Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 303 …of Naval Opera- tions; Adm. Ernest J. King, Commander in Chief, U.S. Fleet; Gen. George…
  • p. 316 …So far as the Navy is concerned, Admiral King, as you know, is not only Chief…
  • p. 493 …Admiral King believed that the mines offered a tempting bait to the Japanese who were currently…
  • p. 526 …Hence Admiral King placed a bid for suffi- 461
  • p. 527 …t this stage of the war Admiral King had accepted the belief that his carrier planes…
  • p. 538 …plan by 2 9 June, when Admiral King submitted to the Joint Chiefs a proposal that…
  • p. 607 …type * O n 5 March 1942, Admiral King wrote to General Arnold as follows: “The experience…
  • p. 608 …s.’l A formal request by Admiral King to the Chief of the Army Air Forces…
  • p. 609 …In a letter of 9 March 1942 to Admiral King, he proposed “the estab- lishment of…
  • p. 614 …In June, Admiral King expressed the official Navy position on this point with the utmost clarity…
  • p. 615 …In a memorandum to Admiral King, General McNarney, Deputy Chief of Staff, on 26 May outlined…
  • p. 616 …viewed as a temporary deta~hment.?~ Admiral King’s reaction to these cautious proposals was expressed…
  • p. 618 …the same words as used by Admiral King a month earlier: the answer to the antisubmarine…
  • p. 621 …On 14 September, General Marshall wrote to Admiral King: “Experience with the First Bomber Command in…
  • p. 622 …T o General Marshall’s proposal of 14 September, Admiral King had replied that, although he…
  • p. 641 …54 A week later General Marshall, Admiral King, Harry Hopkins, and a small staff flew to…
  • p. 645 …that scheduled to operate from the United King- dom. Dry topic or no, organization must figure…
  • p. 684 …the principal air task in the United King- dom had long been conceived as strategic bombardment…
  • p. 707 …establishment of base depots in the United King- dom became the basis of action in January…
  • p. 724 …Implicit in all of the arrangements being made in the United King- dom was the belief…
  • p. 788 …Force, Pt. I ; Fleet Adm. Ernest J. King, First Official Report to the Secretary of the…
  • p. 793 …Memo for Adm, King from C/S, 17 Mar. 1 % ~ . 34. JPS 2I/j/D, 7…
  • p. 795 …4 Aug. 1942. 108. Zbid. 109. Adm. King’s Report on Battle of Midway, incl. in…
  • p. 797 …306, 29 June 1942; memos for Adm. King from Mar- shall, 26 June 1942, and for…
  • p. 802 …1942; CM-IN-0629, Chung- king to AGWAR, # # z , 3 Apr. 1942; memo for Gen. Arnold…
  • p. 805 …Ltr., Arnold to King, 2 5 Feb. 1942. certain evidence from all Allied and enemy sources…
  • p. 806 …Memo for King from McNarney, 26 May 1942. 7 1 . Ltr., King to Marshall, 10 June…
  • p. 807 …Ltr., Marshall to King, 14 Sept. 1942, TAB XIVA, in Bowles report; memo for C G…
  • p. 808 …to notes from Mar- shall and Adm. King). 3 2 . A I c m o for…
  • p. 814 …Forces to the United King- dom, App. A, 19 Aug. 1942. 50. Ltr., Col. H.L…
  • p. 851 …C.E., 48-50 Killin, Pfc, 219 Kilner Board, 1 2 0 Kimbolton, 63 I King…
  • p. 854 …in Chief, 515, 5 2 2 , 544. (see also King); controversy over air power vs. battleship…
T H E A R M Y A I R F O R C E S I N W O R L D W A R I 1
operating bases south of Langley Field and for increased mobility on
the part of the units under his command in order that advantage might
be taken of a wider operating area.2s
Any doubts regarding the necessity for extending the antisubma-
rine activity of the AAF and for increasing the mobility of its units
were dispelled during the next two months by the Germans them-
selves who began rapidly to shift the emphasis of their attack toward
the Gulf of Mexico and Caribbean areas. This move on the part of
the enemy found American defenses again unprepared, and the shift
in operating area was accompanied by a sharp rise in the number of
merchant ships lost in the coastal waters. In April, twenty-three ships
were lost in the Eastern Sea Frontier, as compared to two in the Gulf
Sea Frontier. In May, the number lost to submarine action in the
former dropped to five, while the corresponding figure for the latter
rose to forty-one. This total of forty-six merchant vessels lost during
the month represents the high point in the U-boat offensive in the
two home sea frontiers.2T
In answer to an urgent request from the commander of the Gulf
Sea Frontier for air reinforcement, a detachment of twenty B-18’s
was sent south; and shortly thereafter, on 26 May, Maj. Gen. Follett
Bradley, commanding general of the First Air Force, set up the Gulf
Task Force of the I Bomber Command. This new organization was
composed initially of the detachment of B-r 8’s mentioned above, to-
gether with two observation squadrons (the 97th and 66th) and all
units of the Civil Air Patrol then engaged in antisubmarine patrol in
the Gulf Sea Frontier. Its headquarters, temporarily located at
Charleston, South Carolina, was ultimately established a t Miami,
Florida. The command relationship between the Gulf Task Force and
the Gulf Sea Frontier was similar to that which existed between the
I Bomber Command and the Eastern Sea Frontier.28
It soon became evident that the need for Army air patrol in the
Gulf area exceeded the ability of this small task force to meet it.
Accordingly, a few days after it had been established, General Arnold
requested the Third Air Force to use certain of its training units for
antisubmarine patrol in the course of their regular overwater training
missions, such flights to be directed by the Gulf Task Force. For its
part, Third Air Force, various units of which had maintained sporadic
patrols of the Florida and Gulf areas since December 1941,proposed
to place eight B- I 7’s, operating from Barksdale Field, Louisiana, and
5 3 0

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.