Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 14 …with the commanding general, who in some instances moved in advance of promptings from Wash- ington…
  • p. 25 …EASTERNAND WESTERNAPPROACHESTO PANAMACANAL ALASKAAND THE ALEUTIANISLANDS PRINCIPALSEAAND AIR ROUTESAS DESIGNATEDBY WASH- ATLANTICFERRYINGAND TRANSPORTROUTESPRIORTO . . . . . . . . . . 297 30' 305…
  • p. 229 …the importance of the Far East Air Force in American strategy, the Air Staff in Wash…
  • p. 292 …Even so, there was in Wash- ington too little intelligence concerning the fluid tactical situation to…
  • p. 302 …The suggestion had been carried out in 1941 with the establishment of the U.S. Special…
  • p. 306 …work permanently with the British Joint Intelligence Committee in Wash- ington. The Combined Military Transportation Committee…
  • p. 389 …to delay the take-off was granted only after an appeal to Wash- ington.’O 3…
  • p. 442 …the time and attention of U.S. officers at Brisbane and of headquarters in Wash- ington…
  • p. 443 …Accidents delayed three planes en route, and one of the P-40’s was completely “washed…
  • p. 454 …promise of weakening the enemy. Attention already had been given in Wash- ington to establishment of…
  • p. 554 …In China, he found the procurement of necessary equipment, even be- fore the outbreak of war…
  • p. 636 …After further negotiations in Wash- ington, the Arnold-Towers-Portal agreement was adopted on z I…
  • p. 693 …Accordingly, Wash- ington was requested to send immediately 50 intelligence officers for training by the RAF…
  • p. 747 …before the Committee on Military Af- fairs, House of Representatives (Wash- 23. See, for instance, William…
  • p. 772 …The exact date of the arrival of air units is not known, as the latter source…
  • p. 799 …The road from Haiphong, Indo- China, to Yunnan was closed by the Vichy government in 1940…
  • p. 814 …Overseas (Ferrying), Air Min- istry, Memorandum on the Movement by Air of US. Forces to the…
T H E A R M Y A I R F O R C E S I N W O R L D W A R I 1
down the antisubmarine aviation to regional commands fortunately
did not extend to the naval districts, for if the practice had been
followed there it would have vitiated the effectiveness of the air arm.
Mobility, on which this effectiveness was considered to depend, was
nevertheless seriously obstructed by the difficulty of moving aircraft
assigned to one sea frontier to meet sudden requirements in an
area under the jurisdiction of another.62 Although a function of
COMINCH, the antisubmarine campaign in the western Atlantic
remained in practice a decentralized effort, its flexibility, especially
in the deployment of land-based aircraft, and its integration of tactical
procedure seriously compromised by a rigid system of regional
A centralized command thus became the key to AAF thinking as
far as it concerned the participation of Army air units in the antisub-
marine war. That campaign needed other things, to be sure. It needed
better equipment, a better training program, a better communications
system. Above all, AAF observers felt it needed a truly mobile air
arm. But all of these requirements depended in one way or another
on the attainment of a more unified command. Opinion, however,
in AAF quarters was not quite unanimous as to the nature and extent
of this unified jurisdiction. Obviously the entire American anti-
submarine campaign, involving surface as well as air forces, would
profit by centralized control if any part thereof would. And, if oper-
ational control by the Navy were to continue, as seemed likely, then
it would be well for a single Navy commander, rather than several,
to exercise that control over AAF units. But many AAF observers,
apprehensive of the direction in which a unified naval command
would lead the air forces allocated to itl preferred to think in terms
of a unified command for antisubmarine aviation as a matter of
primary importance, assuming, no doubt, that such an air command
would be capable of answering the needs of the air arm even under
the over-all control of the Navy. Some felt that this command should
consist only of land-based units; others argued that it should also
include Navy and Marine heavier-than-air craft engaged in the anti-
submarine campaign. All agreed, however, that the successful partici-
pation of the AAF in the Battle of the Atlantic depended on the
creation of a separate command, comprising at least the AAF units,
responsible directly to Headquarters, AAF, and trained and equipped
for the sole purpose of hunting U-boat~.'~
54.4

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.