Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 303 …of Naval Opera- tions; Adm. Ernest J. King, Commander in Chief, U.S. Fleet; Gen. George…
  • p. 316 …So far as the Navy is concerned, Admiral King, as you know, is not only Chief…
  • p. 493 …Admiral King believed that the mines offered a tempting bait to the Japanese who were currently…
  • p. 526 …Hence Admiral King placed a bid for suffi- 461
  • p. 527 …t this stage of the war Admiral King had accepted the belief that his carrier planes…
  • p. 538 …plan by 2 9 June, when Admiral King submitted to the Joint Chiefs a proposal that…
  • p. 607 …type * O n 5 March 1942, Admiral King wrote to General Arnold as follows: “The experience…
  • p. 608 …s.’l A formal request by Admiral King to the Chief of the Army Air Forces…
  • p. 609 …In a letter of 9 March 1942 to Admiral King, he proposed “the estab- lishment of…
  • p. 614 …In June, Admiral King expressed the official Navy position on this point with the utmost clarity…
  • p. 615 …In a memorandum to Admiral King, General McNarney, Deputy Chief of Staff, on 26 May outlined…
  • p. 616 …viewed as a temporary deta~hment.?~ Admiral King’s reaction to these cautious proposals was expressed…
  • p. 618 …the same words as used by Admiral King a month earlier: the answer to the antisubmarine…
  • p. 621 …On 14 September, General Marshall wrote to Admiral King: “Experience with the First Bomber Command in…
  • p. 622 …T o General Marshall’s proposal of 14 September, Admiral King had replied that, although he…
  • p. 641 …54 A week later General Marshall, Admiral King, Harry Hopkins, and a small staff flew to…
  • p. 645 …that scheduled to operate from the United King- dom. Dry topic or no, organization must figure…
  • p. 684 …the principal air task in the United King- dom had long been conceived as strategic bombardment…
  • p. 707 …establishment of base depots in the United King- dom became the basis of action in January…
  • p. 724 …Implicit in all of the arrangements being made in the United King- dom was the belief…
  • p. 788 …Force, Pt. I ; Fleet Adm. Ernest J. King, First Official Report to the Secretary of the…
  • p. 793 …Memo for Adm, King from C/S, 17 Mar. 1 % ~ . 34. JPS 2I/j/D, 7…
  • p. 795 …4 Aug. 1942. 108. Zbid. 109. Adm. King’s Report on Battle of Midway, incl. in…
  • p. 797 …306, 29 June 1942; memos for Adm. King from Mar- shall, 26 June 1942, and for…
  • p. 802 …1942; CM-IN-0629, Chung- king to AGWAR, # # z , 3 Apr. 1942; memo for Gen. Arnold…
  • p. 805 …Ltr., Arnold to King, 2 5 Feb. 1942. certain evidence from all Allied and enemy sources…
  • p. 806 …Memo for King from McNarney, 26 May 1942. 7 1 . Ltr., King to Marshall, 10 June…
  • p. 807 …Ltr., Marshall to King, 14 Sept. 1942, TAB XIVA, in Bowles report; memo for C G…
  • p. 808 …to notes from Mar- shall and Adm. King). 3 2 . A I c m o for…
  • p. 814 …Forces to the United King- dom, App. A, 19 Aug. 1942. 50. Ltr., Col. H.L…
  • p. 851 …C.E., 48-50 Killin, Pfc, 219 Kilner Board, 1 2 0 Kimbolton, 63 I King…
  • p. 854 …in Chief, 515, 5 2 2 , 544. (see also King); controversy over air power vs. battleship…
T H E A R M Y A I R F O R C E S I N W O R L D W A R I 1
aircrews was the search, the effort to locate an almost invisible object
in the vast stretches of the ocean. It often seemed like trying to find
the proverbial needle in a stack of hay, and as a matter of fact it
was possible for crews to spend hundreds of flying hours with barely
a sighting to show for the effort. It was, therefore, natural that radar
should become the greatest of all antisubmarine weapons. The Ger-
man submarines would not feel the full effect of this aid until 1943,
but its potentialities were initially explored during I 942.
As shipping losses mounted in the spring of that year, it had be-
come clear that to defeat the U-boat an expanded antisubmarine
force would not in itself be sufficient. Accordingly, on 3 0 May 1942,
General Arnold ordered his director of Technical Services to establish
the Sea-Search Attack Development Unit (SADU) with headquar-
ters at Langley Field. This organization was to concern itself primarily
with the development of tactics and techniques of antisubmarine war-
fare, making use of all special devices available or under develop-
ment. It was also to serve as an experimental group, testing and
demonstrating devices which might be submitted to it for considera-
tion, and as an agency for training crews in antisubmarine tactics. In
the course of this work of research, testing, and training, or in addi-
tion to it if need be, the unit was to participate directly in the de-
struction of submarines. SADU was further directed to establish
and maintain the closest possible liaison with “all other centers of
research and development relating to the elements, systems and tac-
tics” of antisubmarine ~ a r f a r e . ~ ’In order to free it from the en-
cumbrance of complicated command channels, the Commanding
General, AAF, assumed command of the new unit through his
director of Technical Services. Operationally, however, it came under
the control of I Bomber Command. It was activated on 8 June 1942.
In addition to Headquarters, 1st Sea-Search Attack Group, it was
assigned a tactical unit, the 2d Sea-Search Attack Squadron, which
eventually operated some ten ASV-equipped €3- I 8’s. In December
1942, the 3d Sea-Search Attack Squadron was activated in order to
test and modify the newly acquired B-24’s. On the tactical side,
valuable assistance was obtained from an experienced RAF crew
which flew two radar-equipped Liberators.80
The 1st Sea-Search Attack Group acquitted itself well in anti-
submarine operations. Owing to its superior equipment, it in fact
contributed somewhat more than its share of sightings and attacks,
5 5 0

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.