Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 173 …At the Roosevelt-Churchill conference at sea in mid-August, Generals Marshall and Arnold had made…
  • p. 226 …Air Service Command under Col. L.S. Churchill. Because of a shortage of experienced officers, only…
  • p. 282 …President Roosevelt and Prime Minister Churchill with their chiefs of staff, then meeting in Washington, had…
  • p. 287 …the arrival in Washington of Prime Minister Churchill, his chiefs of staff, and other high-ranking…
  • p. 290 …stipulated in ABC-I. A t Mr. Churchill’s request, U.S. troops were to relieve…
  • p. 302 …the U.S. forces, and by Mr. Churchill as British Prime Minister and Minister of Defense…
  • p. 303 …Field Marshal Sir John Dill representing Mr. Churchill as Minister of De- fense. Sir John Dill…
  • p. 304 …of such a personal representative of Mr. Churchill might make difficult the maintenance of normal military…
  • p. 425 …O n the same day, Prime Minister Churchill informed Gen. Sir Archibald Wavell of his selection…
  • p. 628 …Western Hemisphere. When the President and Mr. Churchill met with their military staffs in the ARCADIA…
  • p. 630 …strong support in a long cable from Churchill to Roosevelt, delivered on 5 March, in which…
  • p. 636 …first in a gen- eral meeting with Churchill, later among the airmen alone.34Arnold reviewed the…
  • p. 639 …Much had happened in the two months which had passed since Churchill had approved that plan…
  • p. 640 …Duncan, chief of staff for the Eighth Air Force, wrote from Washington to Spaatz that Churchill…
  • p. 641 …postponement was al- most tantamount to refusal. Churchill was back in London by the 27th. In…
  • p. 642 …then back in Washington, that Roosevelt and Churchill “believed” that T O R C H was…
  • p. 661 …Even during the Battle of Britain, Churchill could tell the House of Commons that “there seems…
  • p. 705 …4 1 . ~ ~The following month, Prime Minister Churchill in conference with Messrs. Harry Hopkins and Averell…
  • p. 810 …2 0 August 1940, in R.S. Churchill, ed., Into Battle (London, 1941),p. 2 5…
  • p. 811 …comp., Winston Churchill’s Secret Session Speeches (New York, 1946), p. 85. 161. Larner report, as…
  • p. 845 …L.S., 182 Churchill, Prime Minister Winston, 133, 1369 141, 232, 235-37, 2409 2431 252…
T H E B A T T L R O F T H E A T L A N T I C
MacDill Field, Florida, at the disposal of the Gulf Task Force. A plan
embodying these recommendations was put into effect on I July 1942.
In addition, two observation groups (the 128th and the 124th) were
attached to the Gulf Task Force in early July primarily for the pur-
pose of forming and training Civil Air Patrol groups in the Gulf area.
Meanwhile, arrangements had been made to establish a joint opera-
tions center a t Miami, to be built on the general pattern being evolved
for similar purposes in New York City. The project was initiated in
June. By September, the I Bomber Command was operating from ten
bases scattered along the coast line from Westover Field, Massa-
chusetts, to Galveston, Texas."
During April, May, and June of 1942, I Bomber Command planes,
and those serving under the operational direction of that command,
attacked enemy submarines at a steadily increasing rate. Although
hours flown during this period showed a slight decrease in monthly
total from the record activity registered in March, the number of
attacks for the three-month period turned out to be almost seven
times greater than for the first three months of the year. And of the
fifty-four attacks recorded, a t least seven appear to have resulted in
some damage to the enemy craft. As yet, however, no attack had
resulted in the destruction of a U-boat. Nonetheless, the total harass-
ing effect seems to have been considerable, as is suggested by the
enemy's tendency to shift the attack to the areas less effectively
covered by air patr01.~'
More promising was the tactical experience gained in the course of
those first six months of continuous operations. It was necessarily a
period of training and experimentation, and the later effectiveness of
the Army antisubmarine campaign depended to a large extent on the
experience gained from January to July of 1942. Fortunately, both
Army and Navy antisubmarine forces were able to draw largely on
the experience of the British for their initial stock of tactical data,
and they made extensive use of their opportunity. Of particular aid
to the AAF units was the help given by two liaison officers sent to the
United States in February.'l
Study of British intelligence data indicated that, prior to August
1941, British aircraft had executed 2 7 0 attacks on U-boats, as a result
of which two U-boats had been definitely sunk and five more prob-
ably sunk. On the basis of this experience, not wholly encouraging
in the sum total, British analysts had been able to arrive at certain very
5 3 '

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.