Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 173 …At the Roosevelt-Churchill conference at sea in mid-August, Generals Marshall and Arnold had made…
  • p. 226 …Air Service Command under Col. L.S. Churchill. Because of a shortage of experienced officers, only…
  • p. 282 …President Roosevelt and Prime Minister Churchill with their chiefs of staff, then meeting in Washington, had…
  • p. 287 …the arrival in Washington of Prime Minister Churchill, his chiefs of staff, and other high-ranking…
  • p. 290 …stipulated in ABC-I. A t Mr. Churchill’s request, U.S. troops were to relieve…
  • p. 302 …the U.S. forces, and by Mr. Churchill as British Prime Minister and Minister of Defense…
  • p. 303 …Field Marshal Sir John Dill representing Mr. Churchill as Minister of De- fense. Sir John Dill…
  • p. 304 …of such a personal representative of Mr. Churchill might make difficult the maintenance of normal military…
  • p. 425 …O n the same day, Prime Minister Churchill informed Gen. Sir Archibald Wavell of his selection…
  • p. 628 …Western Hemisphere. When the President and Mr. Churchill met with their military staffs in the ARCADIA…
  • p. 630 …strong support in a long cable from Churchill to Roosevelt, delivered on 5 March, in which…
  • p. 636 …first in a gen- eral meeting with Churchill, later among the airmen alone.34Arnold reviewed the…
  • p. 639 …Much had happened in the two months which had passed since Churchill had approved that plan…
  • p. 640 …Duncan, chief of staff for the Eighth Air Force, wrote from Washington to Spaatz that Churchill…
  • p. 641 …postponement was al- most tantamount to refusal. Churchill was back in London by the 27th. In…
  • p. 642 …then back in Washington, that Roosevelt and Churchill “believed” that T O R C H was…
  • p. 661 …Even during the Battle of Britain, Churchill could tell the House of Commons that “there seems…
  • p. 705 …4 1 . ~ ~The following month, Prime Minister Churchill in conference with Messrs. Harry Hopkins and Averell…
  • p. 810 …2 0 August 1940, in R.S. Churchill, ed., Into Battle (London, 1941),p. 2 5…
  • p. 811 …comp., Winston Churchill’s Secret Session Speeches (New York, 1946), p. 85. 161. Larner report, as…
  • p. 845 …L.S., 182 Churchill, Prime Minister Winston, 133, 1369 141, 232, 235-37, 2409 2431 252…
T H E A R M Y A I R F O R C E S I N W O R L D W A R I 1
down the antisubmarine aviation to regional commands fortunately
did not extend to the naval districts, for if the practice had been
followed there it would have vitiated the effectiveness of the air arm.
Mobility, on which this effectiveness was considered to depend, was
nevertheless seriously obstructed by the difficulty of moving aircraft
assigned to one sea frontier to meet sudden requirements in an
area under the jurisdiction of another.62 Although a function of
COMINCH, the antisubmarine campaign in the western Atlantic
remained in practice a decentralized effort, its flexibility, especially
in the deployment of land-based aircraft, and its integration of tactical
procedure seriously compromised by a rigid system of regional
A centralized command thus became the key to AAF thinking as
far as it concerned the participation of Army air units in the antisub-
marine war. That campaign needed other things, to be sure. It needed
better equipment, a better training program, a better communications
system. Above all, AAF observers felt it needed a truly mobile air
arm. But all of these requirements depended in one way or another
on the attainment of a more unified command. Opinion, however,
in AAF quarters was not quite unanimous as to the nature and extent
of this unified jurisdiction. Obviously the entire American anti-
submarine campaign, involving surface as well as air forces, would
profit by centralized control if any part thereof would. And, if oper-
ational control by the Navy were to continue, as seemed likely, then
it would be well for a single Navy commander, rather than several,
to exercise that control over AAF units. But many AAF observers,
apprehensive of the direction in which a unified naval command
would lead the air forces allocated to itl preferred to think in terms
of a unified command for antisubmarine aviation as a matter of
primary importance, assuming, no doubt, that such an air command
would be capable of answering the needs of the air arm even under
the over-all control of the Navy. Some felt that this command should
consist only of land-based units; others argued that it should also
include Navy and Marine heavier-than-air craft engaged in the anti-
submarine campaign. All agreed, however, that the successful partici-
pation of the AAF in the Battle of the Atlantic depended on the
creation of a separate command, comprising at least the AAF units,
responsible directly to Headquarters, AAF, and trained and equipped
for the sole purpose of hunting U-boat~.'~
54.4

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.