Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 303 …of Naval Opera- tions; Adm. Ernest J. King, Commander in Chief, U.S. Fleet; Gen. George…
  • p. 316 …So far as the Navy is concerned, Admiral King, as you know, is not only Chief…
  • p. 493 …Admiral King believed that the mines offered a tempting bait to the Japanese who were currently…
  • p. 526 …Hence Admiral King placed a bid for suffi- 461
  • p. 527 …t this stage of the war Admiral King had accepted the belief that his carrier planes…
  • p. 538 …plan by 2 9 June, when Admiral King submitted to the Joint Chiefs a proposal that…
  • p. 607 …type * O n 5 March 1942, Admiral King wrote to General Arnold as follows: “The experience…
  • p. 608 …s.’l A formal request by Admiral King to the Chief of the Army Air Forces…
  • p. 609 …In a letter of 9 March 1942 to Admiral King, he proposed “the estab- lishment of…
  • p. 614 …In June, Admiral King expressed the official Navy position on this point with the utmost clarity…
  • p. 615 …In a memorandum to Admiral King, General McNarney, Deputy Chief of Staff, on 26 May outlined…
  • p. 616 …viewed as a temporary deta~hment.?~ Admiral King’s reaction to these cautious proposals was expressed…
  • p. 618 …the same words as used by Admiral King a month earlier: the answer to the antisubmarine…
  • p. 621 …On 14 September, General Marshall wrote to Admiral King: “Experience with the First Bomber Command in…
  • p. 622 …T o General Marshall’s proposal of 14 September, Admiral King had replied that, although he…
  • p. 641 …54 A week later General Marshall, Admiral King, Harry Hopkins, and a small staff flew to…
  • p. 645 …that scheduled to operate from the United King- dom. Dry topic or no, organization must figure…
  • p. 684 …the principal air task in the United King- dom had long been conceived as strategic bombardment…
  • p. 707 …establishment of base depots in the United King- dom became the basis of action in January…
  • p. 724 …Implicit in all of the arrangements being made in the United King- dom was the belief…
  • p. 788 …Force, Pt. I ; Fleet Adm. Ernest J. King, First Official Report to the Secretary of the…
  • p. 793 …Memo for Adm, King from C/S, 17 Mar. 1 % ~ . 34. JPS 2I/j/D, 7…
  • p. 795 …4 Aug. 1942. 108. Zbid. 109. Adm. King’s Report on Battle of Midway, incl. in…
  • p. 797 …306, 29 June 1942; memos for Adm. King from Mar- shall, 26 June 1942, and for…
  • p. 802 …1942; CM-IN-0629, Chung- king to AGWAR, # # z , 3 Apr. 1942; memo for Gen. Arnold…
  • p. 805 …Ltr., Arnold to King, 2 5 Feb. 1942. certain evidence from all Allied and enemy sources…
  • p. 806 …Memo for King from McNarney, 26 May 1942. 7 1 . Ltr., King to Marshall, 10 June…
  • p. 807 …Ltr., Marshall to King, 14 Sept. 1942, TAB XIVA, in Bowles report; memo for C G…
  • p. 808 …to notes from Mar- shall and Adm. King). 3 2 . A I c m o for…
  • p. 814 …Forces to the United King- dom, App. A, 19 Aug. 1942. 50. Ltr., Col. H.L…
  • p. 851 …C.E., 48-50 Killin, Pfc, 219 Kilner Board, 1 2 0 Kimbolton, 63 I King…
  • p. 854 …in Chief, 515, 5 2 2 , 544. (see also King); controversy over air power vs. battleship…
T H E A R M Y A I R F O R C E S I N W O R L D W A R 11
manded combat planes.* Little wonder that General Arnold, faced
with the problem of parceling out inadequate resources, was able to
make available for antisubmarine operations only limited forces.
Early Antisubmarine Operations
Within the limits imposed by the general emergency, the opera-
tional record of those AAF units-principally of the I Bomber Com-
mand-which participated in the antisubmarine war was on the whole
very creditable. Life in the I Bomber Command moved a t a hectic
pace during the early months of war. The entire command had to be
reorganized. Having been relieved during December and January of
all but one of its bombardment groups (the 2d), it had in the first
two months of 1942 to assimilate two new bombardment groups (the
45th and the 13th) and two reconnaissance squadrons (the 3d and
92d).ls These units were for the most part as yet untrained even in
the normal techniques of bombardment, to say nothing of the special
tactics of antisubmarine warfare. Thus the command was faced with
the double problem of reorienting the training of its units and adapt-
ing all its equipment to meet the requirements of its enlarged mission.
Moreover, most of the new techniques had to be learned through
actual experience; and, owing to the urgent need for antisubmarine
patrols, the air units were forced to accomplish their training in the
course of operational missions.1g
Though even more understaffed than most organizations in those
days, I Bomber Command headquarters, under the command of Brig.
Gen. A.N. Krogstad, attacked these complex tasks with resourceful-
ness and vigor. On I 2 December, General Krogstad set up an advance
echelon at New York City to conduct tactical operations in conjunc-
tion with the NANCF, and this detachment was followed shortly by
the entire headquarters staff. On 24 January the system of joint de-
fense was extended by the establishment of a liaison office with the
Sixth Naval District at Charleston, South Carolina. The 66th Ob-
* As evidence of a continuing difficulty in reconciling the demand and the supply
of equipment, it may be further noted that the emergency call from the Middle East
in June was met by diversion of the Halverson detachment and the transfer of
virtually all heavy bombers from India, that the 43d Bombardment Group (H)
which had reached Australia in March did not receive its planes until September,
that the Eighth Air Force began operations with only one heavy bomber group, and
that the subsequent requirements of the North African operation served to keep the
combat strength of the Eighth in heavy bombers at no more than six groups until
May '943.
5 26

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.