Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 303 …of Naval Opera- tions; Adm. Ernest J. King, Commander in Chief, U.S. Fleet; Gen. George…
  • p. 316 …So far as the Navy is concerned, Admiral King, as you know, is not only Chief…
  • p. 493 …Admiral King believed that the mines offered a tempting bait to the Japanese who were currently…
  • p. 526 …Hence Admiral King placed a bid for suffi- 461
  • p. 527 …t this stage of the war Admiral King had accepted the belief that his carrier planes…
  • p. 538 …plan by 2 9 June, when Admiral King submitted to the Joint Chiefs a proposal that…
  • p. 607 …type * O n 5 March 1942, Admiral King wrote to General Arnold as follows: “The experience…
  • p. 608 …s.’l A formal request by Admiral King to the Chief of the Army Air Forces…
  • p. 609 …In a letter of 9 March 1942 to Admiral King, he proposed “the estab- lishment of…
  • p. 614 …In June, Admiral King expressed the official Navy position on this point with the utmost clarity…
  • p. 615 …In a memorandum to Admiral King, General McNarney, Deputy Chief of Staff, on 26 May outlined…
  • p. 616 …viewed as a temporary deta~hment.?~ Admiral King’s reaction to these cautious proposals was expressed…
  • p. 618 …the same words as used by Admiral King a month earlier: the answer to the antisubmarine…
  • p. 621 …On 14 September, General Marshall wrote to Admiral King: “Experience with the First Bomber Command in…
  • p. 622 …T o General Marshall’s proposal of 14 September, Admiral King had replied that, although he…
  • p. 641 …54 A week later General Marshall, Admiral King, Harry Hopkins, and a small staff flew to…
  • p. 645 …that scheduled to operate from the United King- dom. Dry topic or no, organization must figure…
  • p. 684 …the principal air task in the United King- dom had long been conceived as strategic bombardment…
  • p. 707 …establishment of base depots in the United King- dom became the basis of action in January…
  • p. 724 …Implicit in all of the arrangements being made in the United King- dom was the belief…
  • p. 788 …Force, Pt. I ; Fleet Adm. Ernest J. King, First Official Report to the Secretary of the…
  • p. 793 …Memo for Adm, King from C/S, 17 Mar. 1 % ~ . 34. JPS 2I/j/D, 7…
  • p. 795 …4 Aug. 1942. 108. Zbid. 109. Adm. King’s Report on Battle of Midway, incl. in…
  • p. 797 …306, 29 June 1942; memos for Adm. King from Mar- shall, 26 June 1942, and for…
  • p. 802 …1942; CM-IN-0629, Chung- king to AGWAR, # # z , 3 Apr. 1942; memo for Gen. Arnold…
  • p. 805 …Ltr., Arnold to King, 2 5 Feb. 1942. certain evidence from all Allied and enemy sources…
  • p. 806 …Memo for King from McNarney, 26 May 1942. 7 1 . Ltr., King to Marshall, 10 June…
  • p. 807 …Ltr., Marshall to King, 14 Sept. 1942, TAB XIVA, in Bowles report; memo for C G…
  • p. 808 …to notes from Mar- shall and Adm. King). 3 2 . A I c m o for…
  • p. 814 …Forces to the United King- dom, App. A, 19 Aug. 1942. 50. Ltr., Col. H.L…
  • p. 851 …C.E., 48-50 Killin, Pfc, 219 Kilner Board, 1 2 0 Kimbolton, 63 I King…
  • p. 854 …in Chief, 515, 5 2 2 , 544. (see also King); controversy over air power vs. battleship…
T H E A R M Y A I R F O R C E S I N W O R L D W A R I 1
important tactical conclusions. For example, they determined that
the probability of a successful attack on a long-submerged submarine
was extremely small. Conversely, only U-boats which could be at-
tacked while on the surface or within, a t most, thirty seconds after
submerging offered profitable targets, a fact which encouraged the
use of depth bombs set for detonation at relatively shallow depths,
say twenty-five to thirty feet. British experience also indicated that,
to insure a successful attack, one of the bombs dropped must explode
within little more than a dozen feet of the U-boat’s hull3’
Such items of tactical information the American units welcomed
and found very valuable. But much of the job of hunting U-boats had
necessarily to be learned by doing. Consequently, during these early
months of the campaign, each AAF unit operated for tactical pur-
poses in large part as its commander saw fit; and the data on each
attack were eagerly studied in I Bomber Command headquarters with
a view to the evolution of a tactical doctrine of its own. Many of
the lessons were elementary. It was found to be well, for instance,
not to pay too much attention to the appearance of oil slicks on the
surface of the water, as they did not indicate necessarily the presence
of a submarine. From the air, too, it was easy to mistake the wake
left by the fin of a shark for that produced by the periscope of a sub-
marine, a fact from which the larger forms of marine life may on more
than one occasion have
Many other lessons involved increasingly subtle understanding of
the conditions under which attacks might be undertaken with the
greatest chance of success-the use, for example, of cloud cover as a
means of concealment and surprise in daytime attacks, and an ap-
proach toward the target down the moon path by night. If a sub-
marine submerged before an attack could be delivered, it was found
to be advisable for the attacking plane to use “baiting” tactics, which
involved leaving the area for a good interval and then returning to
it in the hope that the enemy might in the meantime have surfaced
and be thus open to another attack. In many other respects the learn-
ing process was far from complete by July of 1942. Opinion still dif-
fered as to the advisability of dropping an entire bomb load on the
initial contact; and it was still debated whether it was better to attack
the U-boat from the side or along its longitudinal axis. But the data
was beginning to arrive in quantity sufficient soon to remove such
questions from the realm of opinion. Finally, the development of
5 3 2

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.