Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 386 …More threatening were Rommel’s forces in North Africa, for the very existence of the air…
  • p. 387 …the route over which the Far East Air Force had received its thirty-five heavy bombers…
  • p. 551 …Formerly commander of the Far East Air Force in the Philip- * See above, pp. 396-97…
  • p. 561 …of an air force, depended upon a line of communications extending across the Indian and At…
  • p. 570 …the American air force would be used in the Bay of Bengal and Indian Ocean area…
  • p. 571 …Accordingly, on 24 May the order committing the Tenth Air Force to operations under RAF supervision…
  • p. 577 …involved in estab- lishing and operating an air force in Asia. The report of the Grady…
  • p. 630 …Policy for Disposition of US and British Air Forces.” l6 This memorandum greatly extended the scope…
  • p. 797 …MacArthur argued that now was a pro- pitious moment to rush forces from the Indian and…
  • p. 819 …5 8 - 6 7 Eighth Air Force, I, 326ff.; Achtung Indianer, a history of VIII FC…
  • p. 850 …See also CBI; Air Forces, Tenth AF. 336407 3537 356, 3803 395-96, q857 496 India…
T H E B A T T L E O F T H E A T L A N T I C
aircraft, he suggested that a single sea frontier command be estab-
lished, extending from Maine to Mexico and covering the Atlantic and
Gulf areas, with a naval officer in charge of it. The specialized anti-
submarine command then being developed by the Army Air Forces
would be placed under the operational control of that naval officer.
T o this proposal, Secretary of the Navy Frank Knox replied in much
the same words as used by Admiral King a month earlier: the answer
to the antisubmarine problem lay “in augmenting our forces rather
than in further changes in the system of command which now seems
to be working effectively.” 7 6 In reply, Secretary Stimson stated that
the W a r Department was planning to provide for antisubmarine
operations all reinforcements “that can be diverted from other tasks.”
Specifically, 1 7 5 ASV-equipped bombers were to be furnished I
Bomber Command, and it was felt that this force would be adequate
if freed from restrictions “which are inherent in inflexible command
systems based upon area responsibility.” * 7 7
It was along these lines, the employment of radar-equipped, land-
based bombers within a flexible system of command, that Dr. Ed-
ward L. Bowles, expert consultant to the Secretary of War, had been
working for some time. H e urged in August that the antisubmarine
campaign be revitalized by extending the use of scientific aids. Spe-
cifically, he urged that radar and related devices be developed with
all possible speed and that the possibilities in long-range, land-based
antisubmarine aviation be realized by the employment of radar-
equipped B-24’s in substantial numbers. This revitalized force should
then be used in a co-ordinated offensive calculated to destroy the
enemy, not simply to protect hipp ping.'^
The AAF, through the initiative of Dr. Bowles and certain air
officers, had already taken an important step in this direction. Hunt-
ing submarines had proved a highly specialized undertaking, unlike
anything else the AAF had encountered. T h e attack itself involved
a curious duel between plane and submarine, each capable of three-
dimensional maneuver within the limitations of its peculiar medium.
But the most frustrating aspect of antisubmarine warfare for the
* Secretary Knox replied that, since rhe existing system of sea frontier areas had
been designed for use in all operations which might have to be conducted in or
from them, whether antisubmarine or otherwise, it would be a more flexible arrange-
ment to allocate fighting units to the several sea frontier forces than to “freeze” them
in an organization (such as the proposed antisubmarine command) designed for only
one purpose. (Memo for Stimson from Knox, 14 Aug. 1942.)
549

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.