Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 303 …of Naval Opera- tions; Adm. Ernest J. King, Commander in Chief, U.S. Fleet; Gen. George…
  • p. 316 …So far as the Navy is concerned, Admiral King, as you know, is not only Chief…
  • p. 493 …Admiral King believed that the mines offered a tempting bait to the Japanese who were currently…
  • p. 526 …Hence Admiral King placed a bid for suffi- 461
  • p. 527 …t this stage of the war Admiral King had accepted the belief that his carrier planes…
  • p. 538 …plan by 2 9 June, when Admiral King submitted to the Joint Chiefs a proposal that…
  • p. 607 …type * O n 5 March 1942, Admiral King wrote to General Arnold as follows: “The experience…
  • p. 608 …s.’l A formal request by Admiral King to the Chief of the Army Air Forces…
  • p. 609 …In a letter of 9 March 1942 to Admiral King, he proposed “the estab- lishment of…
  • p. 614 …In June, Admiral King expressed the official Navy position on this point with the utmost clarity…
  • p. 615 …In a memorandum to Admiral King, General McNarney, Deputy Chief of Staff, on 26 May outlined…
  • p. 616 …viewed as a temporary deta~hment.?~ Admiral King’s reaction to these cautious proposals was expressed…
  • p. 618 …the same words as used by Admiral King a month earlier: the answer to the antisubmarine…
  • p. 621 …On 14 September, General Marshall wrote to Admiral King: “Experience with the First Bomber Command in…
  • p. 622 …T o General Marshall’s proposal of 14 September, Admiral King had replied that, although he…
  • p. 641 …54 A week later General Marshall, Admiral King, Harry Hopkins, and a small staff flew to…
  • p. 645 …that scheduled to operate from the United King- dom. Dry topic or no, organization must figure…
  • p. 684 …the principal air task in the United King- dom had long been conceived as strategic bombardment…
  • p. 707 …establishment of base depots in the United King- dom became the basis of action in January…
  • p. 724 …Implicit in all of the arrangements being made in the United King- dom was the belief…
  • p. 788 …Force, Pt. I ; Fleet Adm. Ernest J. King, First Official Report to the Secretary of the…
  • p. 793 …Memo for Adm, King from C/S, 17 Mar. 1 % ~ . 34. JPS 2I/j/D, 7…
  • p. 795 …4 Aug. 1942. 108. Zbid. 109. Adm. King’s Report on Battle of Midway, incl. in…
  • p. 797 …306, 29 June 1942; memos for Adm. King from Mar- shall, 26 June 1942, and for…
  • p. 802 …1942; CM-IN-0629, Chung- king to AGWAR, # # z , 3 Apr. 1942; memo for Gen. Arnold…
  • p. 805 …Ltr., Arnold to King, 2 5 Feb. 1942. certain evidence from all Allied and enemy sources…
  • p. 806 …Memo for King from McNarney, 26 May 1942. 7 1 . Ltr., King to Marshall, 10 June…
  • p. 807 …Ltr., Marshall to King, 14 Sept. 1942, TAB XIVA, in Bowles report; memo for C G…
  • p. 808 …to notes from Mar- shall and Adm. King). 3 2 . A I c m o for…
  • p. 814 …Forces to the United King- dom, App. A, 19 Aug. 1942. 50. Ltr., Col. H.L…
  • p. 851 …C.E., 48-50 Killin, Pfc, 219 Kilner Board, 1 2 0 Kimbolton, 63 I King…
  • p. 854 …in Chief, 515, 5 2 2 , 544. (see also King); controversy over air power vs. battleship…
T H E B A T T L R O F T H E A T L A N T I C
MacDill Field, Florida, at the disposal of the Gulf Task Force. A plan
embodying these recommendations was put into effect on I July 1942.
In addition, two observation groups (the 128th and the 124th) were
attached to the Gulf Task Force in early July primarily for the pur-
pose of forming and training Civil Air Patrol groups in the Gulf area.
Meanwhile, arrangements had been made to establish a joint opera-
tions center a t Miami, to be built on the general pattern being evolved
for similar purposes in New York City. The project was initiated in
June. By September, the I Bomber Command was operating from ten
bases scattered along the coast line from Westover Field, Massa-
chusetts, to Galveston, Texas."
During April, May, and June of 1942, I Bomber Command planes,
and those serving under the operational direction of that command,
attacked enemy submarines at a steadily increasing rate. Although
hours flown during this period showed a slight decrease in monthly
total from the record activity registered in March, the number of
attacks for the three-month period turned out to be almost seven
times greater than for the first three months of the year. And of the
fifty-four attacks recorded, a t least seven appear to have resulted in
some damage to the enemy craft. As yet, however, no attack had
resulted in the destruction of a U-boat. Nonetheless, the total harass-
ing effect seems to have been considerable, as is suggested by the
enemy's tendency to shift the attack to the areas less effectively
covered by air patr01.~'
More promising was the tactical experience gained in the course of
those first six months of continuous operations. It was necessarily a
period of training and experimentation, and the later effectiveness of
the Army antisubmarine campaign depended to a large extent on the
experience gained from January to July of 1942. Fortunately, both
Army and Navy antisubmarine forces were able to draw largely on
the experience of the British for their initial stock of tactical data,
and they made extensive use of their opportunity. Of particular aid
to the AAF units was the help given by two liaison officers sent to the
United States in February.'l
Study of British intelligence data indicated that, prior to August
1941, British aircraft had executed 2 7 0 attacks on U-boats, as a result
of which two U-boats had been definitely sunk and five more prob-
ably sunk. On the basis of this experience, not wholly encouraging
in the sum total, British analysts had been able to arrive at certain very
5 3 '

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is above. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.