Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 2 THE UNIVERSITYOF CHICAGOPRESS, CHICAGO8 LONDON The University of Toronto Press, Toronto 5, Canada Copyright 1948 by…
  • p. 48 …An Associated Press dispatch of 10 October gave a contemporary judgment of the importance of this…
  • p. 55 …Air Service (Corps) found it difficult to press vigorously for reorgani- zation and, by default, leadership…
  • p. 56 …In 1919the W a r Department was pressing for a drastic revision of the military establishment…
  • p. 61 …It held that there was no danger of an air attack on the United States and…
  • p. 64 …GHQ Air Forcq a trial than to press for more radical measures, and Howell’s group…
  • p. 75 …Powerful air attacks resolutely pressed home could never be completely stopped, but their effects could best…
  • p. 98 …based air operations in defense of the United States and its overseas posses~ions.’~T w…
  • p. 99 …General Westover’s report concluded that “all Air Force units could be concentrated on either coast…
  • p. 130 …the Admiralty began to press for control of naval air units, while the army attempted to…
  • p. 149 …basic and advanced Responsibility for crew and unit train- ing was vested in the GHQ Air…
  • p. 164 …A m y air units in the Territory existed primarily for the defense of this and…
  • p. 176 …no military alliances were made which would commit the United States to war; the plans only…
  • p. 278 …There were also grounds for hoping that heavy bomber units now based on Darwin might increase…
  • p. 285 …From 1938 the United States had invoked sanctions against Japan in the form of moral em…
  • p. 287 …Over-all Strategy and lmmediate Deployment On 2 2 December, the press announced dramatically the arrival…
  • p. 289 …ground units sent in that direction were not destined for immediate combat. No major invasion of…
  • p. 323 …Seizure of bases in Canada or Mexico for later attacks on the United States. Capture of…
  • p. 366 …United state^,^ and the British them- selves were forced to withdraw some pilots from combat units…
  • p. 380 …Upon the request of the Ferrying Command, the State Depart- ment again pressed for an answer…
  • p. 397 …the summer and fall, first as the United States Middle East Air Force and later as…
  • p. 430 …Attempts had been made to replace these obsolete craft by purchase from the United States, but…
  • p. 440 …But as the Japanese pressed forward the Americans were given no opportunity to get set. The…
  • p. 463 …personnel that would be reassigned to infantry units whose rosters already included many representatives of the…
  • p. 552 …pines and more recently of American air units operating in the Netherlands East Indies, he was…
  • p. 560 …Moreover, examination proved that most of the basic equipment of the units, including badly needed trucks…
  • p. 563 …Grady arrived from the United States for a comprehensive survey of Indian resources with reference to…
  • p. 564 …TO C H I N A graphic units, and unfavorable atmospheric conditions combined to make high…
  • p. 607 …Thus the AAF units engaged in the anti-U-boat war became almost a t once…
  • p. 628 …Army air bombardment units would operate offensively in collaboration with the Royal Air Force, primarily against…
  • p. 658 …was to operate in the United Kingdom.14' All air units initially based there were to…
  • p. 683 …of the units of the infant Eighth until their departure for the United Kingdom several months…
  • p. 691 …The RAF proposed that American fighter units be integrated with its own under a plan eventually…
  • p. 748 …533.) By 1928he was (Patrick, United States in the Air, pp. 190-91.) 38. Charges of…
  • p. 770 …y.W D Press Release, 2 1 June 1941. 9 1 . AR 95-5, 3a. 92…
  • p. 857 …Presque Isle, 344, 347-49, 641, 644-45 Press comment: B-17, 662-63; danger of…
T H E A R M Y A I R F O R C E S I N W O R L D W A R I 1
ranging from light single-engine to twin-engine types, as yet carried
no bombs, and for the most part were unable to fly patrols of any
great distance; but they managed nevertheless to relieve the Army
units, especially those of the I Air Support Command, of some of the
routine reconnaissance flying. They operated under the guidance of
that command, which in turn served under the operational control
of the I Bomber Command.’*
O n 26 March 1942, an agreement was reached between the Army
and Navy which clarified for the time being the relationship of both
these Army air commands to the naval command. Heretofore the
Army units had been operating under the control of the commander
of the Eastern Sea Frontier, but the system rested on grounds out-
lined only very generally in Joint Action and of recent months ren-
dered soft and untrustworthy by prolonged debate. There had even
been talk of “mutual cooperation” rather than “unity of command.”
Some firm decision on the matter was therefore essential to efficient
joint operations. It finally came in a message sent by the Joint Chiefs
of Staff to the commanding generals of all defense commands which
unequivocally vested jurisdiction in the sea frontier commanders over
naval forces allocated thereto and all Army air units engaged in opera-
tions over the sea for the protection of shipping and against enemy
seaborne activities. Lt. Gen. Hugh A. Drum, commanding general of
the Eastern Defense Command, promptly made available to the com-
mander of the Eastern Sea Frontier all units of I Bomber Command,
I Air Support Command, and the Civil Air Patrol, with the exception
of three bombardment and four observation squadrons which were
held as operational training units for the training of personnel in sea
search.*‘
Generally speaking, the problem facing the AAF antisubmarine
force had by the end of March assumed a more or less distinct outline.
The I Bomber Command had made progress toward adjustment to
the tactical situation into which it had been so suddenly thrust, but
Brig. Gen. Westside T. Larson, who on 7 March had succeeded Gem
era1 Krogstad in command of the organization, was able to point out
several impediments remaining in its path. Shortages in personnel and
equipment, ineffective telephone and radio communication systems, a
joint control room that, despite efforts made to improve it, still
proved unsatisfactory-these were some of the difficulties he saw still
to be overcome. In addition, he pointed urgently to the need for
5 2 8

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.