Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 303 …of Naval Opera- tions; Adm. Ernest J. King, Commander in Chief, U.S. Fleet; Gen. George…
  • p. 316 …So far as the Navy is concerned, Admiral King, as you know, is not only Chief…
  • p. 493 …Admiral King believed that the mines offered a tempting bait to the Japanese who were currently…
  • p. 526 …Hence Admiral King placed a bid for suffi- 461
  • p. 527 …t this stage of the war Admiral King had accepted the belief that his carrier planes…
  • p. 538 …plan by 2 9 June, when Admiral King submitted to the Joint Chiefs a proposal that…
  • p. 607 …type * O n 5 March 1942, Admiral King wrote to General Arnold as follows: “The experience…
  • p. 608 …s.’l A formal request by Admiral King to the Chief of the Army Air Forces…
  • p. 609 …In a letter of 9 March 1942 to Admiral King, he proposed “the estab- lishment of…
  • p. 614 …In June, Admiral King expressed the official Navy position on this point with the utmost clarity…
  • p. 615 …In a memorandum to Admiral King, General McNarney, Deputy Chief of Staff, on 26 May outlined…
  • p. 616 …viewed as a temporary deta~hment.?~ Admiral King’s reaction to these cautious proposals was expressed…
  • p. 618 …the same words as used by Admiral King a month earlier: the answer to the antisubmarine…
  • p. 621 …On 14 September, General Marshall wrote to Admiral King: “Experience with the First Bomber Command in…
  • p. 622 …T o General Marshall’s proposal of 14 September, Admiral King had replied that, although he…
  • p. 641 …54 A week later General Marshall, Admiral King, Harry Hopkins, and a small staff flew to…
  • p. 645 …that scheduled to operate from the United King- dom. Dry topic or no, organization must figure…
  • p. 684 …the principal air task in the United King- dom had long been conceived as strategic bombardment…
  • p. 707 …establishment of base depots in the United King- dom became the basis of action in January…
  • p. 724 …Implicit in all of the arrangements being made in the United King- dom was the belief…
  • p. 788 …Force, Pt. I ; Fleet Adm. Ernest J. King, First Official Report to the Secretary of the…
  • p. 793 …Memo for Adm, King from C/S, 17 Mar. 1 % ~ . 34. JPS 2I/j/D, 7…
  • p. 795 …4 Aug. 1942. 108. Zbid. 109. Adm. King’s Report on Battle of Midway, incl. in…
  • p. 797 …306, 29 June 1942; memos for Adm. King from Mar- shall, 26 June 1942, and for…
  • p. 802 …1942; CM-IN-0629, Chung- king to AGWAR, # # z , 3 Apr. 1942; memo for Gen. Arnold…
  • p. 805 …Ltr., Arnold to King, 2 5 Feb. 1942. certain evidence from all Allied and enemy sources…
  • p. 806 …Memo for King from McNarney, 26 May 1942. 7 1 . Ltr., King to Marshall, 10 June…
  • p. 807 …Ltr., Marshall to King, 14 Sept. 1942, TAB XIVA, in Bowles report; memo for C G…
  • p. 808 …to notes from Mar- shall and Adm. King). 3 2 . A I c m o for…
  • p. 814 …Forces to the United King- dom, App. A, 19 Aug. 1942. 50. Ltr., Col. H.L…
  • p. 851 …C.E., 48-50 Killin, Pfc, 219 Kilner Board, 1 2 0 Kimbolton, 63 I King…
  • p. 854 …in Chief, 515, 5 2 2 , 544. (see also King); controversy over air power vs. battleship…
T H E B A T T L E O F T H E A T L A N T I C
of a French aircraft carrier a t Martinique continued to lend an air of
immediacy to the threat which originally had determined this mission,
and it was doubtless for this reason that the Antilles Air Task Force
never evolved, as did I Bomber Command, into an organization shaped
for the primary purpose of antisubmarine warfare. Indeed, by the
fall of 1942 plans were under way for extending the activity of
I Bomber Command, in its as yet unofficial capacity as the AAF
antisubmarine force, to bases in the Caribbean; and in August, a few
B-18’s of its 40th Bombardment Squadron had been in fact sent on
detached service to the Puerto Rican and Trinidad areas. This ex-
periment in sending antisubmarine forces to outlying bases on a
detached service status proved administratively unsatisfactory, but
plans nevertheless continued to point toward I Bomber Command as
the organization that would be responsible for AAF specialized anti-
submarine activity wherever it might be undertaken:’
When on 1 5 October 1942 the I Bomber Command became the
Army Air Forces Antisubmarine Command with a materially ex-
panded mission, it was still a comparatively small organization and
one as yet inadequately trained and equipped for its task. From a
high point of 216 planes in July, a point reached just after the
submarine menace within the area of its operations had begun to
decline, the I Bomber Command had suffered a decrease in combat
strength until in October it reported only 148 aircraft. Of these,
twelve were B-17’s, fourteen B-I S’s, thirty-five B-zs’s, and three
B-24’s; the rest, a mixture of A-ZO’S,A-zg’s, and B-34’s, lacked suffi-
cient range for anything except strictly coastal patrol. Some twenty-
seven planes were a t this time equipped with radar; this number, too,
represented a marked decline since July. But the command had made
great progress toward becoming an effective antisubmarine striking
force. It had accumulated the many benefits of a wide and varied
experience, and its personnel stood ready to provide effective leader-
ship in the definition of tactical doctrine, the shaping of training,
and the adaptation of equipment to the peculiar requirements of a
larger mission. It had come to be recognized that the long-range B-24
was especially well suited to the demands of antisubmarine warfare,
and in September the command had received the first of the planes
that would thereafter become the principal reliance in the AAF’s
antisubmarine effort.“O
537

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.