Documents / Document

The Army Air Forces in World War II, Vol. 1 (archived PDF)

Air Force Historical Studies Office · 863 pages · text from the file's own layer

This is Volume One of The Army Air Forces in World War II, titled Plans and Early Operations, January 1939 to August 1942, edited by Wesley Frank Craven and James Lea Cate. The University of Chicago Press first published it in 1948, and the Office of Air Force History reprinted it in 1983. The front matter explains how the AAF historical program was set up during the war. The index covers Pacific, Atlantic and European operations, and nothing in the text concerns unidentified aerial phenomena.

  • p. 303 …of Naval Opera- tions; Adm. Ernest J. King, Commander in Chief, U.S. Fleet; Gen. George…
  • p. 316 …So far as the Navy is concerned, Admiral King, as you know, is not only Chief…
  • p. 493 …Admiral King believed that the mines offered a tempting bait to the Japanese who were currently…
  • p. 526 …Hence Admiral King placed a bid for suffi- 461
  • p. 527 …t this stage of the war Admiral King had accepted the belief that his carrier planes…
  • p. 538 …plan by 2 9 June, when Admiral King submitted to the Joint Chiefs a proposal that…
  • p. 607 …type * O n 5 March 1942, Admiral King wrote to General Arnold as follows: “The experience…
  • p. 608 …s.’l A formal request by Admiral King to the Chief of the Army Air Forces…
  • p. 609 …In a letter of 9 March 1942 to Admiral King, he proposed “the estab- lishment of…
  • p. 614 …In June, Admiral King expressed the official Navy position on this point with the utmost clarity…
  • p. 615 …In a memorandum to Admiral King, General McNarney, Deputy Chief of Staff, on 26 May outlined…
  • p. 616 …viewed as a temporary deta~hment.?~ Admiral King’s reaction to these cautious proposals was expressed…
  • p. 618 …the same words as used by Admiral King a month earlier: the answer to the antisubmarine…
  • p. 621 …On 14 September, General Marshall wrote to Admiral King: “Experience with the First Bomber Command in…
  • p. 622 …T o General Marshall’s proposal of 14 September, Admiral King had replied that, although he…
  • p. 641 …54 A week later General Marshall, Admiral King, Harry Hopkins, and a small staff flew to…
  • p. 645 …that scheduled to operate from the United King- dom. Dry topic or no, organization must figure…
  • p. 684 …the principal air task in the United King- dom had long been conceived as strategic bombardment…
  • p. 707 …establishment of base depots in the United King- dom became the basis of action in January…
  • p. 724 …Implicit in all of the arrangements being made in the United King- dom was the belief…
  • p. 788 …Force, Pt. I ; Fleet Adm. Ernest J. King, First Official Report to the Secretary of the…
  • p. 793 …Memo for Adm, King from C/S, 17 Mar. 1 % ~ . 34. JPS 2I/j/D, 7…
  • p. 795 …4 Aug. 1942. 108. Zbid. 109. Adm. King’s Report on Battle of Midway, incl. in…
  • p. 797 …306, 29 June 1942; memos for Adm. King from Mar- shall, 26 June 1942, and for…
  • p. 802 …1942; CM-IN-0629, Chung- king to AGWAR, # # z , 3 Apr. 1942; memo for Gen. Arnold…
  • p. 805 …Ltr., Arnold to King, 2 5 Feb. 1942. certain evidence from all Allied and enemy sources…
  • p. 806 …Memo for King from McNarney, 26 May 1942. 7 1 . Ltr., King to Marshall, 10 June…
  • p. 807 …Ltr., Marshall to King, 14 Sept. 1942, TAB XIVA, in Bowles report; memo for C G…
  • p. 808 …to notes from Mar- shall and Adm. King). 3 2 . A I c m o for…
  • p. 814 …Forces to the United King- dom, App. A, 19 Aug. 1942. 50. Ltr., Col. H.L…
  • p. 851 …C.E., 48-50 Killin, Pfc, 219 Kilner Board, 1 2 0 Kimbolton, 63 I King…
  • p. 854 …in Chief, 515, 5 2 2 , 544. (see also King); controversy over air power vs. battleship…
T H E B A T T L E O F T H E A T L A N T I C
medium range only, and were relatively limited in their carrying
capacity. And all as yet lacked special detection equipment.17
This, then, was the status of the air defenses which the United
States could bring to bear against the enemy at the opening of a most
critical phase of that costly and crucial battle of Atlantic shipping
and supply. It was an inadequate effort, albeit the best that could be
mounted in the existing circumstances. T h e explanation lies partly in
the general state of American military preparedness existing prior to
December 1941.T h e emergency in the eastern coastal waters was in
a sense but one of several desperate situations which, taken together,
stretched the resources of the U.S. armed forces in those dark days
almost to the breaking point. But the weakness of the antisubmarine
forces can be explained only in part by mere lack of men and equip-
ment. It must be explained also in terms of a lack of the right kinds
of equipment and of properly trained men-which, in turn, points
unavoidably to faulty planning in the field of coastal defense during
the years before the war.
But the opportunities of those years were now gone. T h e imme-
diate question was what steps in addition to the first emergency meas-
ures should be taken to cope with the submarine attack. That question
resolved itself into two parts: ( I ) what defenses could be provided on
a continuing emergency basis; and ( 2 ) what systematic approach
could be made to the entire problem.
In considering the contribution that could be made by the AAF to
the solution of the initial problem, it must be borne in mind that there
were many calls for planes but few planes in these first days of the
war. At the very outset, reinforcement of the Philippines had been
given the highest priority, and only by repossession of LB-3o’s from
the British had it been possible to get out to the Netherlands East
Indies the meager force which after sustaining heavy losses fell back
on Australia. T h e demands of Australian defense itself outstripped
the equipment salvaged from the Java operations. It had been neces-
sary to send help to Hawaii. Growing concern for the security of the
South Pacific, of Alaska, and of the Panama Canal prompted addi-
tional demands. T h e requirements of air transport placed still another
premium on the very planes which because of their range were best
suited to antisubmarine patrol. Nor was it possible while meeting
these emergency calls to overlook the urgent requirements of an
expanding training program which at the level of unit training de-
525

About this file

Document, cited by the archive. The PDF is mirrored here; the original link is under it. 863 pages are in the text index: search them above, or from the library's search.