from Mar- shall and Adm. King). 3 2 . A I c m o for…
  • p. 814 …Forces to the United King- dom, App. A, 19 Aug. 1942. 50. Ltr., Col. H.L…
  • p. 851 …C.E., 48-50 Killin, Pfc, 219 Kilner Board, 1 2 0 Kimbolton, 63 I King…
  • p. 854 …in Chief, 515, 5 2 2 , 544. (see also King); controversy over air power vs. battleship…
T H E B A T T L E O F T H E A T L A N T I C
especially considering that it spent only a fraction of its time on
combat patrol. But the important contribution of SADU was made,
as intended, in the application of scientific and technological resources
to antisubmarine warfare.” It kept close contact with the National
Defense Research Council and kept in touch with radar experimenta-
tion at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, by agencies of
the U.S. Navy, and under the direction of other organizations both
public and private. At the same time, it initiated projects peculiar to
its own mission and by the end of the year its commanding officer,
Col. W.C. Dolan, would be able to report on some fifty-eight
pro jecmS1
Bur it was one thing to develop the weapons and tactics and quite
another to use them effectively. That demanded, in Dr. Bowles’
opinion, a correspondingly fresh organization constructed on prin-
ciples of physical mobility and unity of purpose. He preferred not
to raise the question of over-all unity of command. Rather, he pro-
posed to increase the effectiveness of the antisubmarine organization
within the Army itself, by which he meant the organization of all
land-based aviation connected with the antisubmarine program. This,
of course, involved the jurisdiction of the Navy, for that service,
having been successful in its attempt to secure land-based bombers,
was preparing to build up a land-based air arm of its 0wn.t This
tendency to develop two separate air forces, one in the Army and
one in the Navy, for the same task, Dr. Bowles recognized as a
fundamental weakness in the current program, and in doing so he
pointed to the issue on which the future of AAF participation in that
program depended, an issue resolved a year later only by the com-
plete withdrawal of the AAF from the antisubmarine effort.
He recommended, therefore, that an “Air Anti-Submarine Force”
be organized under the command of a general officer who would
control the entire land-based air component of the American anti-
submarine forces, including all land-based aircraft employed by the
Navy for the purpose. Like SADU, this force would be placed under
For a discussion of some of the technical innovations in antisubmarine warfare
resulting from this and other research programs, see Volume I1 of this history.
t Delivery of B - z ~ sto the Navy began in August. By the end of the year, de-
liveries had reached a total of 5 2 , and by I July 1943 had totaled 209, which figure was
slightly above that requested in February 1942 (see above, p. 539.) Total deliveries
for 1 9 4 3 were 308; for 1944, the total was 604. At the end of that year the cumulative
total of B-24 deliveries had reached the figure of 964. (Figures supplied by Office of
Statistical Control.)
5 5 ’

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.