Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 258 …order to achieve this end we should cooperate with Japan fully un- quote.” Then: “ I 3…
  • p. 345 …seater aircraft operated by inexperienced personnel in cooperation with antiaircraft search- lights.” la‘ Many important objectives…
  • p. 425 …with brilliant judgment who must rely on cooperation,” * the ARCADIA conference of the British and American…
  • p. 566 …joined at Dinjan by Col. Merian C. Cooper. The task confronting them, to say the le…
  • p. 596 …There had even been talk of “mutual cooperation” rather than “unity of command.” Some firm decision…
  • p. 629 …the British Isles, to “operate independently in cooperation with the British Bomber Command.” l o Detailed…
  • p. 679 …the fullest agreement with the methods of cooperation which you propose and supremely confident that, at…
  • p. 793 …1942. 36. Ibid. 37. Col. Merian C. Cooper, Briefing 7'8 Officer, First Special Aviation Project…
  • p. 802 …Mar. 1943; talk by Col. M.C. Cooper in Gen. Johnson's Staff Meeting, 2 3…
  • p. 846 …5 5 2 Coolidge, President, 25, 28 Cooper, Col. M.C., 499 Coral Sea. Battle of…
T H E B A T T L E O F T H E A T L A N T I C
especially considering that it spent only a fraction of its time on
combat patrol. But the important contribution of SADU was made,
as intended, in the application of scientific and technological resources
to antisubmarine warfare.” It kept close contact with the National
Defense Research Council and kept in touch with radar experimenta-
tion at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, by agencies of
the U.S. Navy, and under the direction of other organizations both
public and private. At the same time, it initiated projects peculiar to
its own mission and by the end of the year its commanding officer,
Col. W.C. Dolan, would be able to report on some fifty-eight
pro jecmS1
Bur it was one thing to develop the weapons and tactics and quite
another to use them effectively. That demanded, in Dr. Bowles’
opinion, a correspondingly fresh organization constructed on prin-
ciples of physical mobility and unity of purpose. He preferred not
to raise the question of over-all unity of command. Rather, he pro-
posed to increase the effectiveness of the antisubmarine organization
within the Army itself, by which he meant the organization of all
land-based aviation connected with the antisubmarine program. This,
of course, involved the jurisdiction of the Navy, for that service,
having been successful in its attempt to secure land-based bombers,
was preparing to build up a land-based air arm of its 0wn.t This
tendency to develop two separate air forces, one in the Army and
one in the Navy, for the same task, Dr. Bowles recognized as a
fundamental weakness in the current program, and in doing so he
pointed to the issue on which the future of AAF participation in that
program depended, an issue resolved a year later only by the com-
plete withdrawal of the AAF from the antisubmarine effort.
He recommended, therefore, that an “Air Anti-Submarine Force”
be organized under the command of a general officer who would
control the entire land-based air component of the American anti-
submarine forces, including all land-based aircraft employed by the
Navy for the purpose. Like SADU, this force would be placed under
For a discussion of some of the technical innovations in antisubmarine warfare
resulting from this and other research programs, see Volume I1 of this history.
t Delivery of B - z ~ sto the Navy began in August. By the end of the year, de-
liveries had reached a total of 5 2 , and by I July 1943 had totaled 209, which figure was
slightly above that requested in February 1942 (see above, p. 539.) Total deliveries
for 1 9 4 3 were 308; for 1944, the total was 604. At the end of that year the cumulative
total of B-24 deliveries had reached the figure of 964. (Figures supplied by Office of
Statistical Control.)
5 5 ’

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.