Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 2 THE UNIVERSITYOF CHICAGOPRESS, CHICAGO8 LONDON The University of Toronto Press, Toronto 5, Canada Copyright 1948 by…
  • p. 48 …An Associated Press dispatch of 10 October gave a contemporary judgment of the importance of this…
  • p. 55 …Air Service (Corps) found it difficult to press vigorously for reorgani- zation and, by default, leadership…
  • p. 56 …In 1919the W a r Department was pressing for a drastic revision of the military establishment…
  • p. 61 …It held that there was no danger of an air attack on the United States and…
  • p. 64 …GHQ Air Forcq a trial than to press for more radical measures, and Howell’s group…
  • p. 75 …Powerful air attacks resolutely pressed home could never be completely stopped, but their effects could best…
  • p. 98 …based air operations in defense of the United States and its overseas posses~ions.’~T w…
  • p. 99 …General Westover’s report concluded that “all Air Force units could be concentrated on either coast…
  • p. 130 …the Admiralty began to press for control of naval air units, while the army attempted to…
  • p. 149 …basic and advanced Responsibility for crew and unit train- ing was vested in the GHQ Air…
  • p. 164 …A m y air units in the Territory existed primarily for the defense of this and…
  • p. 176 …no military alliances were made which would commit the United States to war; the plans only…
  • p. 278 …There were also grounds for hoping that heavy bomber units now based on Darwin might increase…
  • p. 285 …From 1938 the United States had invoked sanctions against Japan in the form of moral em…
  • p. 287 …Over-all Strategy and lmmediate Deployment On 2 2 December, the press announced dramatically the arrival…
  • p. 289 …ground units sent in that direction were not destined for immediate combat. No major invasion of…
  • p. 323 …Seizure of bases in Canada or Mexico for later attacks on the United States. Capture of…
  • p. 366 …United state^,^ and the British them- selves were forced to withdraw some pilots from combat units…
  • p. 380 …Upon the request of the Ferrying Command, the State Depart- ment again pressed for an answer…
  • p. 397 …the summer and fall, first as the United States Middle East Air Force and later as…
  • p. 430 …Attempts had been made to replace these obsolete craft by purchase from the United States, but…
  • p. 440 …But as the Japanese pressed forward the Americans were given no opportunity to get set. The…
  • p. 463 …personnel that would be reassigned to infantry units whose rosters already included many representatives of the…
  • p. 552 …pines and more recently of American air units operating in the Netherlands East Indies, he was…
  • p. 560 …Moreover, examination proved that most of the basic equipment of the units, including badly needed trucks…
  • p. 563 …Grady arrived from the United States for a comprehensive survey of Indian resources with reference to…
  • p. 564 …TO C H I N A graphic units, and unfavorable atmospheric conditions combined to make high…
  • p. 607 …Thus the AAF units engaged in the anti-U-boat war became almost a t once…
  • p. 628 …Army air bombardment units would operate offensively in collaboration with the Royal Air Force, primarily against…
  • p. 658 …was to operate in the United Kingdom.14' All air units initially based there were to…
  • p. 683 …of the units of the infant Eighth until their departure for the United Kingdom several months…
  • p. 691 …The RAF proposed that American fighter units be integrated with its own under a plan eventually…
  • p. 748 …533.) By 1928he was (Patrick, United States in the Air, pp. 190-91.) 38. Charges of…
  • p. 770 …y.W D Press Release, 2 1 June 1941. 9 1 . AR 95-5, 3a. 92…
  • p. 857 …Presque Isle, 344, 347-49, 641, 644-45 Press comment: B-17, 662-63; danger of…
T H E A R M Y A I R F O R C E S I N W O R L D W A R I 1
aircrews was the search, the effort to locate an almost invisible object
in the vast stretches of the ocean. It often seemed like trying to find
the proverbial needle in a stack of hay, and as a matter of fact it
was possible for crews to spend hundreds of flying hours with barely
a sighting to show for the effort. It was, therefore, natural that radar
should become the greatest of all antisubmarine weapons. The Ger-
man submarines would not feel the full effect of this aid until 1943,
but its potentialities were initially explored during I 942.
As shipping losses mounted in the spring of that year, it had be-
come clear that to defeat the U-boat an expanded antisubmarine
force would not in itself be sufficient. Accordingly, on 3 0 May 1942,
General Arnold ordered his director of Technical Services to establish
the Sea-Search Attack Development Unit (SADU) with headquar-
ters at Langley Field. This organization was to concern itself primarily
with the development of tactics and techniques of antisubmarine war-
fare, making use of all special devices available or under develop-
ment. It was also to serve as an experimental group, testing and
demonstrating devices which might be submitted to it for considera-
tion, and as an agency for training crews in antisubmarine tactics. In
the course of this work of research, testing, and training, or in addi-
tion to it if need be, the unit was to participate directly in the de-
struction of submarines. SADU was further directed to establish
and maintain the closest possible liaison with “all other centers of
research and development relating to the elements, systems and tac-
tics” of antisubmarine ~ a r f a r e . ~ ’In order to free it from the en-
cumbrance of complicated command channels, the Commanding
General, AAF, assumed command of the new unit through his
director of Technical Services. Operationally, however, it came under
the control of I Bomber Command. It was activated on 8 June 1942.
In addition to Headquarters, 1st Sea-Search Attack Group, it was
assigned a tactical unit, the 2d Sea-Search Attack Squadron, which
eventually operated some ten ASV-equipped €3- I 8’s. In December
1942, the 3d Sea-Search Attack Squadron was activated in order to
test and modify the newly acquired B-24’s. On the tactical side,
valuable assistance was obtained from an experienced RAF crew
which flew two radar-equipped Liberators.80
The 1st Sea-Search Attack Group acquitted itself well in anti-
submarine operations. Owing to its superior equipment, it in fact
contributed somewhat more than its share of sightings and attacks,
5 5 0

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.